Pilot adaptation to different classes of haptic aids in tracking tasks

Mario Olivari, Frank M. Nieuwenhuizen, Heinrich Bulthoff, Lorenzo Pollini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Haptic aids have been largely used in manual control tasks to complement the visual information through the sense of touch. To analytically design a haptic aid, adequate knowledge is needed about how pilots adapt their visual response and the biomechanical properties of their arm (i.e., admittance) to a generic haptic aid. In this work, two different haptic aids, a direct haptic aid and an indirect haptic aid, are designed for a target tracking task, with the aim of investigating the pilot response to these aids. The direct haptic aid provides forces on the control device that suggest the right control action to the pilot, whereas the indirect haptic aid provides forces opposite in sign with respect to the direct haptic aid. The direct haptic aid and the indirect haptic aid were tested in an experimental setup with nonpilot participants and compared to a condition without haptic support. It was found that control performance improved with haptic aids. Participants significantly adapted both their admittance and visual response to fully exploit the haptic aids. They were more compliant with the direct haptic aid force, whereas they showed stiffer neuromuscular settings with the indirect haptic aid, as this approach required opposing the haptic forces.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1741-1753
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Haptics
aid
electrical impedance
Manual control
manual control
Target tracking
control equipment
touch
complement
Class
Target Tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Pilot adaptation to different classes of haptic aids in tracking tasks. / Olivari, Mario; Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M.; Bulthoff, Heinrich; Pollini, Lorenzo.

In: Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.11.2014, p. 1741-1753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olivari, Mario ; Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M. ; Bulthoff, Heinrich ; Pollini, Lorenzo. / Pilot adaptation to different classes of haptic aids in tracking tasks. In: Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 2014 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 1741-1753.
@article{e6d86d94efa44e4b81f85ab701ad914d,
title = "Pilot adaptation to different classes of haptic aids in tracking tasks",
abstract = "Haptic aids have been largely used in manual control tasks to complement the visual information through the sense of touch. To analytically design a haptic aid, adequate knowledge is needed about how pilots adapt their visual response and the biomechanical properties of their arm (i.e., admittance) to a generic haptic aid. In this work, two different haptic aids, a direct haptic aid and an indirect haptic aid, are designed for a target tracking task, with the aim of investigating the pilot response to these aids. The direct haptic aid provides forces on the control device that suggest the right control action to the pilot, whereas the indirect haptic aid provides forces opposite in sign with respect to the direct haptic aid. The direct haptic aid and the indirect haptic aid were tested in an experimental setup with nonpilot participants and compared to a condition without haptic support. It was found that control performance improved with haptic aids. Participants significantly adapted both their admittance and visual response to fully exploit the haptic aids. They were more compliant with the direct haptic aid force, whereas they showed stiffer neuromuscular settings with the indirect haptic aid, as this approach required opposing the haptic forces.",
author = "Mario Olivari and Nieuwenhuizen, {Frank M.} and Heinrich Bulthoff and Lorenzo Pollini",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/1.G000534",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1741--1753",
journal = "Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics",
issn = "0731-5090",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pilot adaptation to different classes of haptic aids in tracking tasks

AU - Olivari, Mario

AU - Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M.

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

AU - Pollini, Lorenzo

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Haptic aids have been largely used in manual control tasks to complement the visual information through the sense of touch. To analytically design a haptic aid, adequate knowledge is needed about how pilots adapt their visual response and the biomechanical properties of their arm (i.e., admittance) to a generic haptic aid. In this work, two different haptic aids, a direct haptic aid and an indirect haptic aid, are designed for a target tracking task, with the aim of investigating the pilot response to these aids. The direct haptic aid provides forces on the control device that suggest the right control action to the pilot, whereas the indirect haptic aid provides forces opposite in sign with respect to the direct haptic aid. The direct haptic aid and the indirect haptic aid were tested in an experimental setup with nonpilot participants and compared to a condition without haptic support. It was found that control performance improved with haptic aids. Participants significantly adapted both their admittance and visual response to fully exploit the haptic aids. They were more compliant with the direct haptic aid force, whereas they showed stiffer neuromuscular settings with the indirect haptic aid, as this approach required opposing the haptic forces.

AB - Haptic aids have been largely used in manual control tasks to complement the visual information through the sense of touch. To analytically design a haptic aid, adequate knowledge is needed about how pilots adapt their visual response and the biomechanical properties of their arm (i.e., admittance) to a generic haptic aid. In this work, two different haptic aids, a direct haptic aid and an indirect haptic aid, are designed for a target tracking task, with the aim of investigating the pilot response to these aids. The direct haptic aid provides forces on the control device that suggest the right control action to the pilot, whereas the indirect haptic aid provides forces opposite in sign with respect to the direct haptic aid. The direct haptic aid and the indirect haptic aid were tested in an experimental setup with nonpilot participants and compared to a condition without haptic support. It was found that control performance improved with haptic aids. Participants significantly adapted both their admittance and visual response to fully exploit the haptic aids. They were more compliant with the direct haptic aid force, whereas they showed stiffer neuromuscular settings with the indirect haptic aid, as this approach required opposing the haptic forces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988410895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988410895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/1.G000534

DO - 10.2514/1.G000534

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988410895

VL - 37

SP - 1741

EP - 1753

JO - Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics

JF - Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics

SN - 0731-5090

IS - 6

ER -