Redox cycling of CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming/water splitting

Kyoung Soo Kang, Chang Hee Kim, Ki Kwang Bae, Won Chul Cho, Woo Jin Kim, Young Ho Kim, Sung Hyun Kim, Chu Sik Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming was evaluated to determine if it could enhance the reactivity, CO selectivity and thermal stability of CuFe2O4. Two-step methane reforming consists of a syngas production step and a water splitting step. CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 was prepared using an aerial oxidation method. Non-isothermal methane reduction was carried out on TGA to compare the reactivity of CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2. In addition, a syngas production step was performed at 900 °C and water splitting was conducted at 800 °C alternatively five times to compare the methane conversion, CO selectivity, cycle ability and hydrogen production by water splitting in a fixed bed reactor. If the 1st syngas production step results are excluded due to over-oxidation, CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2 showed approximately 74.0-82.8% and 60.3-87.5% methane conversion, respectively, and 44.0-47.8% and 65.2-81.5% CO selectivity, respectively. Using CeO2 and ZrO2 as supports effectively improved the reactivity and methane conversion compared to CuFe2O4. CuFe2O4/ZrO2 showed high methane conversion due to the high phase stability and thermal stability of ZrO2 but the selectivity was not improved. After 5 successive cycles, the CeFeO3 phase was found on CuFe2O4/CeO2. Furthermore, methane conversion, CO selectivity and the amounts of hydrogen production of CuFe2O4/CeO2 increased with increasing number of cycles. Additional test up to the 11th cycle on CuFe2O4/CeO2 revealed that CeO2 is a better support that ZnO2 in terms of the reactivity and CO selectivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)568-576
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

water splitting
Reforming reactions
Methane
methane
cycles
selectivity
synthesis gas
Water
reactivity
Catalyst selectivity
hydrogen production
Hydrogen production
Thermodynamic stability
thermal stability
Oxidation
oxidation
Phase stability
Oxidation-Reduction
beds
reactors

Keywords

  • CO selectivity
  • CuFeO
  • Solar
  • Two-step methane reforming
  • Water splitting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Redox cycling of CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming/water splitting. / Kang, Kyoung Soo; Kim, Chang Hee; Bae, Ki Kwang; Cho, Won Chul; Kim, Woo Jin; Kim, Young Ho; Kim, Sung Hyun; Park, Chu Sik.

In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.01.2010, p. 568-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kang, Kyoung Soo ; Kim, Chang Hee ; Bae, Ki Kwang ; Cho, Won Chul ; Kim, Woo Jin ; Kim, Young Ho ; Kim, Sung Hyun ; Park, Chu Sik. / Redox cycling of CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming/water splitting. In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 568-576.
@article{ef8fa11b5c134649a2ab1d6fd6a1451a,
title = "Redox cycling of CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming/water splitting",
abstract = "CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming was evaluated to determine if it could enhance the reactivity, CO selectivity and thermal stability of CuFe2O4. Two-step methane reforming consists of a syngas production step and a water splitting step. CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 was prepared using an aerial oxidation method. Non-isothermal methane reduction was carried out on TGA to compare the reactivity of CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2. In addition, a syngas production step was performed at 900 °C and water splitting was conducted at 800 °C alternatively five times to compare the methane conversion, CO selectivity, cycle ability and hydrogen production by water splitting in a fixed bed reactor. If the 1st syngas production step results are excluded due to over-oxidation, CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2 showed approximately 74.0-82.8{\%} and 60.3-87.5{\%} methane conversion, respectively, and 44.0-47.8{\%} and 65.2-81.5{\%} CO selectivity, respectively. Using CeO2 and ZrO2 as supports effectively improved the reactivity and methane conversion compared to CuFe2O4. CuFe2O4/ZrO2 showed high methane conversion due to the high phase stability and thermal stability of ZrO2 but the selectivity was not improved. After 5 successive cycles, the CeFeO3 phase was found on CuFe2O4/CeO2. Furthermore, methane conversion, CO selectivity and the amounts of hydrogen production of CuFe2O4/CeO2 increased with increasing number of cycles. Additional test up to the 11th cycle on CuFe2O4/CeO2 revealed that CeO2 is a better support that ZnO2 in terms of the reactivity and CO selectivity.",
keywords = "CO selectivity, CuFeO, Solar, Two-step methane reforming, Water splitting",
author = "Kang, {Kyoung Soo} and Kim, {Chang Hee} and Bae, {Ki Kwang} and Cho, {Won Chul} and Kim, {Woo Jin} and Kim, {Young Ho} and Kim, {Sung Hyun} and Park, {Chu Sik}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.099",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "568--576",
journal = "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy",
issn = "0360-3199",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redox cycling of CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming/water splitting

