Performance evaluation of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers by conducting in-situ thermal response tests

Chulho Lee, Moonseo Park, The Bao Nguyen, Byonghu Sohn, Jong Min Choi, Hangseok Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effective thermal conductivity of six vertical closed-loop ground heat exchangers (GHEXs), which were installed in a test bed located in Wonju, South Korea, has been experimentally evaluated by performing in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs). To compare the thermal efficiency of the GHEXs in field, various installation conditions are considered such as different grouting materials (cement vs. bentonite), different additives (silica sand vs. graphite) and shapes of the circulating pipe-section (conventional U-loop type vs. 3-pipe type). From the test results, it can be concluded that the cement grout has higher effective thermal conductivity than the bentonite grout by 7.4-10.1%, and the graphite outperforms the silica sand by 6.7-9.1% as a thermally-enhancing additive. In addition, the new 3-pipe type heat exchange pipe that yields less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipes shows better thermal performance over the conventional U-loop type heat exchange pipe by 14.1-14.5%. Based on the results from the in-situ thermal response tests, a series of cost analyses has been carried out to show the applicability of the cement grouting, the graphite additive, and the new 3-pipe type of heat exchange pipe section. For the same condition, the cement grouting can reduce the construction cost of GHEXs by around 40% in the given cost analysis scenario. In addition, an addition of graphite and use the new 3-pipe heat exchange pipe lead to about 8% and 6% cost reduction, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-83
Number of pages7
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Heat exchangers
Pipe
Grouting
Cements
Graphite
Silica sand
Bentonite
Thermal conductivity
Hot Temperature
Costs
Heat pipes
Cost reduction

Keywords

  • Ground heat exchanger
  • In-situ thermal response test
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Thermal interference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Performance evaluation of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers by conducting in-situ thermal response tests. / Lee, Chulho; Park, Moonseo; Nguyen, The Bao; Sohn, Byonghu; Choi, Jong Min; Choi, Hangseok.

In: Renewable Energy, Vol. 42, 01.06.2012, p. 77-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Chulho ; Park, Moonseo ; Nguyen, The Bao ; Sohn, Byonghu ; Choi, Jong Min ; Choi, Hangseok. / Performance evaluation of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers by conducting in-situ thermal response tests. In: Renewable Energy. 2012 ; Vol. 42. pp. 77-83.
@article{5d0daa27325340beb364fe9f68afaedf,
title = "Performance evaluation of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers by conducting in-situ thermal response tests",
abstract = "The effective thermal conductivity of six vertical closed-loop ground heat exchangers (GHEXs), which were installed in a test bed located in Wonju, South Korea, has been experimentally evaluated by performing in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs). To compare the thermal efficiency of the GHEXs in field, various installation conditions are considered such as different grouting materials (cement vs. bentonite), different additives (silica sand vs. graphite) and shapes of the circulating pipe-section (conventional U-loop type vs. 3-pipe type). From the test results, it can be concluded that the cement grout has higher effective thermal conductivity than the bentonite grout by 7.4-10.1{\%}, and the graphite outperforms the silica sand by 6.7-9.1{\%} as a thermally-enhancing additive. In addition, the new 3-pipe type heat exchange pipe that yields less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipes shows better thermal performance over the conventional U-loop type heat exchange pipe by 14.1-14.5{\%}. Based on the results from the in-situ thermal response tests, a series of cost analyses has been carried out to show the applicability of the cement grouting, the graphite additive, and the new 3-pipe type of heat exchange pipe section. For the same condition, the cement grouting can reduce the construction cost of GHEXs by around 40{\%} in the given cost analysis scenario. In addition, an addition of graphite and use the new 3-pipe heat exchange pipe lead to about 8{\%} and 6{\%} cost reduction, respectively.",
keywords = "Ground heat exchanger, In-situ thermal response test, Thermal conductivity, Thermal interference",
author = "Chulho Lee and Moonseo Park and Nguyen, {The Bao} and Byonghu Sohn and Choi, {Jong Min} and Hangseok Choi",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.013",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "77--83",
journal = "Renewable Energy",
issn = "0960-1481",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance evaluation of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers by conducting in-situ thermal response tests

AU - Lee, Chulho

AU - Park, Moonseo

AU - Nguyen, The Bao

AU - Sohn, Byonghu

AU - Choi, Jong Min

AU - Choi, Hangseok

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - The effective thermal conductivity of six vertical closed-loop ground heat exchangers (GHEXs), which were installed in a test bed located in Wonju, South Korea, has been experimentally evaluated by performing in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs). To compare the thermal efficiency of the GHEXs in field, various installation conditions are considered such as different grouting materials (cement vs. bentonite), different additives (silica sand vs. graphite) and shapes of the circulating pipe-section (conventional U-loop type vs. 3-pipe type). From the test results, it can be concluded that the cement grout has higher effective thermal conductivity than the bentonite grout by 7.4-10.1%, and the graphite outperforms the silica sand by 6.7-9.1% as a thermally-enhancing additive. In addition, the new 3-pipe type heat exchange pipe that yields less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipes shows better thermal performance over the conventional U-loop type heat exchange pipe by 14.1-14.5%. Based on the results from the in-situ thermal response tests, a series of cost analyses has been carried out to show the applicability of the cement grouting, the graphite additive, and the new 3-pipe type of heat exchange pipe section. For the same condition, the cement grouting can reduce the construction cost of GHEXs by around 40% in the given cost analysis scenario. In addition, an addition of graphite and use the new 3-pipe heat exchange pipe lead to about 8% and 6% cost reduction, respectively.

AB - The effective thermal conductivity of six vertical closed-loop ground heat exchangers (GHEXs), which were installed in a test bed located in Wonju, South Korea, has been experimentally evaluated by performing in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs). To compare the thermal efficiency of the GHEXs in field, various installation conditions are considered such as different grouting materials (cement vs. bentonite), different additives (silica sand vs. graphite) and shapes of the circulating pipe-section (conventional U-loop type vs. 3-pipe type). From the test results, it can be concluded that the cement grout has higher effective thermal conductivity than the bentonite grout by 7.4-10.1%, and the graphite outperforms the silica sand by 6.7-9.1% as a thermally-enhancing additive. In addition, the new 3-pipe type heat exchange pipe that yields less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipes shows better thermal performance over the conventional U-loop type heat exchange pipe by 14.1-14.5%. Based on the results from the in-situ thermal response tests, a series of cost analyses has been carried out to show the applicability of the cement grouting, the graphite additive, and the new 3-pipe type of heat exchange pipe section. For the same condition, the cement grouting can reduce the construction cost of GHEXs by around 40% in the given cost analysis scenario. In addition, an addition of graphite and use the new 3-pipe heat exchange pipe lead to about 8% and 6% cost reduction, respectively.

KW - Ground heat exchanger

KW - In-situ thermal response test

KW - Thermal conductivity

KW - Thermal interference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855558247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855558247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.013

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84855558247

VL - 42

SP - 77

EP - 83

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

SN - 0960-1481

ER -