Perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace: Not that great

Heesung Shin, Sun Woong Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous studies that have examined the effectiveness of self-handicapping behavior as an impression management strategy have shown different results between students and workers. In order to generalize the results among workers, the present study examined the perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace by replicating and extending Park and Brown’s study (Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 124–132, 2014) to workers in South Korea. To this end, 252 workers evaluated a target whose behavior (self-handicapping vs. control) and outcome (success vs. failure) were manipulated. Participants assessed the target in terms of attributions (to ability, effort, external factors, and luck) and their willingness to socialize and collaborate with the target. Results revealed that workers generally evaluated self-handicapping targets more negatively than control targets.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Workplace
Applied Psychology
Social Psychology
Republic of Korea
Aptitude
Students

Keywords

  • External attribution
  • Impression management
  • Internal attribution
  • Self-handicapping
  • Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace : Not that great. / Shin, Heesung; Park, Sun Woong.

In: Current Psychology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4671419c7f1948f7afffef1f962b08e8,
title = "Perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace: Not that great",
abstract = "Previous studies that have examined the effectiveness of self-handicapping behavior as an impression management strategy have shown different results between students and workers. In order to generalize the results among workers, the present study examined the perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace by replicating and extending Park and Brown’s study (Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 124–132, 2014) to workers in South Korea. To this end, 252 workers evaluated a target whose behavior (self-handicapping vs. control) and outcome (success vs. failure) were manipulated. Participants assessed the target in terms of attributions (to ability, effort, external factors, and luck) and their willingness to socialize and collaborate with the target. Results revealed that workers generally evaluated self-handicapping targets more negatively than control targets.",
keywords = "External attribution, Impression management, Internal attribution, Self-handicapping, Workplace",
author = "Heesung Shin and Park, {Sun Woong}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12144-018-0013-6",
language = "English",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "1046-1310",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace

T2 - Not that great

AU - Shin, Heesung

AU - Park, Sun Woong

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Previous studies that have examined the effectiveness of self-handicapping behavior as an impression management strategy have shown different results between students and workers. In order to generalize the results among workers, the present study examined the perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace by replicating and extending Park and Brown’s study (Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 124–132, 2014) to workers in South Korea. To this end, 252 workers evaluated a target whose behavior (self-handicapping vs. control) and outcome (success vs. failure) were manipulated. Participants assessed the target in terms of attributions (to ability, effort, external factors, and luck) and their willingness to socialize and collaborate with the target. Results revealed that workers generally evaluated self-handicapping targets more negatively than control targets.

AB - Previous studies that have examined the effectiveness of self-handicapping behavior as an impression management strategy have shown different results between students and workers. In order to generalize the results among workers, the present study examined the perception of self-handicapping behavior in the workplace by replicating and extending Park and Brown’s study (Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 124–132, 2014) to workers in South Korea. To this end, 252 workers evaluated a target whose behavior (self-handicapping vs. control) and outcome (success vs. failure) were manipulated. Participants assessed the target in terms of attributions (to ability, effort, external factors, and luck) and their willingness to socialize and collaborate with the target. Results revealed that workers generally evaluated self-handicapping targets more negatively than control targets.

KW - External attribution

KW - Impression management

KW - Internal attribution

KW - Self-handicapping

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054163869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054163869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-018-0013-6

DO - 10.1007/s12144-018-0013-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054163869

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

ER -