Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures

Jungyu Moon, Mark E. Zobitz, Kai Nan An, Shawn W. O'Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the fixation stability of coronoid fractures achieved by a screw inserted in the anteroposterior (AP) direction with that achieved by a screw inserted in the posteroanterior (PA) direction. METHODS: Eleven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric ulna were used. A coronoid fracture was simulated by transverse osteotomy at the midpoint of coronoid height. The specimens of a pair were then randomized to be fixed with an AP screw in one specimen and a PA screw in the other. Insertion torque, load to failure, and stiffness were measured under axial load with a material testing machine. RESULTS: PA screw placement yielded greater strength and stiffness of fixation than did AP placement. The mean load to failure was 184 N in the PA screw group and 131 N in the AP screw group (P < 0.05). The mean stiffness was 106 N/mm with PA screws and 76 N/mm with AP screws (P < 0.05). These differences were statistically significant despite the fact that the screw insertion torques was similar in PA screw (0.27 Nm) and AP screw (0.25 Nm) (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: PA screw placement was biomechanically superior to AP screw placement. Together with the fact that it is clinically easier to insert and remove screw from the posterior ulna, these data indicate that optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid tip fracture is posterior to anterior direction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-280
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Apr 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fracture Fixation
Ulna
Torque
Materials Testing
Osteotomy
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Coronoid fracture
  • Elbow instability
  • Screw fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures. / Moon, Jungyu; Zobitz, Mark E.; An, Kai Nan; O'Driscoll, Shawn W.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.04.2009, p. 277-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moon, Jungyu ; Zobitz, Mark E. ; An, Kai Nan ; O'Driscoll, Shawn W. / Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 277-280.
@article{649c1265416145c99dee0f6223ec3ead,
title = "Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the fixation stability of coronoid fractures achieved by a screw inserted in the anteroposterior (AP) direction with that achieved by a screw inserted in the posteroanterior (PA) direction. METHODS: Eleven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric ulna were used. A coronoid fracture was simulated by transverse osteotomy at the midpoint of coronoid height. The specimens of a pair were then randomized to be fixed with an AP screw in one specimen and a PA screw in the other. Insertion torque, load to failure, and stiffness were measured under axial load with a material testing machine. RESULTS: PA screw placement yielded greater strength and stiffness of fixation than did AP placement. The mean load to failure was 184 N in the PA screw group and 131 N in the AP screw group (P < 0.05). The mean stiffness was 106 N/mm with PA screws and 76 N/mm with AP screws (P < 0.05). These differences were statistically significant despite the fact that the screw insertion torques was similar in PA screw (0.27 Nm) and AP screw (0.25 Nm) (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: PA screw placement was biomechanically superior to AP screw placement. Together with the fact that it is clinically easier to insert and remove screw from the posterior ulna, these data indicate that optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid tip fracture is posterior to anterior direction.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Coronoid fracture, Elbow instability, Screw fixation",
author = "Jungyu Moon and Zobitz, {Mark E.} and An, {Kai Nan} and O'Driscoll, {Shawn W.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819df8c9",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "277--280",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures

AU - Moon, Jungyu

AU - Zobitz, Mark E.

AU - An, Kai Nan

AU - O'Driscoll, Shawn W.

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the fixation stability of coronoid fractures achieved by a screw inserted in the anteroposterior (AP) direction with that achieved by a screw inserted in the posteroanterior (PA) direction. METHODS: Eleven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric ulna were used. A coronoid fracture was simulated by transverse osteotomy at the midpoint of coronoid height. The specimens of a pair were then randomized to be fixed with an AP screw in one specimen and a PA screw in the other. Insertion torque, load to failure, and stiffness were measured under axial load with a material testing machine. RESULTS: PA screw placement yielded greater strength and stiffness of fixation than did AP placement. The mean load to failure was 184 N in the PA screw group and 131 N in the AP screw group (P < 0.05). The mean stiffness was 106 N/mm with PA screws and 76 N/mm with AP screws (P < 0.05). These differences were statistically significant despite the fact that the screw insertion torques was similar in PA screw (0.27 Nm) and AP screw (0.25 Nm) (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: PA screw placement was biomechanically superior to AP screw placement. Together with the fact that it is clinically easier to insert and remove screw from the posterior ulna, these data indicate that optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid tip fracture is posterior to anterior direction.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the fixation stability of coronoid fractures achieved by a screw inserted in the anteroposterior (AP) direction with that achieved by a screw inserted in the posteroanterior (PA) direction. METHODS: Eleven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric ulna were used. A coronoid fracture was simulated by transverse osteotomy at the midpoint of coronoid height. The specimens of a pair were then randomized to be fixed with an AP screw in one specimen and a PA screw in the other. Insertion torque, load to failure, and stiffness were measured under axial load with a material testing machine. RESULTS: PA screw placement yielded greater strength and stiffness of fixation than did AP placement. The mean load to failure was 184 N in the PA screw group and 131 N in the AP screw group (P < 0.05). The mean stiffness was 106 N/mm with PA screws and 76 N/mm with AP screws (P < 0.05). These differences were statistically significant despite the fact that the screw insertion torques was similar in PA screw (0.27 Nm) and AP screw (0.25 Nm) (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: PA screw placement was biomechanically superior to AP screw placement. Together with the fact that it is clinically easier to insert and remove screw from the posterior ulna, these data indicate that optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid tip fracture is posterior to anterior direction.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Coronoid fracture

KW - Elbow instability

KW - Screw fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66149092359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66149092359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819df8c9

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819df8c9

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 277

EP - 280

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 4

ER -