Mutual information analysis for three-phase dynamic current mode logic against side-channel attack

Hyunmin Kim, Dong Guk Han, Seokhie Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To date, many different kinds of logic styles for hardware countermeasures have been developed; for example, SABL, TDPL, and DyCML. Current mode-based logic styles are useful as they consume less power compared to voltage mode-based logic styles such as SABL and TDPL. Although we developed TPDyCML in 2012 and presented it at the WISA 2012 conference, we have further optimized it in this paper using a binary decision diagram algorithm and confirmed its properties through a practical implementation of the AES S-box. In this paper, we will explain the outcome of HSPICE simulations, which included correlation power attacks, on AES S-boxes configured using a compact NMOS tree constructed from either SABL, CMOS, TDPL, DyCML, or TPDyCML. In addition, to compare the performance of each logic style in greater detail, we will carry out a mutual information analysis (MIA). Our results confirm that our logic style has good properties as a hardware countermeasure and 15% less information leakage than those secure logic styles used in our MIA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)584-594
Number of pages11
JournalETRI Journal
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Information analysis
Hardware
Binary decision diagrams
Electric potential
Side channel attack

Keywords

  • Information theoretic analysis
  • Mutual information analysis
  • Side-channel attack
  • TPDyCML

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Science(all)
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Cite this

Mutual information analysis for three-phase dynamic current mode logic against side-channel attack. / Kim, Hyunmin; Han, Dong Guk; Hong, Seokhie.

In: ETRI Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 584-594.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c923277f4d59448bb6bd6b82c980adf9,
title = "Mutual information analysis for three-phase dynamic current mode logic against side-channel attack",
abstract = "To date, many different kinds of logic styles for hardware countermeasures have been developed; for example, SABL, TDPL, and DyCML. Current mode-based logic styles are useful as they consume less power compared to voltage mode-based logic styles such as SABL and TDPL. Although we developed TPDyCML in 2012 and presented it at the WISA 2012 conference, we have further optimized it in this paper using a binary decision diagram algorithm and confirmed its properties through a practical implementation of the AES S-box. In this paper, we will explain the outcome of HSPICE simulations, which included correlation power attacks, on AES S-boxes configured using a compact NMOS tree constructed from either SABL, CMOS, TDPL, DyCML, or TPDyCML. In addition, to compare the performance of each logic style in greater detail, we will carry out a mutual information analysis (MIA). Our results confirm that our logic style has good properties as a hardware countermeasure and 15{\%} less information leakage than those secure logic styles used in our MIA.",
keywords = "Information theoretic analysis, Mutual information analysis, Side-channel attack, TPDyCML",
author = "Hyunmin Kim and Han, {Dong Guk} and Seokhie Hong",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4218/etrij.15.0114.0297",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "584--594",
journal = "ETRI Journal",
issn = "1225-6463",
publisher = "ETRI",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mutual information analysis for three-phase dynamic current mode logic against side-channel attack

AU - Kim, Hyunmin

AU - Han, Dong Guk

AU - Hong, Seokhie

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - To date, many different kinds of logic styles for hardware countermeasures have been developed; for example, SABL, TDPL, and DyCML. Current mode-based logic styles are useful as they consume less power compared to voltage mode-based logic styles such as SABL and TDPL. Although we developed TPDyCML in 2012 and presented it at the WISA 2012 conference, we have further optimized it in this paper using a binary decision diagram algorithm and confirmed its properties through a practical implementation of the AES S-box. In this paper, we will explain the outcome of HSPICE simulations, which included correlation power attacks, on AES S-boxes configured using a compact NMOS tree constructed from either SABL, CMOS, TDPL, DyCML, or TPDyCML. In addition, to compare the performance of each logic style in greater detail, we will carry out a mutual information analysis (MIA). Our results confirm that our logic style has good properties as a hardware countermeasure and 15% less information leakage than those secure logic styles used in our MIA.

AB - To date, many different kinds of logic styles for hardware countermeasures have been developed; for example, SABL, TDPL, and DyCML. Current mode-based logic styles are useful as they consume less power compared to voltage mode-based logic styles such as SABL and TDPL. Although we developed TPDyCML in 2012 and presented it at the WISA 2012 conference, we have further optimized it in this paper using a binary decision diagram algorithm and confirmed its properties through a practical implementation of the AES S-box. In this paper, we will explain the outcome of HSPICE simulations, which included correlation power attacks, on AES S-boxes configured using a compact NMOS tree constructed from either SABL, CMOS, TDPL, DyCML, or TPDyCML. In addition, to compare the performance of each logic style in greater detail, we will carry out a mutual information analysis (MIA). Our results confirm that our logic style has good properties as a hardware countermeasure and 15% less information leakage than those secure logic styles used in our MIA.

KW - Information theoretic analysis

KW - Mutual information analysis

KW - Side-channel attack

KW - TPDyCML

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930984555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930984555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4218/etrij.15.0114.0297

DO - 10.4218/etrij.15.0114.0297

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930984555

VL - 37

SP - 584

EP - 594

JO - ETRI Journal

JF - ETRI Journal

SN - 1225-6463

IS - 3

ER -