Quasi-Experiment Study on Effectiveness Evaluation of Health Communication Strategies

Dae Jong Song, Jae Wook Choi, Kyunghee Kim, Min Soo Kim, Jiwon Monica Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This experimental study examined differences in doctor-patient relationships according to the health communication strategies during cases of medical malpractices occurred at primary medical institution. A total of 116 subjects aged in their 20s-50s was sampled. The first medical malpractice scenario chosen was the medical malpractice case most frequently registered at the Korean Medical Association Mutual Aid and the second scenario was associated with materials and devices as the cause of malpractice. Four types of crisis communication strategy messages were utilized, consisting of denial, denial + ingratiation, apology, and apology + ingratiation. Subjects were classified into four research groups by crisis communication strategy to measure levels of trust, control mutuality, commitment, and satisfaction, before and after the occurrence of medical malpractice and application of communication strategies. The findings of this study revealed that the apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, showed a smaller difference before and after the application of communication strategies in all variables of trust (F = 8.080, F = 5.768), control mutuality (F = 8.824, F = 9.081), commitment (F = 9.815, F = 8.301), and satisfaction (F = 8.723, F = 5.638). Further, a significant interaction effect was shown between variables. The apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, was effective in the improvement of doctor-patient relationships in both Scenarios I and II. For Scenario I, the apology strategy without ingratiation boosted commitment and satisfaction, but for Scenario II, utilizing the apology strategy with ingratiation boosted the effectiveness of trust and commitment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1027-1036
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Korean Medical Science
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Health Communication
Malpractice
Communication
Equipment and Supplies
Denial (Psychology)
Research

Keywords

  • Crisis Communication
  • Health Communication Strategies
  • Medical Malpractice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Quasi-Experiment Study on Effectiveness Evaluation of Health Communication Strategies. / Song, Dae Jong; Choi, Jae Wook; Kim, Kyunghee; Kim, Min Soo; Moon, Jiwon Monica.

In: Journal of Korean Medical Science, Vol. 31, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 1027-1036.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Song, Dae Jong ; Choi, Jae Wook ; Kim, Kyunghee ; Kim, Min Soo ; Moon, Jiwon Monica. / Quasi-Experiment Study on Effectiveness Evaluation of Health Communication Strategies. In: Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 1027-1036.
@article{2c7113aaef804af1b4cb1089aee08192,
title = "Quasi-Experiment Study on Effectiveness Evaluation of Health Communication Strategies",
abstract = "This experimental study examined differences in doctor-patient relationships according to the health communication strategies during cases of medical malpractices occurred at primary medical institution. A total of 116 subjects aged in their 20s-50s was sampled. The first medical malpractice scenario chosen was the medical malpractice case most frequently registered at the Korean Medical Association Mutual Aid and the second scenario was associated with materials and devices as the cause of malpractice. Four types of crisis communication strategy messages were utilized, consisting of denial, denial + ingratiation, apology, and apology + ingratiation. Subjects were classified into four research groups by crisis communication strategy to measure levels of trust, control mutuality, commitment, and satisfaction, before and after the occurrence of medical malpractice and application of communication strategies. The findings of this study revealed that the apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, showed a smaller difference before and after the application of communication strategies in all variables of trust (F = 8.080, F = 5.768), control mutuality (F = 8.824, F = 9.081), commitment (F = 9.815, F = 8.301), and satisfaction (F = 8.723, F = 5.638). Further, a significant interaction effect was shown between variables. The apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, was effective in the improvement of doctor-patient relationships in both Scenarios I and II. For Scenario I, the apology strategy without ingratiation boosted commitment and satisfaction, but for Scenario II, utilizing the apology strategy with ingratiation boosted the effectiveness of trust and commitment.",
keywords = "Crisis Communication, Health Communication Strategies, Medical Malpractice",
author = "Song, {Dae Jong} and Choi, {Jae Wook} and Kyunghee Kim and Kim, {Min Soo} and Moon, {Jiwon Monica}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1027",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1027--1036",
journal = "Journal of Korean Medical Science",
issn = "1011-8934",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Medical Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quasi-Experiment Study on Effectiveness Evaluation of Health Communication Strategies

AU - Song, Dae Jong

AU - Choi, Jae Wook

AU - Kim, Kyunghee

AU - Kim, Min Soo

AU - Moon, Jiwon Monica

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - This experimental study examined differences in doctor-patient relationships according to the health communication strategies during cases of medical malpractices occurred at primary medical institution. A total of 116 subjects aged in their 20s-50s was sampled. The first medical malpractice scenario chosen was the medical malpractice case most frequently registered at the Korean Medical Association Mutual Aid and the second scenario was associated with materials and devices as the cause of malpractice. Four types of crisis communication strategy messages were utilized, consisting of denial, denial + ingratiation, apology, and apology + ingratiation. Subjects were classified into four research groups by crisis communication strategy to measure levels of trust, control mutuality, commitment, and satisfaction, before and after the occurrence of medical malpractice and application of communication strategies. The findings of this study revealed that the apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, showed a smaller difference before and after the application of communication strategies in all variables of trust (F = 8.080, F = 5.768), control mutuality (F = 8.824, F = 9.081), commitment (F = 9.815, F = 8.301), and satisfaction (F = 8.723, F = 5.638). Further, a significant interaction effect was shown between variables. The apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, was effective in the improvement of doctor-patient relationships in both Scenarios I and II. For Scenario I, the apology strategy without ingratiation boosted commitment and satisfaction, but for Scenario II, utilizing the apology strategy with ingratiation boosted the effectiveness of trust and commitment.

AB - This experimental study examined differences in doctor-patient relationships according to the health communication strategies during cases of medical malpractices occurred at primary medical institution. A total of 116 subjects aged in their 20s-50s was sampled. The first medical malpractice scenario chosen was the medical malpractice case most frequently registered at the Korean Medical Association Mutual Aid and the second scenario was associated with materials and devices as the cause of malpractice. Four types of crisis communication strategy messages were utilized, consisting of denial, denial + ingratiation, apology, and apology + ingratiation. Subjects were classified into four research groups by crisis communication strategy to measure levels of trust, control mutuality, commitment, and satisfaction, before and after the occurrence of medical malpractice and application of communication strategies. The findings of this study revealed that the apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, showed a smaller difference before and after the application of communication strategies in all variables of trust (F = 8.080, F = 5.768), control mutuality (F = 8.824, F = 9.081), commitment (F = 9.815, F = 8.301), and satisfaction (F = 8.723, F = 5.638). Further, a significant interaction effect was shown between variables. The apology strategy, compared with the denial strategy, was effective in the improvement of doctor-patient relationships in both Scenarios I and II. For Scenario I, the apology strategy without ingratiation boosted commitment and satisfaction, but for Scenario II, utilizing the apology strategy with ingratiation boosted the effectiveness of trust and commitment.

KW - Crisis Communication

KW - Health Communication Strategies

KW - Medical Malpractice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013704769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013704769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1027

DO - 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1027

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1027

EP - 1036

JO - Journal of Korean Medical Science

JF - Journal of Korean Medical Science

SN - 1011-8934

IS - 7

ER -