Politics, welfare regimes, and population health

Controversies and evidence

Carles Muntaner, Carme Borrell, Edwin Ng, Haejoo Chung, Albert Espelt, Maica Rodriguez-Sanz, Joan Benach, Patricia O'Campo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, a research area has emerged within social determinants of health that examines the role of politics, expressed as political traditions/parties and welfare state characteristics, on population health. To better understand and synthesise this growing body of evidence, the present literature review, informed by a political economy of health and welfare regimes framework, located 73 empirical and comparative studies on politics and health, meeting our inclusion criteria in three databases: PubMed (1948-), Sociological Abstracts (1953-), and ISI Web of Science (1900 We identified two major research programmes, welfare regimes and democracy, and two emerging programmes, political tradition and globalisation. Primary findings include: (1) left and egalitarian political traditions on population health are the most salutary, consistent, and substantial; (2) the health impacts of advanced and liberal democracies are also positive and large; (3) welfare regime studies, primarily conducted among wealthy countries, find that social democratic regimes tend to fare best with absolute health outcomes yet consistently in terms of relative health inequalities; and (4) globalisation defined as dependency indicators such as trade, foreign investment, and national debt is negatively associated with population health. We end by discussing epistemological, theoretical, and methodological issues for consideration for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)946-964
Number of pages19
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Politics
welfare
politics
Health
health
Population
evidence
Democracy
Internationality
Social Determinants of Health
globalization
democracy
political program
national debt
Population Characteristics
party state
Research
PubMed
foreign investment
welfare state

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Globalisation
  • Political tradition
  • Politics
  • Population health
  • Welfare state

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Muntaner, C., Borrell, C., Ng, E., Chung, H., Espelt, A., Rodriguez-Sanz, M., ... O'Campo, P. (2011). Politics, welfare regimes, and population health: Controversies and evidence. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(6), 946-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01339.x

Politics, welfare regimes, and population health : Controversies and evidence. / Muntaner, Carles; Borrell, Carme; Ng, Edwin; Chung, Haejoo; Espelt, Albert; Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica; Benach, Joan; O'Campo, Patricia.

In: Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.09.2011, p. 946-964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muntaner, C, Borrell, C, Ng, E, Chung, H, Espelt, A, Rodriguez-Sanz, M, Benach, J & O'Campo, P 2011, 'Politics, welfare regimes, and population health: Controversies and evidence', Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 946-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01339.x
Muntaner, Carles ; Borrell, Carme ; Ng, Edwin ; Chung, Haejoo ; Espelt, Albert ; Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica ; Benach, Joan ; O'Campo, Patricia. / Politics, welfare regimes, and population health : Controversies and evidence. In: Sociology of Health and Illness. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 946-964.
@article{52ae98b5a2f84d44bdd99c5f36b0b7c7,
title = "Politics, welfare regimes, and population health: Controversies and evidence",
abstract = "In recent years, a research area has emerged within social determinants of health that examines the role of politics, expressed as political traditions/parties and welfare state characteristics, on population health. To better understand and synthesise this growing body of evidence, the present literature review, informed by a political economy of health and welfare regimes framework, located 73 empirical and comparative studies on politics and health, meeting our inclusion criteria in three databases: PubMed (1948-), Sociological Abstracts (1953-), and ISI Web of Science (1900 We identified two major research programmes, welfare regimes and democracy, and two emerging programmes, political tradition and globalisation. Primary findings include: (1) left and egalitarian political traditions on population health are the most salutary, consistent, and substantial; (2) the health impacts of advanced and liberal democracies are also positive and large; (3) welfare regime studies, primarily conducted among wealthy countries, find that social democratic regimes tend to fare best with absolute health outcomes yet consistently in terms of relative health inequalities; and (4) globalisation defined as dependency indicators such as trade, foreign investment, and national debt is negatively associated with population health. We end by discussing epistemological, theoretical, and methodological issues for consideration for future research.",
keywords = "Democracy, Globalisation, Political tradition, Politics, Population health, Welfare state",
author = "Carles Muntaner and Carme Borrell and Edwin Ng and Haejoo Chung and Albert Espelt and Maica Rodriguez-Sanz and Joan Benach and Patricia O'Campo",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01339.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "946--964",
journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
issn = "0141-9889",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politics, welfare regimes, and population health

T2 - Controversies and evidence

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Borrell, Carme

AU - Ng, Edwin

AU - Chung, Haejoo

AU - Espelt, Albert

AU - Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica

AU - Benach, Joan

AU - O'Campo, Patricia

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - In recent years, a research area has emerged within social determinants of health that examines the role of politics, expressed as political traditions/parties and welfare state characteristics, on population health. To better understand and synthesise this growing body of evidence, the present literature review, informed by a political economy of health and welfare regimes framework, located 73 empirical and comparative studies on politics and health, meeting our inclusion criteria in three databases: PubMed (1948-), Sociological Abstracts (1953-), and ISI Web of Science (1900 We identified two major research programmes, welfare regimes and democracy, and two emerging programmes, political tradition and globalisation. Primary findings include: (1) left and egalitarian political traditions on population health are the most salutary, consistent, and substantial; (2) the health impacts of advanced and liberal democracies are also positive and large; (3) welfare regime studies, primarily conducted among wealthy countries, find that social democratic regimes tend to fare best with absolute health outcomes yet consistently in terms of relative health inequalities; and (4) globalisation defined as dependency indicators such as trade, foreign investment, and national debt is negatively associated with population health. We end by discussing epistemological, theoretical, and methodological issues for consideration for future research.

AB - In recent years, a research area has emerged within social determinants of health that examines the role of politics, expressed as political traditions/parties and welfare state characteristics, on population health. To better understand and synthesise this growing body of evidence, the present literature review, informed by a political economy of health and welfare regimes framework, located 73 empirical and comparative studies on politics and health, meeting our inclusion criteria in three databases: PubMed (1948-), Sociological Abstracts (1953-), and ISI Web of Science (1900 We identified two major research programmes, welfare regimes and democracy, and two emerging programmes, political tradition and globalisation. Primary findings include: (1) left and egalitarian political traditions on population health are the most salutary, consistent, and substantial; (2) the health impacts of advanced and liberal democracies are also positive and large; (3) welfare regime studies, primarily conducted among wealthy countries, find that social democratic regimes tend to fare best with absolute health outcomes yet consistently in terms of relative health inequalities; and (4) globalisation defined as dependency indicators such as trade, foreign investment, and national debt is negatively associated with population health. We end by discussing epistemological, theoretical, and methodological issues for consideration for future research.

KW - Democracy

KW - Globalisation

KW - Political tradition

KW - Politics

KW - Population health

KW - Welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959354128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959354128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01339.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01339.x

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 946

EP - 964

JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

SN - 0141-9889

IS - 6

ER -