## Abstract

Regularization methods allow one to handle a variety of inferential problems where there are more covariates than cases. This allows one to consider a potentially enormous number of covariates for a problem. We exploit the power of these techniques, supersaturating models by augmenting the "natural" covariates in the problem with an additional indicator for each case in the data set. We attach a penalty term for these case-specific indicators which is designed to produce a desired effect. For regression methods with squared error loss, an ℓ_{1} penalty produces a regression which is robust to outliers and high leverage cases; for quantile regression methods, an ℓ2 penalty decreases the variance of the fit enough to overcome an increase in bias. The paradigm thus allows us to robustify procedures which lack robustness and to increase the efficiency of procedures which are robust. We provide a general framework for the inclusion of case-specific parameters in regularization problems, describing the impact on the effective loss for a variety of regression and classification problems. We outline a computational strategy by which existing software can be modified to solve the augmented regularization problem, providing conditions under which such modification will converge to the optimum solution. We illustrate the benefits of including case-specific parameters in the context of mean regression and quantile regression through analysis of NHANES and linguistic data sets.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 350-372 |

Number of pages | 23 |

Journal | Statistical Science |

Volume | 27 |

Issue number | 3 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 2012 |

Externally published | Yes |

## Keywords

- Case indicator
- Large margin classifier
- Lasso
- Leverage point
- Outlier
- Penalized method
- Quantile regression

## ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Statistics and Probability
- Mathematics(all)
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty