Optogenetic monitoring of synaptic activity with genetically encoded voltage indicators

Ryuichi Nakajima, Arong Jung, Bongjune Yoon, Bradley J. Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The age of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) has matured to the point that changes in membrane potential can now be observed optically in vivo. Improving the signal size and speed of these voltage sensors has been the primary driving forces during this maturation process. As a result, there is a wide range of probes using different voltage detecting mechanisms and fluorescent reporters. As the use of these probes transitions from optically reporting membrane potential in single, cultured cells to imaging populations of cells in slice and/or in vivo, a new challenge emerges-optically resolving the different types of neuronal activity. While improvements in speed and signal size are still needed, optimizing the voltage range and the subcellular expression (i.e., soma only) of the probe are becoming more important. In this review, we will examine the ability of recently developed probes to report synaptic activity in slice and in vivo. The voltage-sensing fluorescent protein (VSFP) family of voltage sensors, ArcLight, ASAP-1, and the rhodopsin family of probes are all good at reporting changes in membrane potential, but all have difficulty distinguishing subthreshold depolarizations from action potentials and detecting neuronal inhibition when imaging populations of cells. Finally, we will offer a few possible ways to improve the optical resolution of the various types of neuronal activities.

Original languageEnglish
Article number22
JournalFrontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
Volume8
Issue numberAUG
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Optogenetics
Membrane Potentials
Rhodopsin
Carisoprodol
Population
Action Potentials
Cultured Cells
Proteins

Keywords

  • Brain slices
  • Genetically-encoded voltage indicators
  • In vivo
  • Optogenetics
  • Synaptic activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Optogenetic monitoring of synaptic activity with genetically encoded voltage indicators. / Nakajima, Ryuichi; Jung, Arong; Yoon, Bongjune; Baker, Bradley J.

In: Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, Vol. 8, No. AUG, 22, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2fbfaec8e458463fa4a87d36d6bd9234,
title = "Optogenetic monitoring of synaptic activity with genetically encoded voltage indicators",
abstract = "The age of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) has matured to the point that changes in membrane potential can now be observed optically in vivo. Improving the signal size and speed of these voltage sensors has been the primary driving forces during this maturation process. As a result, there is a wide range of probes using different voltage detecting mechanisms and fluorescent reporters. As the use of these probes transitions from optically reporting membrane potential in single, cultured cells to imaging populations of cells in slice and/or in vivo, a new challenge emerges-optically resolving the different types of neuronal activity. While improvements in speed and signal size are still needed, optimizing the voltage range and the subcellular expression (i.e., soma only) of the probe are becoming more important. In this review, we will examine the ability of recently developed probes to report synaptic activity in slice and in vivo. The voltage-sensing fluorescent protein (VSFP) family of voltage sensors, ArcLight, ASAP-1, and the rhodopsin family of probes are all good at reporting changes in membrane potential, but all have difficulty distinguishing subthreshold depolarizations from action potentials and detecting neuronal inhibition when imaging populations of cells. Finally, we will offer a few possible ways to improve the optical resolution of the various types of neuronal activities.",
keywords = "Brain slices, Genetically-encoded voltage indicators, In vivo, Optogenetics, Synaptic activity",
author = "Ryuichi Nakajima and Arong Jung and Bongjune Yoon and Baker, {Bradley J.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00022",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience",
issn = "1663-3563",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "AUG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optogenetic monitoring of synaptic activity with genetically encoded voltage indicators

AU - Nakajima, Ryuichi

AU - Jung, Arong

AU - Yoon, Bongjune

AU - Baker, Bradley J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The age of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) has matured to the point that changes in membrane potential can now be observed optically in vivo. Improving the signal size and speed of these voltage sensors has been the primary driving forces during this maturation process. As a result, there is a wide range of probes using different voltage detecting mechanisms and fluorescent reporters. As the use of these probes transitions from optically reporting membrane potential in single, cultured cells to imaging populations of cells in slice and/or in vivo, a new challenge emerges-optically resolving the different types of neuronal activity. While improvements in speed and signal size are still needed, optimizing the voltage range and the subcellular expression (i.e., soma only) of the probe are becoming more important. In this review, we will examine the ability of recently developed probes to report synaptic activity in slice and in vivo. The voltage-sensing fluorescent protein (VSFP) family of voltage sensors, ArcLight, ASAP-1, and the rhodopsin family of probes are all good at reporting changes in membrane potential, but all have difficulty distinguishing subthreshold depolarizations from action potentials and detecting neuronal inhibition when imaging populations of cells. Finally, we will offer a few possible ways to improve the optical resolution of the various types of neuronal activities.

AB - The age of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) has matured to the point that changes in membrane potential can now be observed optically in vivo. Improving the signal size and speed of these voltage sensors has been the primary driving forces during this maturation process. As a result, there is a wide range of probes using different voltage detecting mechanisms and fluorescent reporters. As the use of these probes transitions from optically reporting membrane potential in single, cultured cells to imaging populations of cells in slice and/or in vivo, a new challenge emerges-optically resolving the different types of neuronal activity. While improvements in speed and signal size are still needed, optimizing the voltage range and the subcellular expression (i.e., soma only) of the probe are becoming more important. In this review, we will examine the ability of recently developed probes to report synaptic activity in slice and in vivo. The voltage-sensing fluorescent protein (VSFP) family of voltage sensors, ArcLight, ASAP-1, and the rhodopsin family of probes are all good at reporting changes in membrane potential, but all have difficulty distinguishing subthreshold depolarizations from action potentials and detecting neuronal inhibition when imaging populations of cells. Finally, we will offer a few possible ways to improve the optical resolution of the various types of neuronal activities.

KW - Brain slices

KW - Genetically-encoded voltage indicators

KW - In vivo

KW - Optogenetics

KW - Synaptic activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993945237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993945237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00022

DO - 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00022

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84993945237

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience

SN - 1663-3563

IS - AUG

M1 - 22

ER -