Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and CT: A phantom study

S. S. Shim, Yu Whan Oh, K. A. Kong, Y. J. Ryu, Y. Kim, D. H. Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective:We compared digital tomosynthesis (TOMO) and chest CT in terms of assessing the sizes of nodules located in zones where evaluation by simple radiography is limited. Methods: A total of 48 images comprising phantom nodules of four sizes in six different locations were used. Nodule size measurement errors for measurements using TOMO and CT images compared with the actual size from each observer were calculated. The inter-and intraobserver repeatability of the measured values and the agreement between the two techniques were assessed using the method described by Bland and Altman. Results: The mean measurement errors for all of the nodules and four observers were 20.84mm [standard deviation (SD), 0.60mm] on TOMO and 20.18mm (SD, 0.71mm) on CT images. The mean measurement errors for the different observers ranged from 21.11 to 20.55mm for TOMO and from 20.39 to 0.08mm for CT. Assessing the agreement between nodule size measurements using TOMO and CT resulted in mean measurement errors of 20.65mm, with a 95% limit of agreement of 22.53 to 1.22mm for comparison of TOMO with CT. Conclusion: Our results suggest that nodule sizes obtained using TOMO and chest CT are comparable, even for nodules located in areas where the size measurement is limited on simple radiography. Advances in knowledge: TOMO and CT can be used interchangeably, even for nodules located in a blind area on simple radiography.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20140040
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume88
Issue number1047
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Radiography
Thorax
Lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and CT : A phantom study. / Shim, S. S.; Oh, Yu Whan; Kong, K. A.; Ryu, Y. J.; Kim, Y.; Jang, D. H.

In: British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 88, No. 1047, 20140040, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shim, S. S. ; Oh, Yu Whan ; Kong, K. A. ; Ryu, Y. J. ; Kim, Y. ; Jang, D. H. / Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and CT : A phantom study. In: British Journal of Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 88, No. 1047.
@article{7991584c29954ae7b9ff80efdc4e5b75,
title = "Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and CT: A phantom study",
abstract = "Objective:We compared digital tomosynthesis (TOMO) and chest CT in terms of assessing the sizes of nodules located in zones where evaluation by simple radiography is limited. Methods: A total of 48 images comprising phantom nodules of four sizes in six different locations were used. Nodule size measurement errors for measurements using TOMO and CT images compared with the actual size from each observer were calculated. The inter-and intraobserver repeatability of the measured values and the agreement between the two techniques were assessed using the method described by Bland and Altman. Results: The mean measurement errors for all of the nodules and four observers were 20.84mm [standard deviation (SD), 0.60mm] on TOMO and 20.18mm (SD, 0.71mm) on CT images. The mean measurement errors for the different observers ranged from 21.11 to 20.55mm for TOMO and from 20.39 to 0.08mm for CT. Assessing the agreement between nodule size measurements using TOMO and CT resulted in mean measurement errors of 20.65mm, with a 95{\%} limit of agreement of 22.53 to 1.22mm for comparison of TOMO with CT. Conclusion: Our results suggest that nodule sizes obtained using TOMO and chest CT are comparable, even for nodules located in areas where the size measurement is limited on simple radiography. Advances in knowledge: TOMO and CT can be used interchangeably, even for nodules located in a blind area on simple radiography.",
author = "Shim, {S. S.} and Oh, {Yu Whan} and Kong, {K. A.} and Ryu, {Y. J.} and Y. Kim and Jang, {D. H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1259/bjr.20140040",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
journal = "The British journal of radiology.",
issn = "0007-1285",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "1047",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and CT

T2 - A phantom study

AU - Shim, S. S.

AU - Oh, Yu Whan

AU - Kong, K. A.

AU - Ryu, Y. J.

AU - Kim, Y.

AU - Jang, D. H.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective:We compared digital tomosynthesis (TOMO) and chest CT in terms of assessing the sizes of nodules located in zones where evaluation by simple radiography is limited. Methods: A total of 48 images comprising phantom nodules of four sizes in six different locations were used. Nodule size measurement errors for measurements using TOMO and CT images compared with the actual size from each observer were calculated. The inter-and intraobserver repeatability of the measured values and the agreement between the two techniques were assessed using the method described by Bland and Altman. Results: The mean measurement errors for all of the nodules and four observers were 20.84mm [standard deviation (SD), 0.60mm] on TOMO and 20.18mm (SD, 0.71mm) on CT images. The mean measurement errors for the different observers ranged from 21.11 to 20.55mm for TOMO and from 20.39 to 0.08mm for CT. Assessing the agreement between nodule size measurements using TOMO and CT resulted in mean measurement errors of 20.65mm, with a 95% limit of agreement of 22.53 to 1.22mm for comparison of TOMO with CT. Conclusion: Our results suggest that nodule sizes obtained using TOMO and chest CT are comparable, even for nodules located in areas where the size measurement is limited on simple radiography. Advances in knowledge: TOMO and CT can be used interchangeably, even for nodules located in a blind area on simple radiography.

AB - Objective:We compared digital tomosynthesis (TOMO) and chest CT in terms of assessing the sizes of nodules located in zones where evaluation by simple radiography is limited. Methods: A total of 48 images comprising phantom nodules of four sizes in six different locations were used. Nodule size measurement errors for measurements using TOMO and CT images compared with the actual size from each observer were calculated. The inter-and intraobserver repeatability of the measured values and the agreement between the two techniques were assessed using the method described by Bland and Altman. Results: The mean measurement errors for all of the nodules and four observers were 20.84mm [standard deviation (SD), 0.60mm] on TOMO and 20.18mm (SD, 0.71mm) on CT images. The mean measurement errors for the different observers ranged from 21.11 to 20.55mm for TOMO and from 20.39 to 0.08mm for CT. Assessing the agreement between nodule size measurements using TOMO and CT resulted in mean measurement errors of 20.65mm, with a 95% limit of agreement of 22.53 to 1.22mm for comparison of TOMO with CT. Conclusion: Our results suggest that nodule sizes obtained using TOMO and chest CT are comparable, even for nodules located in areas where the size measurement is limited on simple radiography. Advances in knowledge: TOMO and CT can be used interchangeably, even for nodules located in a blind area on simple radiography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923522530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923522530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20140040

DO - 10.1259/bjr.20140040

M3 - Article

C2 - 25605344

AN - SCOPUS:84923522530

VL - 88

JO - The British journal of radiology.

JF - The British journal of radiology.

SN - 0007-1285

IS - 1047

M1 - 20140040

ER -