TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantification of Uncertainty in Projections of Extreme Daily Precipitation
AU - Kim, Seokhyeon
AU - Eghdamirad, Sajjad
AU - Sharma, Ashish
AU - Kim, Joong Hoon
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under a Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF‐2019R1A2B5B03069810). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modeling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making their model output available. For CMIP, the U.S. Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under a Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF-2019R1A2B5B03069810). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modeling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making their model output available. For CMIP, the U.S. Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. The Authors.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Projections of extreme precipitation are of considerable interest in a range of design and management applications. These projections, however, can exhibit uncertainty that requires quantification to provide confidence to any application they are used in. This study assesses the uncertainty in projected extreme daily precipitation, separated into model, scenario, and ensemble components using the square root error variance (SREV) rationale. For this, 45 projections of daily precipitation from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) are used, consisting of multiple global circulation models and their ensemble members, for a range of Representative Concentration Pathways, allowing assessment across land-covered areas worldwide. It is found that the uncertainty in dry regions is significantly higher compared to wet regions, raising concerns regarding infrastructure design for the future in arid parts of the world. It is also found that the climate scenarios and initialization contribute significantly to the overall uncertainty, compared to contributions for more nonextreme precipitation simulations. This finding has implications in how design precipitation extremes ought to be projected into the future, with greater attention being paid on a broader selection of emission scenarios and initializations than is the case with projections of nonextreme precipitations.
AB - Projections of extreme precipitation are of considerable interest in a range of design and management applications. These projections, however, can exhibit uncertainty that requires quantification to provide confidence to any application they are used in. This study assesses the uncertainty in projected extreme daily precipitation, separated into model, scenario, and ensemble components using the square root error variance (SREV) rationale. For this, 45 projections of daily precipitation from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) are used, consisting of multiple global circulation models and their ensemble members, for a range of Representative Concentration Pathways, allowing assessment across land-covered areas worldwide. It is found that the uncertainty in dry regions is significantly higher compared to wet regions, raising concerns regarding infrastructure design for the future in arid parts of the world. It is also found that the climate scenarios and initialization contribute significantly to the overall uncertainty, compared to contributions for more nonextreme precipitation simulations. This finding has implications in how design precipitation extremes ought to be projected into the future, with greater attention being paid on a broader selection of emission scenarios and initializations than is the case with projections of nonextreme precipitations.
KW - daily precipitation projections
KW - extreme precipitation uncertainty
KW - global circulation models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089853821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2019EA001052
DO - 10.1029/2019EA001052
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089853821
SN - 2333-5084
VL - 7
JO - Earth and Space Science
JF - Earth and Space Science
IS - 8
M1 - e2019EA001052
ER -