Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis

Il Park Jong Il Park, Ok Kim Hee Ok Kim, Ryong Park See Ryong Park, Chil Hwan Oh, Duck Kim Soon Duck Kim, Tae Yeum Yong Tae Yeum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Skin contact with metalworking fluid (MWF) remains a frequent cause of occupational dermatitis. However, no precise data is available about sensitization in metalworkers exposed to MWF in Korea. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of contact sensitivity among metalworkers who handle MWFs and to investigate the suitability of a screening test with MWFs being actually used in metalworkers. Methods: An epidemiological study was performed using a questionnaire in 771 workers in 9 departments of a motor company. 278 out of 771 workers had actual contact with MWF. Patch tests were performed in 73 metalworkers who had suspected dermatitis in relation to exposure of MWF, which was selected via interviews and dermatologic examinations. Patch tests were included with a routine series of common components of MWF (materials obtained from Chemotechnique®, Sweden), a solvent series and several dilutions of various crude MWFs (8 species). Results: Contact sensitization was established in 14 metalworkers (5% of 278). Sensitising substances were biocide (6 cases), corrosion inhibitors (2 cases), emulsifiers (2 cases), biostatic substances (1 cases) and others(4 cases). Therefore 10 out of 14 metalworkers had true occupational allergic contact dermatitis. 10 out of 73 screening patch tests showed positive reactions to MWF elements, and 9 people who were positive to MWF elements showed positive reactions to crude MWF, but 1 person did not. Conclusion: The prevalence of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (3.5% of 278) was low. The screening patch test by crude MWFs actually used in metalworkers may give false negatives. Therefore for the purpose of diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, we need a process of patch tests with MWF elements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-251
Number of pages6
JournalKorean Journal of Dermatology
Volume36
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Patch Tests
Skin Diseases
Occupational Dermatitis
Corrosion
Disinfectants
Contact Dermatitis
Dermatitis
Korea
Sweden
Epidemiologic Studies
Interviews
Skin

Keywords

  • Allergic contact dermatitis
  • Metalworking fluids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Jong Il Park, I. P., Hee Ok Kim, O. K., See Ryong Park, R. P., Oh, C. H., Soon Duck Kim, D. K., & Yong Tae Yeum, T. Y. (1998). Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis. Korean Journal of Dermatology, 36(2), 246-251.

Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis. / Jong Il Park, Il Park; Hee Ok Kim, Ok Kim; See Ryong Park, Ryong Park; Oh, Chil Hwan; Soon Duck Kim, Duck Kim; Yong Tae Yeum, Tae Yeum.

In: Korean Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.01.1998, p. 246-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jong Il Park, IP, Hee Ok Kim, OK, See Ryong Park, RP, Oh, CH, Soon Duck Kim, DK & Yong Tae Yeum, TY 1998, 'Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis', Korean Journal of Dermatology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 246-251.
Jong Il Park IP, Hee Ok Kim OK, See Ryong Park RP, Oh CH, Soon Duck Kim DK, Yong Tae Yeum TY. Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis. Korean Journal of Dermatology. 1998 Jan 1;36(2):246-251.
Jong Il Park, Il Park ; Hee Ok Kim, Ok Kim ; See Ryong Park, Ryong Park ; Oh, Chil Hwan ; Soon Duck Kim, Duck Kim ; Yong Tae Yeum, Tae Yeum. / Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis. In: Korean Journal of Dermatology. 1998 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 246-251.
@article{02e21d76119b41bdaad30e5ff8bffd5f,
title = "Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis",
abstract = "Background: Skin contact with metalworking fluid (MWF) remains a frequent cause of occupational dermatitis. However, no precise data is available about sensitization in metalworkers exposed to MWF in Korea. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of contact sensitivity among metalworkers who handle MWFs and to investigate the suitability of a screening test with MWFs being actually used in metalworkers. Methods: An epidemiological study was performed using a questionnaire in 771 workers in 9 departments of a motor company. 278 out of 771 workers had actual contact with MWF. Patch tests were performed in 73 metalworkers who had suspected dermatitis in relation to exposure of MWF, which was selected via interviews and dermatologic examinations. Patch tests were included with a routine series of common components of MWF (materials obtained from Chemotechnique{\circledR}, Sweden), a solvent series and several dilutions of various crude MWFs (8 species). Results: Contact sensitization was established in 14 metalworkers (5{\%} of 278). Sensitising substances were biocide (6 cases), corrosion inhibitors (2 cases), emulsifiers (2 cases), biostatic substances (1 cases) and others(4 cases). Therefore 10 out of 14 metalworkers had true occupational allergic contact dermatitis. 10 out of 73 screening patch tests showed positive reactions to MWF elements, and 9 people who were positive to MWF elements showed positive reactions to crude MWF, but 1 person did not. Conclusion: The prevalence of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (3.5{\%} of 278) was low. The screening patch test by crude MWFs actually used in metalworkers may give false negatives. Therefore for the purpose of diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, we need a process of patch tests with MWF elements.",
keywords = "Allergic contact dermatitis, Metalworking fluids",
author = "{Jong Il Park}, {Il Park} and {Hee Ok Kim}, {Ok Kim} and {See Ryong Park}, {Ryong Park} and Oh, {Chil Hwan} and {Soon Duck Kim}, {Duck Kim} and {Yong Tae Yeum}, {Tae Yeum}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "246--251",
journal = "Korean Journal of Dermatology",
issn = "0494-4739",
publisher = "Korean Dermatological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational dermatoses in metalworking fluid exposed workers. (II) allergic contact dermatitis

