Quantitative approaches for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and its performance assessment in terms of solvent types and the related matrix effects

Ahsan Ullah, Ki Hyun Kim, Jan E. Szulejko, DalWoong Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

For the quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC), the use of a proper solvent is crucial to reduce the chance of biased results or effect of interference either in direct analysis by a gas chromatograph (GC) or with thermal desorption analysis due to matrix effects, e.g., the existence of a broad solvent peak tailing that overlaps early eluters. In this work, the relative performance of different solvents has been evaluated using standards containing 19 VOCs in three different solvents (methanol, pentane, and hexane). Comparison of the response factor of the detected VOCs confirms their means for methanol and hexane higher than that of pentane by 84% and 27%, respectively. In light of the solvent vapor pressure at the initial GC column temperature (35°C), the enhanced sensitivity in methanol suggests the potential role of solvent vapor expansion in the hot injector (split ON) which leads to solvent trapping on the column. In contrast, if the recurrent relationships between homologues were evaluated using an effective carbon number (ECN) additivity approach, the comparability assessed in terms of percent difference improved on the order of methanol (26.5%), hexane (6.73%), and pentane (5.24%). As such, the relative performance of GC can be affected considerably in the direct injection-based analysis of VOC due to the selection of solvent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalAsian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

performance assessment
volatile organic compound
matrix
methanol
gas
effect
vapor pressure
tailings
quantitative analysis
trapping
desorption
carbon

Keywords

  • Effective carbon number (ECN)
  • Response factor
  • Sandwich injection (SI) technique
  • Solvent effect
  • Volatile organic compound (VOC)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{d3e5c6ec41f644c98245328bbc6bf882,
title = "Quantitative approaches for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and its performance assessment in terms of solvent types and the related matrix effects",
abstract = "For the quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC), the use of a proper solvent is crucial to reduce the chance of biased results or effect of interference either in direct analysis by a gas chromatograph (GC) or with thermal desorption analysis due to matrix effects, e.g., the existence of a broad solvent peak tailing that overlaps early eluters. In this work, the relative performance of different solvents has been evaluated using standards containing 19 VOCs in three different solvents (methanol, pentane, and hexane). Comparison of the response factor of the detected VOCs confirms their means for methanol and hexane higher than that of pentane by 84{\%} and 27{\%}, respectively. In light of the solvent vapor pressure at the initial GC column temperature (35°C), the enhanced sensitivity in methanol suggests the potential role of solvent vapor expansion in the hot injector (split ON) which leads to solvent trapping on the column. In contrast, if the recurrent relationships between homologues were evaluated using an effective carbon number (ECN) additivity approach, the comparability assessed in terms of percent difference improved on the order of methanol (26.5{\%}), hexane (6.73{\%}), and pentane (5.24{\%}). As such, the relative performance of GC can be affected considerably in the direct injection-based analysis of VOC due to the selection of solvent.",
keywords = "Effective carbon number (ECN), Response factor, Sandwich injection (SI) technique, Solvent effect, Volatile organic compound (VOC)",
author = "Ahsan Ullah and Kim, {Ki Hyun} and Szulejko, {Jan E.} and DalWoong Choi",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.5572/ajae.2017.11.1.001",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1976-6912",
publisher = "Japan Society of Atmospheric Environment",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative approaches for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and its performance assessment in terms of solvent types and the related matrix effects

AU - Ullah, Ahsan

AU - Kim, Ki Hyun

AU - Szulejko, Jan E.

AU - Choi, DalWoong

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - For the quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC), the use of a proper solvent is crucial to reduce the chance of biased results or effect of interference either in direct analysis by a gas chromatograph (GC) or with thermal desorption analysis due to matrix effects, e.g., the existence of a broad solvent peak tailing that overlaps early eluters. In this work, the relative performance of different solvents has been evaluated using standards containing 19 VOCs in three different solvents (methanol, pentane, and hexane). Comparison of the response factor of the detected VOCs confirms their means for methanol and hexane higher than that of pentane by 84% and 27%, respectively. In light of the solvent vapor pressure at the initial GC column temperature (35°C), the enhanced sensitivity in methanol suggests the potential role of solvent vapor expansion in the hot injector (split ON) which leads to solvent trapping on the column. In contrast, if the recurrent relationships between homologues were evaluated using an effective carbon number (ECN) additivity approach, the comparability assessed in terms of percent difference improved on the order of methanol (26.5%), hexane (6.73%), and pentane (5.24%). As such, the relative performance of GC can be affected considerably in the direct injection-based analysis of VOC due to the selection of solvent.

AB - For the quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC), the use of a proper solvent is crucial to reduce the chance of biased results or effect of interference either in direct analysis by a gas chromatograph (GC) or with thermal desorption analysis due to matrix effects, e.g., the existence of a broad solvent peak tailing that overlaps early eluters. In this work, the relative performance of different solvents has been evaluated using standards containing 19 VOCs in three different solvents (methanol, pentane, and hexane). Comparison of the response factor of the detected VOCs confirms their means for methanol and hexane higher than that of pentane by 84% and 27%, respectively. In light of the solvent vapor pressure at the initial GC column temperature (35°C), the enhanced sensitivity in methanol suggests the potential role of solvent vapor expansion in the hot injector (split ON) which leads to solvent trapping on the column. In contrast, if the recurrent relationships between homologues were evaluated using an effective carbon number (ECN) additivity approach, the comparability assessed in terms of percent difference improved on the order of methanol (26.5%), hexane (6.73%), and pentane (5.24%). As such, the relative performance of GC can be affected considerably in the direct injection-based analysis of VOC due to the selection of solvent.

KW - Effective carbon number (ECN)

KW - Response factor

KW - Sandwich injection (SI) technique

KW - Solvent effect

KW - Volatile organic compound (VOC)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017135064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017135064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5572/ajae.2017.11.1.001

DO - 10.5572/ajae.2017.11.1.001

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment

JF - Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1976-6912

IS - 1

ER -