Patients' education, and its impact on care outcomes, resource consumption and working conditions

Data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS)

J. J. Gagliardino, P. Aschner, Sei-Hyun Baik, J. Chan, J. M. Chantelot, H. Ilkova, A. Ramachandran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the impact of diabetes education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in non-controlled studies (" real-world conditions" ) on quality of care, resource consumption and conditions of employment. Methods: This cross-sectional study and longitudinal follow-up describe the data (demographic and socioeconomic profiles, clinical characteristics, treatment of hyperglycaemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors, resource consumption) collected during the second phase (2006) of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Patients received diabetes education directly from the practice nurse, dietitian or educator, or were referred to ad hoc group-education programmes; all programmes emphasized healthy lifestyle changes, self-care and active participation in disease control and treatment. Educated vs non-educated T2DM patients (n=5692 in each group), paired by age, gender and diabetes duration, were randomly recruited for the IDMPS by participating primary-care physicians from 27 countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa. Outcome measures included clinical (body weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure, foot evaluation), metabolic (HbA 1c levels, blood lipid profile) and biochemical control measures. Treatment goals were defined according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Results: T2DM patients' education significantly improved the percentage of patients achieving target values set by international guidelines. Educated patients increased their insulin use and self-care performance, had a lower rate of chronic complications and a modest increase in cost of care, and probably higher salaries and slightly better productivity. Conclusion: Diabetes education is an efficient tool for improving care outcomes without having a major impact on healthcare costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-134
Number of pages7
JournalDiabetes and Metabolism
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Practice Management
Patient Education
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Education
Self Care
Guidelines
Eastern Europe
Body Height
Nutritionists
Far East
Latin America
Quality of Health Care
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Primary Care Physicians
Waist Circumference
Hyperglycemia
Health Care Costs
Foot
Therapeutics
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Costs
  • Developing countries
  • Diabetes
  • Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Patients' education, and its impact on care outcomes, resource consumption and working conditions : Data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). / Gagliardino, J. J.; Aschner, P.; Baik, Sei-Hyun; Chan, J.; Chantelot, J. M.; Ilkova, H.; Ramachandran, A.

In: Diabetes and Metabolism, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 128-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1df6428e652d4cb9841f7118cfbca437,
title = "Patients' education, and its impact on care outcomes, resource consumption and working conditions: Data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS)",
abstract = "Aim: To evaluate the impact of diabetes education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in non-controlled studies ({"} real-world conditions{"} ) on quality of care, resource consumption and conditions of employment. Methods: This cross-sectional study and longitudinal follow-up describe the data (demographic and socioeconomic profiles, clinical characteristics, treatment of hyperglycaemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors, resource consumption) collected during the second phase (2006) of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Patients received diabetes education directly from the practice nurse, dietitian or educator, or were referred to ad hoc group-education programmes; all programmes emphasized healthy lifestyle changes, self-care and active participation in disease control and treatment. Educated vs non-educated T2DM patients (n=5692 in each group), paired by age, gender and diabetes duration, were randomly recruited for the IDMPS by participating primary-care physicians from 27 countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa. Outcome measures included clinical (body weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure, foot evaluation), metabolic (HbA 1c levels, blood lipid profile) and biochemical control measures. Treatment goals were defined according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Results: T2DM patients' education significantly improved the percentage of patients achieving target values set by international guidelines. Educated patients increased their insulin use and self-care performance, had a lower rate of chronic complications and a modest increase in cost of care, and probably higher salaries and slightly better productivity. Conclusion: Diabetes education is an efficient tool for improving care outcomes without having a major impact on healthcare costs.",
keywords = "Costs, Developing countries, Diabetes, Education",
author = "Gagliardino, {J. J.} and P. Aschner and Sei-Hyun Baik and J. Chan and Chantelot, {J. M.} and H. Ilkova and A. Ramachandran",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.diabet.2011.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "128--134",
journal = "Diabetes and Metabolism",
issn = "1262-3636",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' education, and its impact on care outcomes, resource consumption and working conditions

T2 - Data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS)

AU - Gagliardino, J. J.

AU - Aschner, P.

AU - Baik, Sei-Hyun

AU - Chan, J.

AU - Chantelot, J. M.

AU - Ilkova, H.

AU - Ramachandran, A.

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Aim: To evaluate the impact of diabetes education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in non-controlled studies (" real-world conditions" ) on quality of care, resource consumption and conditions of employment. Methods: This cross-sectional study and longitudinal follow-up describe the data (demographic and socioeconomic profiles, clinical characteristics, treatment of hyperglycaemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors, resource consumption) collected during the second phase (2006) of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Patients received diabetes education directly from the practice nurse, dietitian or educator, or were referred to ad hoc group-education programmes; all programmes emphasized healthy lifestyle changes, self-care and active participation in disease control and treatment. Educated vs non-educated T2DM patients (n=5692 in each group), paired by age, gender and diabetes duration, were randomly recruited for the IDMPS by participating primary-care physicians from 27 countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa. Outcome measures included clinical (body weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure, foot evaluation), metabolic (HbA 1c levels, blood lipid profile) and biochemical control measures. Treatment goals were defined according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Results: T2DM patients' education significantly improved the percentage of patients achieving target values set by international guidelines. Educated patients increased their insulin use and self-care performance, had a lower rate of chronic complications and a modest increase in cost of care, and probably higher salaries and slightly better productivity. Conclusion: Diabetes education is an efficient tool for improving care outcomes without having a major impact on healthcare costs.

AB - Aim: To evaluate the impact of diabetes education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in non-controlled studies (" real-world conditions" ) on quality of care, resource consumption and conditions of employment. Methods: This cross-sectional study and longitudinal follow-up describe the data (demographic and socioeconomic profiles, clinical characteristics, treatment of hyperglycaemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors, resource consumption) collected during the second phase (2006) of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Patients received diabetes education directly from the practice nurse, dietitian or educator, or were referred to ad hoc group-education programmes; all programmes emphasized healthy lifestyle changes, self-care and active participation in disease control and treatment. Educated vs non-educated T2DM patients (n=5692 in each group), paired by age, gender and diabetes duration, were randomly recruited for the IDMPS by participating primary-care physicians from 27 countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa. Outcome measures included clinical (body weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure, foot evaluation), metabolic (HbA 1c levels, blood lipid profile) and biochemical control measures. Treatment goals were defined according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Results: T2DM patients' education significantly improved the percentage of patients achieving target values set by international guidelines. Educated patients increased their insulin use and self-care performance, had a lower rate of chronic complications and a modest increase in cost of care, and probably higher salaries and slightly better productivity. Conclusion: Diabetes education is an efficient tool for improving care outcomes without having a major impact on healthcare costs.

KW - Costs

KW - Developing countries

KW - Diabetes

KW - Education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859732473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859732473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 128

EP - 134

JO - Diabetes and Metabolism

JF - Diabetes and Metabolism

SN - 1262-3636

IS - 2

ER -