AU - Jong Il Park, Il Park

AU - Hee Ok Kim, Ok Kim

AU - See Ryong Park, Ryong Park

AU - Oh, Chil Hwan

AU - Soon Duck Kim, Duck Kim

AU - Yong Tae Yeum, Tae Yeum

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Background: Skin contact with metalworking fluid (MWF) remains a frequent cause of occupational dermatitis. However, no precise data is available about sensitization in metalworkers exposed to MWF in Korea. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of contact sensitivity among metalworkers who handle MWFs and to investigate the suitability of a screening test with MWFs being actually used in metalworkers. Methods: An epidemiological study was performed using a questionnaire in 771 workers in 9 departments of a motor company. 278 out of 771 workers had actual contact with MWF. Patch tests were performed in 73 metalworkers who had suspected dermatitis in relation to exposure of MWF, which was selected via interviews and dermatologic examinations. Patch tests were included with a routine series of common components of MWF (materials obtained from Chemotechnique®, Sweden), a solvent series and several dilutions of various crude MWFs (8 species). Results: Contact sensitization was established in 14 metalworkers (5% of 278). Sensitising substances were biocide (6 cases), corrosion inhibitors (2 cases), emulsifiers (2 cases), biostatic substances (1 cases) and others(4 cases). Therefore 10 out of 14 metalworkers had true occupational allergic contact dermatitis. 10 out of 73 screening patch tests showed positive reactions to MWF elements, and 9 people who were positive to MWF elements showed positive reactions to crude MWF, but 1 person did not. Conclusion: The prevalence of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (3.5% of 278) was low. The screening patch test by crude MWFs actually used in metalworkers may give false negatives. Therefore for the purpose of diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, we need a process of patch tests with MWF elements.

AB - Background: Skin contact with metalworking fluid (MWF) remains a frequent cause of occupational dermatitis. However, no precise data is available about sensitization in metalworkers exposed to MWF in Korea. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of contact sensitivity among metalworkers who handle MWFs and to investigate the suitability of a screening test with MWFs being actually used in metalworkers. Methods: An epidemiological study was performed using a questionnaire in 771 workers in 9 departments of a motor company. 278 out of 771 workers had actual contact with MWF. Patch tests were performed in 73 metalworkers who had suspected dermatitis in relation to exposure of MWF, which was selected via interviews and dermatologic examinations. Patch tests were included with a routine series of common components of MWF (materials obtained from Chemotechnique®, Sweden), a solvent series and several dilutions of various crude MWFs (8 species). Results: Contact sensitization was established in 14 metalworkers (5% of 278). Sensitising substances were biocide (6 cases), corrosion inhibitors (2 cases), emulsifiers (2 cases), biostatic substances (1 cases) and others(4 cases). Therefore 10 out of 14 metalworkers had true occupational allergic contact dermatitis. 10 out of 73 screening patch tests showed positive reactions to MWF elements, and 9 people who were positive to MWF elements showed positive reactions to crude MWF, but 1 person did not. Conclusion: The prevalence of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (3.5% of 278) was low. The screening patch test by crude MWFs actually used in metalworkers may give false negatives. Therefore for the purpose of diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, we need a process of patch tests with MWF elements.

KW - Allergic contact dermatitis

KW - Metalworking fluids

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031807930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031807930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031807930

VL - 36

SP - 246

EP - 251

JO - Korean Journal of Dermatology

JF - Korean Journal of Dermatology

SN - 0494-4739

IS - 2

ER -