Psychosocial work environment and health in U.S. metropolitan areas: A test of the demand-control and demand-control-support models

Carles Muntaner, C. Schoenbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors use confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the psychosocial dimensions of work environments relevant to health outcomes, in a representative sample of five U.S. metropolitan areas. Through an aggregated inference system, scales from Schwartz and associates' job scoring system and from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) were employed to examine two alternative models: the demand-control model of Karasek and Theorell and Johnson's demand-control-support model. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the two models. The two multidimensional models yielded better fits than an unstructured model. After allowing for the measurement error variance due to the method of assessment (Schwartz and associates' system or DOT), both models yielded acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, but the fit of the demand-control-support model was significantly better. Overall these results indicate that the dimensions of Control (substantive complexity of work, skill discretion, decision authority), Demands (physical exertion, physical demands and hazards), and Social Support (coworker and supervisor social supports) provide an acceptable account of the psychosocial dimensions of work associated with health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-353
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Health Services
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1994 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

work environment
agglomeration area
Social Support
Statistical Factor Analysis
demand
Health
health
Physical Exertion
dictionary
social support
factor analysis
co-worker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Psychosocial work environment and health in U.S. metropolitan areas : A test of the demand-control and demand-control-support models. / Muntaner, Carles; Schoenbach, C.

In: International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.01.1994, p. 337-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1bc6d0b1bc574bbe8267037d41ecf488,
title = "Psychosocial work environment and health in U.S. metropolitan areas: A test of the demand-control and demand-control-support models",
abstract = "The authors use confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the psychosocial dimensions of work environments relevant to health outcomes, in a representative sample of five U.S. metropolitan areas. Through an aggregated inference system, scales from Schwartz and associates' job scoring system and from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) were employed to examine two alternative models: the demand-control model of Karasek and Theorell and Johnson's demand-control-support model. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the two models. The two multidimensional models yielded better fits than an unstructured model. After allowing for the measurement error variance due to the method of assessment (Schwartz and associates' system or DOT), both models yielded acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, but the fit of the demand-control-support model was significantly better. Overall these results indicate that the dimensions of Control (substantive complexity of work, skill discretion, decision authority), Demands (physical exertion, physical demands and hazards), and Social Support (coworker and supervisor social supports) provide an acceptable account of the psychosocial dimensions of work associated with health outcomes.",
author = "Carles Muntaner and C. Schoenbach",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "337--353",
journal = "International Journal of Health Services",
issn = "0020-7314",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosocial work environment and health in U.S. metropolitan areas

T2 - A test of the demand-control and demand-control-support models

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Schoenbach, C.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - The authors use confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the psychosocial dimensions of work environments relevant to health outcomes, in a representative sample of five U.S. metropolitan areas. Through an aggregated inference system, scales from Schwartz and associates' job scoring system and from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) were employed to examine two alternative models: the demand-control model of Karasek and Theorell and Johnson's demand-control-support model. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the two models. The two multidimensional models yielded better fits than an unstructured model. After allowing for the measurement error variance due to the method of assessment (Schwartz and associates' system or DOT), both models yielded acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, but the fit of the demand-control-support model was significantly better. Overall these results indicate that the dimensions of Control (substantive complexity of work, skill discretion, decision authority), Demands (physical exertion, physical demands and hazards), and Social Support (coworker and supervisor social supports) provide an acceptable account of the psychosocial dimensions of work associated with health outcomes.

AB - The authors use confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the psychosocial dimensions of work environments relevant to health outcomes, in a representative sample of five U.S. metropolitan areas. Through an aggregated inference system, scales from Schwartz and associates' job scoring system and from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) were employed to examine two alternative models: the demand-control model of Karasek and Theorell and Johnson's demand-control-support model. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the two models. The two multidimensional models yielded better fits than an unstructured model. After allowing for the measurement error variance due to the method of assessment (Schwartz and associates' system or DOT), both models yielded acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, but the fit of the demand-control-support model was significantly better. Overall these results indicate that the dimensions of Control (substantive complexity of work, skill discretion, decision authority), Demands (physical exertion, physical demands and hazards), and Social Support (coworker and supervisor social supports) provide an acceptable account of the psychosocial dimensions of work associated with health outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028302941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028302941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8034396

AN - SCOPUS:0028302941

VL - 24

SP - 337

EP - 353

JO - International Journal of Health Services

JF - International Journal of Health Services

SN - 0020-7314

IS - 2

ER -