Patient outcomes when hospitals experience a surge in admissions

William N. Evans, Beomsoo Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In January 2004, a California law passed in 1999 became effective regulating minimum nurse to patient ratios in hospital units. This legislation was prompted by results from previous research showing higher adverse patient outcomes when hospital nurse/patient ratios are low. In this study, we use a census of hospital discharges in California over the 1996-2000 period to estimate the impact of hospital staff levels on adverse events by examining whether outcomes are correlated with the number of admissions in the hospital over the next 2 days. Because hospital staff levels are determined in advance, a large influx of patients to a hospital over the next 2 days will reduce the effective staff levels for patients admitted previously. We focus on the outcomes of patients admitted on Thursdays because hospital admissions are the most variable on Friday and Saturday and hospital staffs are lowest during the weekend. We find some evidence that large shocks to admissions on Friday and Saturday tend to reduce the length of stay and increase the chance of a subsequent readmission, but these coefficients are very small. We find quantitatively small and statistically insignificant effects of Friday and Saturday admission shocks on mortality rates of patients admitted on Thursdays. These results suggest that the portion of the California law designed to guarantee adequate staffing when the patient census increases unexpectedly should have little impact on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-388
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Mar 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Censuses
Shock
Nurses
Patient outcomes
Admission
Hospital Units
Legislation
Length of Stay
Mortality
Staff
Research
Census
Mortality rate
Staffing
Adverse events
Guarantee
Coefficients
Length of stay

Keywords

  • Hospital staffing
  • Inpatient outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Patient outcomes when hospitals experience a surge in admissions. / Evans, William N.; Kim, Beomsoo.

In: Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.03.2006, p. 365-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{356a554c04984bf5a5409e1e088c3322,
title = "Patient outcomes when hospitals experience a surge in admissions",
abstract = "In January 2004, a California law passed in 1999 became effective regulating minimum nurse to patient ratios in hospital units. This legislation was prompted by results from previous research showing higher adverse patient outcomes when hospital nurse/patient ratios are low. In this study, we use a census of hospital discharges in California over the 1996-2000 period to estimate the impact of hospital staff levels on adverse events by examining whether outcomes are correlated with the number of admissions in the hospital over the next 2 days. Because hospital staff levels are determined in advance, a large influx of patients to a hospital over the next 2 days will reduce the effective staff levels for patients admitted previously. We focus on the outcomes of patients admitted on Thursdays because hospital admissions are the most variable on Friday and Saturday and hospital staffs are lowest during the weekend. We find some evidence that large shocks to admissions on Friday and Saturday tend to reduce the length of stay and increase the chance of a subsequent readmission, but these coefficients are very small. We find quantitatively small and statistically insignificant effects of Friday and Saturday admission shocks on mortality rates of patients admitted on Thursdays. These results suggest that the portion of the California law designed to guarantee adequate staffing when the patient census increases unexpectedly should have little impact on patient outcomes.",
keywords = "Hospital staffing, Inpatient outcomes",
author = "Evans, {William N.} and Beomsoo Kim",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "365--388",
journal = "Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "0167-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient outcomes when hospitals experience a surge in admissions

AU - Evans, William N.

AU - Kim, Beomsoo

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - In January 2004, a California law passed in 1999 became effective regulating minimum nurse to patient ratios in hospital units. This legislation was prompted by results from previous research showing higher adverse patient outcomes when hospital nurse/patient ratios are low. In this study, we use a census of hospital discharges in California over the 1996-2000 period to estimate the impact of hospital staff levels on adverse events by examining whether outcomes are correlated with the number of admissions in the hospital over the next 2 days. Because hospital staff levels are determined in advance, a large influx of patients to a hospital over the next 2 days will reduce the effective staff levels for patients admitted previously. We focus on the outcomes of patients admitted on Thursdays because hospital admissions are the most variable on Friday and Saturday and hospital staffs are lowest during the weekend. We find some evidence that large shocks to admissions on Friday and Saturday tend to reduce the length of stay and increase the chance of a subsequent readmission, but these coefficients are very small. We find quantitatively small and statistically insignificant effects of Friday and Saturday admission shocks on mortality rates of patients admitted on Thursdays. These results suggest that the portion of the California law designed to guarantee adequate staffing when the patient census increases unexpectedly should have little impact on patient outcomes.

AB - In January 2004, a California law passed in 1999 became effective regulating minimum nurse to patient ratios in hospital units. This legislation was prompted by results from previous research showing higher adverse patient outcomes when hospital nurse/patient ratios are low. In this study, we use a census of hospital discharges in California over the 1996-2000 period to estimate the impact of hospital staff levels on adverse events by examining whether outcomes are correlated with the number of admissions in the hospital over the next 2 days. Because hospital staff levels are determined in advance, a large influx of patients to a hospital over the next 2 days will reduce the effective staff levels for patients admitted previously. We focus on the outcomes of patients admitted on Thursdays because hospital admissions are the most variable on Friday and Saturday and hospital staffs are lowest during the weekend. We find some evidence that large shocks to admissions on Friday and Saturday tend to reduce the length of stay and increase the chance of a subsequent readmission, but these coefficients are very small. We find quantitatively small and statistically insignificant effects of Friday and Saturday admission shocks on mortality rates of patients admitted on Thursdays. These results suggest that the portion of the California law designed to guarantee adequate staffing when the patient census increases unexpectedly should have little impact on patient outcomes.

KW - Hospital staffing

KW - Inpatient outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33344462864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33344462864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 365

EP - 388

JO - Journal of Health Economics

JF - Journal of Health Economics

SN - 0167-6296

IS - 2

ER -