Not all memories are the same

Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency

Tobias Meilinger, Julia Frankenstein, Nadine Simon, Heinrich Bulthoff, Jean Pierre Bresciani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reference frames in spatial memory encoding have been examined intensively in recent years. However, their importance for recall has received considerably less attention. In the present study, passersby used tags to arrange a configuration map of prominent city center landmarks. It has been shown that such configurational knowledge is memorized within a north-up reference frame. However, participants adjusted their maps according to their body orientations. For example, when participants faced south, the maps were likely to face south-up. Participants also constructed maps along their location perspective—that is, the self–target direction. If, for instance, they were east of the represented area, their maps were oriented west-up. If the location perspective and body orientation were in opposite directions (i.e., if participants faced away from the city center), participants relied on location perspective. The results indicate that reference frames in spatial recall depend on the current situation rather than on the organization in long-term memory. These results cannot be explained by activation spread within a view graph, which had been used to explain similar results in the recall of city plazas. However, the results are consistent with forming and transforming a spatial image of nonvisible city locations from the current location. Furthermore, prior research has almost exclusively focused on body- and environment-based reference frames. The strong influence of location perspective in an everyday navigational context indicates that such a reference frame should be considered more often when examining human spatial cognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-252
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Long-Term Memory
Cognition
Situational
Research
Frame of Reference
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Embodied cognition
  • Navigation
  • Recall
  • Spatial memory
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Not all memories are the same : Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency. / Meilinger, Tobias; Frankenstein, Julia; Simon, Nadine; Bulthoff, Heinrich; Bresciani, Jean Pierre.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 246-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meilinger, Tobias ; Frankenstein, Julia ; Simon, Nadine ; Bulthoff, Heinrich ; Bresciani, Jean Pierre. / Not all memories are the same : Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 246-252.
@article{3c03dca02fb94f4687a296f55c66b0e4,
title = "Not all memories are the same: Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency",
abstract = "Reference frames in spatial memory encoding have been examined intensively in recent years. However, their importance for recall has received considerably less attention. In the present study, passersby used tags to arrange a configuration map of prominent city center landmarks. It has been shown that such configurational knowledge is memorized within a north-up reference frame. However, participants adjusted their maps according to their body orientations. For example, when participants faced south, the maps were likely to face south-up. Participants also constructed maps along their location perspective—that is, the self–target direction. If, for instance, they were east of the represented area, their maps were oriented west-up. If the location perspective and body orientation were in opposite directions (i.e., if participants faced away from the city center), participants relied on location perspective. The results indicate that reference frames in spatial recall depend on the current situation rather than on the organization in long-term memory. These results cannot be explained by activation spread within a view graph, which had been used to explain similar results in the recall of city plazas. However, the results are consistent with forming and transforming a spatial image of nonvisible city locations from the current location. Furthermore, prior research has almost exclusively focused on body- and environment-based reference frames. The strong influence of location perspective in an everyday navigational context indicates that such a reference frame should be considered more often when examining human spatial cognition.",
keywords = "Embodied cognition, Navigation, Recall, Spatial memory, Working memory",
author = "Tobias Meilinger and Julia Frankenstein and Nadine Simon and Heinrich Bulthoff and Bresciani, {Jean Pierre}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13423-015-0883-7",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "246--252",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not all memories are the same

T2 - Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency

AU - Meilinger, Tobias

AU - Frankenstein, Julia

AU - Simon, Nadine

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

AU - Bresciani, Jean Pierre

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Reference frames in spatial memory encoding have been examined intensively in recent years. However, their importance for recall has received considerably less attention. In the present study, passersby used tags to arrange a configuration map of prominent city center landmarks. It has been shown that such configurational knowledge is memorized within a north-up reference frame. However, participants adjusted their maps according to their body orientations. For example, when participants faced south, the maps were likely to face south-up. Participants also constructed maps along their location perspective—that is, the self–target direction. If, for instance, they were east of the represented area, their maps were oriented west-up. If the location perspective and body orientation were in opposite directions (i.e., if participants faced away from the city center), participants relied on location perspective. The results indicate that reference frames in spatial recall depend on the current situation rather than on the organization in long-term memory. These results cannot be explained by activation spread within a view graph, which had been used to explain similar results in the recall of city plazas. However, the results are consistent with forming and transforming a spatial image of nonvisible city locations from the current location. Furthermore, prior research has almost exclusively focused on body- and environment-based reference frames. The strong influence of location perspective in an everyday navigational context indicates that such a reference frame should be considered more often when examining human spatial cognition.

AB - Reference frames in spatial memory encoding have been examined intensively in recent years. However, their importance for recall has received considerably less attention. In the present study, passersby used tags to arrange a configuration map of prominent city center landmarks. It has been shown that such configurational knowledge is memorized within a north-up reference frame. However, participants adjusted their maps according to their body orientations. For example, when participants faced south, the maps were likely to face south-up. Participants also constructed maps along their location perspective—that is, the self–target direction. If, for instance, they were east of the represented area, their maps were oriented west-up. If the location perspective and body orientation were in opposite directions (i.e., if participants faced away from the city center), participants relied on location perspective. The results indicate that reference frames in spatial recall depend on the current situation rather than on the organization in long-term memory. These results cannot be explained by activation spread within a view graph, which had been used to explain similar results in the recall of city plazas. However, the results are consistent with forming and transforming a spatial image of nonvisible city locations from the current location. Furthermore, prior research has almost exclusively focused on body- and environment-based reference frames. The strong influence of location perspective in an everyday navigational context indicates that such a reference frame should be considered more often when examining human spatial cognition.

KW - Embodied cognition

KW - Navigation

KW - Recall

KW - Spatial memory

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957438880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957438880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13423-015-0883-7

DO - 10.3758/s13423-015-0883-7

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 246

EP - 252

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -