TY - JOUR
T1 - Overconsolidation and cementation in sands
T2 - Impacts on geotechnical properties and evaluation using dilatometer tests
AU - Choo, Hyunwook
AU - Lee, Woojin
AU - Lee, Changho
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2015R1A2A2A01006337).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by ASTM International.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Both overconsolidated and cemented soils, which are very common in nature, show very distinctive behaviors (e.g., increased strength and stiffness) compared to normally consolidated (NC) soils, uncemented soils, or both. Therefore, the characterization of soil properties in an overconsolidated/cemented state is important in many geotechnical projects for the safe and economical design and analysis of geostructures. Although there have been many attempts to evaluate overconsolidated or cemented sediments using in situ tests, the complexity of the behaviors of overconsolidated or cemented sands has contributed to the difficulty in interpreting in situ test results. Among the various in situ testing methods, such as the cone penetration test, the dilatometer test (DMT), the standard penetration test, and others, the DMT is very sensitive to the stress history effect and overconsolidation in sand. Therefore, the impacts of overconsolidation and cementation on geotechnical properties of sands are reviewed first in this study, and then the methods for evaluating overconsolidation and cementation in sands using DMTs are reviewed/suggested.
AB - Both overconsolidated and cemented soils, which are very common in nature, show very distinctive behaviors (e.g., increased strength and stiffness) compared to normally consolidated (NC) soils, uncemented soils, or both. Therefore, the characterization of soil properties in an overconsolidated/cemented state is important in many geotechnical projects for the safe and economical design and analysis of geostructures. Although there have been many attempts to evaluate overconsolidated or cemented sediments using in situ tests, the complexity of the behaviors of overconsolidated or cemented sands has contributed to the difficulty in interpreting in situ test results. Among the various in situ testing methods, such as the cone penetration test, the dilatometer test (DMT), the standard penetration test, and others, the DMT is very sensitive to the stress history effect and overconsolidation in sand. Therefore, the impacts of overconsolidation and cementation on geotechnical properties of sands are reviewed first in this study, and then the methods for evaluating overconsolidation and cementation in sands using DMTs are reviewed/suggested.
KW - Cementation
KW - Cemented sand
KW - Dilatometer test
KW - Overconsolidated sand
KW - Overconsolidation ratio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056462286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1520/GTJ20170368
DO - 10.1520/GTJ20170368
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056462286
SN - 0149-6115
VL - 41
SP - 915
EP - 929
JO - Geotechnical Testing Journal
JF - Geotechnical Testing Journal
IS - 5
ER -