AU - Kang, Kyoung Soo

AU - Kim, Chang Hee

AU - Bae, Ki Kwang

AU - Cho, Won Chul

AU - Kim, Woo Jin

AU - Kim, Young Ho

AU - Kim, Sung Hyun

AU - Park, Chu Sik

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming was evaluated to determine if it could enhance the reactivity, CO selectivity and thermal stability of CuFe2O4. Two-step methane reforming consists of a syngas production step and a water splitting step. CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 was prepared using an aerial oxidation method. Non-isothermal methane reduction was carried out on TGA to compare the reactivity of CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2. In addition, a syngas production step was performed at 900 °C and water splitting was conducted at 800 °C alternatively five times to compare the methane conversion, CO selectivity, cycle ability and hydrogen production by water splitting in a fixed bed reactor. If the 1st syngas production step results are excluded due to over-oxidation, CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2 showed approximately 74.0-82.8% and 60.3-87.5% methane conversion, respectively, and 44.0-47.8% and 65.2-81.5% CO selectivity, respectively. Using CeO2 and ZrO2 as supports effectively improved the reactivity and methane conversion compared to CuFe2O4. CuFe2O4/ZrO2 showed high methane conversion due to the high phase stability and thermal stability of ZrO2 but the selectivity was not improved. After 5 successive cycles, the CeFeO3 phase was found on CuFe2O4/CeO2. Furthermore, methane conversion, CO selectivity and the amounts of hydrogen production of CuFe2O4/CeO2 increased with increasing number of cycles. Additional test up to the 11th cycle on CuFe2O4/CeO2 revealed that CeO2 is a better support that ZnO2 in terms of the reactivity and CO selectivity.

AB - CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming was evaluated to determine if it could enhance the reactivity, CO selectivity and thermal stability of CuFe2O4. Two-step methane reforming consists of a syngas production step and a water splitting step. CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 was prepared using an aerial oxidation method. Non-isothermal methane reduction was carried out on TGA to compare the reactivity of CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2. In addition, a syngas production step was performed at 900 °C and water splitting was conducted at 800 °C alternatively five times to compare the methane conversion, CO selectivity, cycle ability and hydrogen production by water splitting in a fixed bed reactor. If the 1st syngas production step results are excluded due to over-oxidation, CuFe2O4/ZrO2 and CuFe2O4/CeO2 showed approximately 74.0-82.8% and 60.3-87.5% methane conversion, respectively, and 44.0-47.8% and 65.2-81.5% CO selectivity, respectively. Using CeO2 and ZrO2 as supports effectively improved the reactivity and methane conversion compared to CuFe2O4. CuFe2O4/ZrO2 showed high methane conversion due to the high phase stability and thermal stability of ZrO2 but the selectivity was not improved. After 5 successive cycles, the CeFeO3 phase was found on CuFe2O4/CeO2. Furthermore, methane conversion, CO selectivity and the amounts of hydrogen production of CuFe2O4/CeO2 increased with increasing number of cycles. Additional test up to the 11th cycle on CuFe2O4/CeO2 revealed that CeO2 is a better support that ZnO2 in terms of the reactivity and CO selectivity.

KW - CO selectivity

KW - CuFeO

KW - Solar

KW - Two-step methane reforming

KW - Water splitting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73749083640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73749083640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.099

DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.099

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:73749083640

VL - 35

SP - 568

EP - 576

JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

SN - 0360-3199

IS - 2

ER -