Prognostic impact of Charlson comorbidity index obtained from medical records and claims data on 1-year mortality and length of stay in gastric cancer patients

Min Ho Kyung, Seok-Jun Yoon, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Se Min Hwang, Hyun Ju Seo, Kyoung Hoon Kim, Hyeung Keun Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives : We tried to evaluate the agreement of the Charlson comorbidity index values (CCI) obtained from different sources (medical records and National Health Insurance claims data) for gastric cancer patients. We also attempted to assess the prognostic value of these data for predicting 1-year mortality and length of the hospital stay (length of stay). Methods : Medical records of 284 gastric cancer patients were reviewed, and their National Health Insurance claims data and death certificates were also investigated. To evaluate agreement, the kappa coefficient was tested. Multiple logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to evaluate and compare the prognostic power for predicting 1 year mortality and length of stay. Results : The CCI values for each comorbid condition obtained from 2 different data sources appeared to poorly agree (kappa: 0.00-0.59). It was appeared that the CCI values based on both sources were not valid prognostic indicators of 1-year mortality. Only medical record-based CCI was a valid prognostic indicator of length of stay, even after adjustment of covariables ( = 0.112, 95% CI = [0.017-1.267]). Conclusions : There was a discrepancy between the data sources with regard to the value of CCI both for the prognostic power and its direction. Therefore, assuming that medical records are the gold standard for the source for CCI measurement, claims data is not an appropriate source for determining the CCI, at least for gastric cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-122
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Stomach Neoplasms
Medical Records
Comorbidity
Length of Stay
Mortality
Information Storage and Retrieval
National Health Programs
Regression Analysis
Death Certificates
Linear Models
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Charlson comorbidity index
  • Claims data
  • Length of stay
  • Medical records
  • Mortality
  • Stomach neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Prognostic impact of Charlson comorbidity index obtained from medical records and claims data on 1-year mortality and length of stay in gastric cancer patients. / Kyung, Min Ho; Yoon, Seok-Jun; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Hwang, Se Min; Seo, Hyun Ju; Kim, Kyoung Hoon; Park, Hyeung Keun.

In: Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.03.2009, p. 117-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77db785e292742c6a908aa12c7b2336a,
title = "Prognostic impact of Charlson comorbidity index obtained from medical records and claims data on 1-year mortality and length of stay in gastric cancer patients",
abstract = "Objectives : We tried to evaluate the agreement of the Charlson comorbidity index values (CCI) obtained from different sources (medical records and National Health Insurance claims data) for gastric cancer patients. We also attempted to assess the prognostic value of these data for predicting 1-year mortality and length of the hospital stay (length of stay). Methods : Medical records of 284 gastric cancer patients were reviewed, and their National Health Insurance claims data and death certificates were also investigated. To evaluate agreement, the kappa coefficient was tested. Multiple logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to evaluate and compare the prognostic power for predicting 1 year mortality and length of stay. Results : The CCI values for each comorbid condition obtained from 2 different data sources appeared to poorly agree (kappa: 0.00-0.59). It was appeared that the CCI values based on both sources were not valid prognostic indicators of 1-year mortality. Only medical record-based CCI was a valid prognostic indicator of length of stay, even after adjustment of covariables ( = 0.112, 95{\%} CI = [0.017-1.267]). Conclusions : There was a discrepancy between the data sources with regard to the value of CCI both for the prognostic power and its direction. Therefore, assuming that medical records are the gold standard for the source for CCI measurement, claims data is not an appropriate source for determining the CCI, at least for gastric cancer.",
keywords = "Charlson comorbidity index, Claims data, Length of stay, Medical records, Mortality, Stomach neoplasms",
author = "Kyung, {Min Ho} and Seok-Jun Yoon and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Hwang, {Se Min} and Seo, {Hyun Ju} and Kim, {Kyoung Hoon} and Park, {Hyeung Keun}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.117",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "117--122",
journal = "Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health",
issn = "1975-8375",
publisher = "Korean Society for Preventive Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic impact of Charlson comorbidity index obtained from medical records and claims data on 1-year mortality and length of stay in gastric cancer patients

AU - Kyung, Min Ho

AU - Yoon, Seok-Jun

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - Hwang, Se Min

AU - Seo, Hyun Ju

AU - Kim, Kyoung Hoon

AU - Park, Hyeung Keun

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - Objectives : We tried to evaluate the agreement of the Charlson comorbidity index values (CCI) obtained from different sources (medical records and National Health Insurance claims data) for gastric cancer patients. We also attempted to assess the prognostic value of these data for predicting 1-year mortality and length of the hospital stay (length of stay). Methods : Medical records of 284 gastric cancer patients were reviewed, and their National Health Insurance claims data and death certificates were also investigated. To evaluate agreement, the kappa coefficient was tested. Multiple logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to evaluate and compare the prognostic power for predicting 1 year mortality and length of stay. Results : The CCI values for each comorbid condition obtained from 2 different data sources appeared to poorly agree (kappa: 0.00-0.59). It was appeared that the CCI values based on both sources were not valid prognostic indicators of 1-year mortality. Only medical record-based CCI was a valid prognostic indicator of length of stay, even after adjustment of covariables ( = 0.112, 95% CI = [0.017-1.267]). Conclusions : There was a discrepancy between the data sources with regard to the value of CCI both for the prognostic power and its direction. Therefore, assuming that medical records are the gold standard for the source for CCI measurement, claims data is not an appropriate source for determining the CCI, at least for gastric cancer.

AB - Objectives : We tried to evaluate the agreement of the Charlson comorbidity index values (CCI) obtained from different sources (medical records and National Health Insurance claims data) for gastric cancer patients. We also attempted to assess the prognostic value of these data for predicting 1-year mortality and length of the hospital stay (length of stay). Methods : Medical records of 284 gastric cancer patients were reviewed, and their National Health Insurance claims data and death certificates were also investigated. To evaluate agreement, the kappa coefficient was tested. Multiple logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to evaluate and compare the prognostic power for predicting 1 year mortality and length of stay. Results : The CCI values for each comorbid condition obtained from 2 different data sources appeared to poorly agree (kappa: 0.00-0.59). It was appeared that the CCI values based on both sources were not valid prognostic indicators of 1-year mortality. Only medical record-based CCI was a valid prognostic indicator of length of stay, even after adjustment of covariables ( = 0.112, 95% CI = [0.017-1.267]). Conclusions : There was a discrepancy between the data sources with regard to the value of CCI both for the prognostic power and its direction. Therefore, assuming that medical records are the gold standard for the source for CCI measurement, claims data is not an appropriate source for determining the CCI, at least for gastric cancer.

KW - Charlson comorbidity index

KW - Claims data

KW - Length of stay

KW - Medical records

KW - Mortality

KW - Stomach neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649528674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649528674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.117

DO - 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.117

M3 - Article

C2 - 19349741

AN - SCOPUS:67649528674

VL - 42

SP - 117

EP - 122

JO - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

JF - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

SN - 1975-8375

IS - 2

ER -