Perceptions of unfairness and a weak universal welfare state in South Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since its democratization, South Korea has widened the population coverage of various social programs, yet the generosity of most programs remains shallow. Existing studies offer state/elite-centered explanations for this move toward a weak universalistic welfare state. I suggest that the move rather accurately reflects citizen attitudes as well: a majority of Koreans across economic classes support welfare state expansion, yet a large segment of the self-proclaimed supporters are unwilling to pay for the expansion. I argue that underlying such mixed attitudes is the perceived unfairness of the tax and transfer systems. More specifically, (1) the perception of unfair contribution vis-à-vis other taxpayers and (2) the perception of unfair fiscal exchange with the government significantly lower one's willingness to contribute to the welfare state. My analysis of a nation-wide survey lends support to my argument. My findings have important policy implications for the emerging economies where, despite a growing citizen demand for social protection, the fiscal support base for welfare state expansion is frail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-396
Number of pages21
JournalJapanese Journal of Political Science
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Sep 1

Fingerprint

South Korea
welfare state
citizen
taxes
democratization
elite
coverage
economy
demand
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Perceptions of unfairness and a weak universal welfare state in South Korea. / Lim, Sijeong.

In: Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 376-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{18a427ca7e8f4b09b91b6152b1da5731,
title = "Perceptions of unfairness and a weak universal welfare state in South Korea",
abstract = "Since its democratization, South Korea has widened the population coverage of various social programs, yet the generosity of most programs remains shallow. Existing studies offer state/elite-centered explanations for this move toward a weak universalistic welfare state. I suggest that the move rather accurately reflects citizen attitudes as well: a majority of Koreans across economic classes support welfare state expansion, yet a large segment of the self-proclaimed supporters are unwilling to pay for the expansion. I argue that underlying such mixed attitudes is the perceived unfairness of the tax and transfer systems. More specifically, (1) the perception of unfair contribution vis-{\`a}-vis other taxpayers and (2) the perception of unfair fiscal exchange with the government significantly lower one's willingness to contribute to the welfare state. My analysis of a nation-wide survey lends support to my argument. My findings have important policy implications for the emerging economies where, despite a growing citizen demand for social protection, the fiscal support base for welfare state expansion is frail.",
author = "Sijeong Lim",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1468109918000208",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "376--396",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1468-1099",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of unfairness and a weak universal welfare state in South Korea

AU - Lim, Sijeong

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Since its democratization, South Korea has widened the population coverage of various social programs, yet the generosity of most programs remains shallow. Existing studies offer state/elite-centered explanations for this move toward a weak universalistic welfare state. I suggest that the move rather accurately reflects citizen attitudes as well: a majority of Koreans across economic classes support welfare state expansion, yet a large segment of the self-proclaimed supporters are unwilling to pay for the expansion. I argue that underlying such mixed attitudes is the perceived unfairness of the tax and transfer systems. More specifically, (1) the perception of unfair contribution vis-à-vis other taxpayers and (2) the perception of unfair fiscal exchange with the government significantly lower one's willingness to contribute to the welfare state. My analysis of a nation-wide survey lends support to my argument. My findings have important policy implications for the emerging economies where, despite a growing citizen demand for social protection, the fiscal support base for welfare state expansion is frail.

AB - Since its democratization, South Korea has widened the population coverage of various social programs, yet the generosity of most programs remains shallow. Existing studies offer state/elite-centered explanations for this move toward a weak universalistic welfare state. I suggest that the move rather accurately reflects citizen attitudes as well: a majority of Koreans across economic classes support welfare state expansion, yet a large segment of the self-proclaimed supporters are unwilling to pay for the expansion. I argue that underlying such mixed attitudes is the perceived unfairness of the tax and transfer systems. More specifically, (1) the perception of unfair contribution vis-à-vis other taxpayers and (2) the perception of unfair fiscal exchange with the government significantly lower one's willingness to contribute to the welfare state. My analysis of a nation-wide survey lends support to my argument. My findings have important policy implications for the emerging economies where, despite a growing citizen demand for social protection, the fiscal support base for welfare state expansion is frail.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052645678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052645678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1468109918000208

DO - 10.1017/S1468109918000208

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052645678

VL - 19

SP - 376

EP - 396

JO - Japanese Journal of Political Science

JF - Japanese Journal of Political Science

SN - 1468-1099

IS - 3

ER -