Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving

Uijong Ju, June Kang, Christian Wallraven

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding how humans make decisions in challenging situations - such as trying to save peoples' lives even though this endangers one's own life - is crucial in optimizing rescue operations and dealing with natural disasters and other crises. The experimental study of these decisions, however, has often been done using text-based surveys, which is known to emphasize rational and reflective judgments. Here, we used virtual reality to investigate decision-making in a real-world context, in which a decision needs to be made intuitively under time pressure - for this we simulated an accident situation in an immersive virtual driving scenario. In the scenario, participants were told to race a course as fast as possible. After training, participants were confronted with the sudden appearance of pedestrians on the race course. We observed three different behaviors: group one ignored the pedestrians and/or hit the accelerator, group two hit the brake, and group three tried to steer the car to avoid pedestrians. We found that most Avoid-group participants had more real and virtual driving experience compared to the other two groups and they also felt more competent during the game as measured by subjective game experience questionnaires. Importantly, results from established personality questionnaires showed that participants who did not brake (therefore potentially harming the pedestrians) had significantly lower scores in perspective-taking and higher scores in psychopathy compared to participants who tried to avoid the accident situation. Our results demonstrate that personality differences to some degree are able to predict intuitive decision-making and that such processes can be studied in a controlled, immersive VR simulation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages77-82
Number of pages6
Volume2016-July
ISBN (Electronic)9781509008360
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jul 5
Event18th IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Greenville, United States
Duration: 2016 Mar 192016 Mar 23

Other

Other18th IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016
CountryUnited States
CityGreenville
Period16/3/1916/3/23

Fingerprint

Brakes
Accidents
Decision making
Disasters
Virtual reality
Particle accelerators
Railroad cars

Keywords

  • decision-making
  • driving Simulation
  • moral judgments
  • personality differences
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Ju, U., Kang, J., & Wallraven, C. (2016). Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings (Vol. 2016-July, pp. 77-82). [7504690] IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504690

Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving. / Ju, Uijong; Kang, June; Wallraven, Christian.

2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings. Vol. 2016-July IEEE Computer Society, 2016. p. 77-82 7504690.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ju, U, Kang, J & Wallraven, C 2016, Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving. in 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings. vol. 2016-July, 7504690, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 77-82, 18th IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016, Greenville, United States, 16/3/19. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504690
Ju U, Kang J, Wallraven C. Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings. Vol. 2016-July. IEEE Computer Society. 2016. p. 77-82. 7504690 https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504690
Ju, Uijong ; Kang, June ; Wallraven, Christian. / Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving. 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings. Vol. 2016-July IEEE Computer Society, 2016. pp. 77-82
@inproceedings{810e2f9e1b16469ba4ce2d8c353ed761,
title = "Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving",
abstract = "Understanding how humans make decisions in challenging situations - such as trying to save peoples' lives even though this endangers one's own life - is crucial in optimizing rescue operations and dealing with natural disasters and other crises. The experimental study of these decisions, however, has often been done using text-based surveys, which is known to emphasize rational and reflective judgments. Here, we used virtual reality to investigate decision-making in a real-world context, in which a decision needs to be made intuitively under time pressure - for this we simulated an accident situation in an immersive virtual driving scenario. In the scenario, participants were told to race a course as fast as possible. After training, participants were confronted with the sudden appearance of pedestrians on the race course. We observed three different behaviors: group one ignored the pedestrians and/or hit the accelerator, group two hit the brake, and group three tried to steer the car to avoid pedestrians. We found that most Avoid-group participants had more real and virtual driving experience compared to the other two groups and they also felt more competent during the game as measured by subjective game experience questionnaires. Importantly, results from established personality questionnaires showed that participants who did not brake (therefore potentially harming the pedestrians) had significantly lower scores in perspective-taking and higher scores in psychopathy compared to participants who tried to avoid the accident situation. Our results demonstrate that personality differences to some degree are able to predict intuitive decision-making and that such processes can be studied in a controlled, immersive VR simulation.",
keywords = "decision-making, driving Simulation, moral judgments, personality differences, Virtual reality",
author = "Uijong Ju and June Kang and Christian Wallraven",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1109/VR.2016.7504690",
language = "English",
volume = "2016-July",
pages = "77--82",
booktitle = "2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Personality differences predict decision-making in an accident situation in virtual driving

AU - Ju, Uijong

AU - Kang, June

AU - Wallraven, Christian

PY - 2016/7/5

Y1 - 2016/7/5

N2 - Understanding how humans make decisions in challenging situations - such as trying to save peoples' lives even though this endangers one's own life - is crucial in optimizing rescue operations and dealing with natural disasters and other crises. The experimental study of these decisions, however, has often been done using text-based surveys, which is known to emphasize rational and reflective judgments. Here, we used virtual reality to investigate decision-making in a real-world context, in which a decision needs to be made intuitively under time pressure - for this we simulated an accident situation in an immersive virtual driving scenario. In the scenario, participants were told to race a course as fast as possible. After training, participants were confronted with the sudden appearance of pedestrians on the race course. We observed three different behaviors: group one ignored the pedestrians and/or hit the accelerator, group two hit the brake, and group three tried to steer the car to avoid pedestrians. We found that most Avoid-group participants had more real and virtual driving experience compared to the other two groups and they also felt more competent during the game as measured by subjective game experience questionnaires. Importantly, results from established personality questionnaires showed that participants who did not brake (therefore potentially harming the pedestrians) had significantly lower scores in perspective-taking and higher scores in psychopathy compared to participants who tried to avoid the accident situation. Our results demonstrate that personality differences to some degree are able to predict intuitive decision-making and that such processes can be studied in a controlled, immersive VR simulation.

AB - Understanding how humans make decisions in challenging situations - such as trying to save peoples' lives even though this endangers one's own life - is crucial in optimizing rescue operations and dealing with natural disasters and other crises. The experimental study of these decisions, however, has often been done using text-based surveys, which is known to emphasize rational and reflective judgments. Here, we used virtual reality to investigate decision-making in a real-world context, in which a decision needs to be made intuitively under time pressure - for this we simulated an accident situation in an immersive virtual driving scenario. In the scenario, participants were told to race a course as fast as possible. After training, participants were confronted with the sudden appearance of pedestrians on the race course. We observed three different behaviors: group one ignored the pedestrians and/or hit the accelerator, group two hit the brake, and group three tried to steer the car to avoid pedestrians. We found that most Avoid-group participants had more real and virtual driving experience compared to the other two groups and they also felt more competent during the game as measured by subjective game experience questionnaires. Importantly, results from established personality questionnaires showed that participants who did not brake (therefore potentially harming the pedestrians) had significantly lower scores in perspective-taking and higher scores in psychopathy compared to participants who tried to avoid the accident situation. Our results demonstrate that personality differences to some degree are able to predict intuitive decision-making and that such processes can be studied in a controlled, immersive VR simulation.

KW - decision-making

KW - driving Simulation

KW - moral judgments

KW - personality differences

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979780173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979780173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/VR.2016.7504690

DO - 10.1109/VR.2016.7504690

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84979780173

VL - 2016-July

SP - 77

EP - 82

BT - 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2016 - Proceedings

PB - IEEE Computer Society

ER -