Rehabilitation with osteopathic manipulative treatment after lumbar disc surgery

A randomised, controlled pilot study

Byungh Ho J. Kim, Jung Hoon Ahn, Hee Cheol Cho, Dong Yun Kim, Tae Yeong Kim, Bum-Chul Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite growing evidence regarding the role of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the management of low back pain, there is little evidence to support the use of OMT as a post-operative rehabilitation to improve the functional outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Objective: To assess the feasibility for a future definitive randomised control trial that would indicate whether OMT improves post-operative outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy compared to a standard exercise programme. Design: Randomised controlled pilot study. Setting: Department of Spinal Surgery and Department of Spinal Rehabilitation at a major metropolitan spine surgery hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Methods: Patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy due to low back pain with referred leg pain resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled in the study. Thirty-three patients aged 25-65 years were randomly assigned using a random number table to the OMT (n = 16) group or exercise group (n = 17). Patients received the allocated intervention twice a week for 4 weeks. Each session was 30 min. Primary outcomes were post-surgical functional disability and intensity of low back and leg pain. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline (2-3 weeks after surgery) and post-intervention (7-8 weeks after surgery). Double blinding was not feasible in the study setting. Results: Thirty-three participants were analysed. Both rehabilitation interventions improved all primary and secondary outcomes. Post-surgical physical disability improved more with OMT rehabilitation than the exercise programme (54% vs. 26%, P < 0.05). Residual leg pain decreased with OMT (53%) and exercise (17%). Post-operative low back pain decreased by 37% in the OMT group and 10% in the exercise group. Patients in both groups required less frequent use of medication and were highly satisfied with the rehabilitation interventions. No side effects or complications from any intervention were reported. Conclusion: The current pilot study shows the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial investigating whether rehabilitation with OMT is a viable approach for post-operative management of a lumbar microdiscectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-188
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Osteopathic Manipulation
Rehabilitation
Low Back Pain
Exercise
Leg
Referred Pain
Exercise Therapy
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Republic of Korea
Spine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Lumbar open laser microdiscectomy
  • Osteopathic manipulative treatment
  • Post-operative disability
  • Rehabilitation
  • Residual pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Rehabilitation with osteopathic manipulative treatment after lumbar disc surgery : A randomised, controlled pilot study. / Kim, Byungh Ho J.; Ahn, Jung Hoon; Cho, Hee Cheol; Kim, Dong Yun; Kim, Tae Yeong; Yoon, Bum-Chul.

In: International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 181-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Byungh Ho J. ; Ahn, Jung Hoon ; Cho, Hee Cheol ; Kim, Dong Yun ; Kim, Tae Yeong ; Yoon, Bum-Chul. / Rehabilitation with osteopathic manipulative treatment after lumbar disc surgery : A randomised, controlled pilot study. In: International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 181-188.
@article{b5935da3ded94d75acaa1518fcd07671,
title = "Rehabilitation with osteopathic manipulative treatment after lumbar disc surgery: A randomised, controlled pilot study",
abstract = "Background: Despite growing evidence regarding the role of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the management of low back pain, there is little evidence to support the use of OMT as a post-operative rehabilitation to improve the functional outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Objective: To assess the feasibility for a future definitive randomised control trial that would indicate whether OMT improves post-operative outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy compared to a standard exercise programme. Design: Randomised controlled pilot study. Setting: Department of Spinal Surgery and Department of Spinal Rehabilitation at a major metropolitan spine surgery hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Methods: Patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy due to low back pain with referred leg pain resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled in the study. Thirty-three patients aged 25-65 years were randomly assigned using a random number table to the OMT (n = 16) group or exercise group (n = 17). Patients received the allocated intervention twice a week for 4 weeks. Each session was 30 min. Primary outcomes were post-surgical functional disability and intensity of low back and leg pain. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline (2-3 weeks after surgery) and post-intervention (7-8 weeks after surgery). Double blinding was not feasible in the study setting. Results: Thirty-three participants were analysed. Both rehabilitation interventions improved all primary and secondary outcomes. Post-surgical physical disability improved more with OMT rehabilitation than the exercise programme (54{\%} vs. 26{\%}, P < 0.05). Residual leg pain decreased with OMT (53{\%}) and exercise (17{\%}). Post-operative low back pain decreased by 37{\%} in the OMT group and 10{\%} in the exercise group. Patients in both groups required less frequent use of medication and were highly satisfied with the rehabilitation interventions. No side effects or complications from any intervention were reported. Conclusion: The current pilot study shows the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial investigating whether rehabilitation with OMT is a viable approach for post-operative management of a lumbar microdiscectomy.",
keywords = "Exercise, Lumbar open laser microdiscectomy, Osteopathic manipulative treatment, Post-operative disability, Rehabilitation, Residual pain",
author = "Kim, {Byungh Ho J.} and Ahn, {Jung Hoon} and Cho, {Hee Cheol} and Kim, {Dong Yun} and Kim, {Tae Yeong} and Bum-Chul Yoon",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "181--188",
journal = "International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine",
issn = "1746-0689",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation with osteopathic manipulative treatment after lumbar disc surgery

T2 - A randomised, controlled pilot study

AU - Kim, Byungh Ho J.

AU - Ahn, Jung Hoon

AU - Cho, Hee Cheol

AU - Kim, Dong Yun

AU - Kim, Tae Yeong

AU - Yoon, Bum-Chul

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background: Despite growing evidence regarding the role of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the management of low back pain, there is little evidence to support the use of OMT as a post-operative rehabilitation to improve the functional outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Objective: To assess the feasibility for a future definitive randomised control trial that would indicate whether OMT improves post-operative outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy compared to a standard exercise programme. Design: Randomised controlled pilot study. Setting: Department of Spinal Surgery and Department of Spinal Rehabilitation at a major metropolitan spine surgery hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Methods: Patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy due to low back pain with referred leg pain resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled in the study. Thirty-three patients aged 25-65 years were randomly assigned using a random number table to the OMT (n = 16) group or exercise group (n = 17). Patients received the allocated intervention twice a week for 4 weeks. Each session was 30 min. Primary outcomes were post-surgical functional disability and intensity of low back and leg pain. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline (2-3 weeks after surgery) and post-intervention (7-8 weeks after surgery). Double blinding was not feasible in the study setting. Results: Thirty-three participants were analysed. Both rehabilitation interventions improved all primary and secondary outcomes. Post-surgical physical disability improved more with OMT rehabilitation than the exercise programme (54% vs. 26%, P < 0.05). Residual leg pain decreased with OMT (53%) and exercise (17%). Post-operative low back pain decreased by 37% in the OMT group and 10% in the exercise group. Patients in both groups required less frequent use of medication and were highly satisfied with the rehabilitation interventions. No side effects or complications from any intervention were reported. Conclusion: The current pilot study shows the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial investigating whether rehabilitation with OMT is a viable approach for post-operative management of a lumbar microdiscectomy.

AB - Background: Despite growing evidence regarding the role of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the management of low back pain, there is little evidence to support the use of OMT as a post-operative rehabilitation to improve the functional outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Objective: To assess the feasibility for a future definitive randomised control trial that would indicate whether OMT improves post-operative outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy compared to a standard exercise programme. Design: Randomised controlled pilot study. Setting: Department of Spinal Surgery and Department of Spinal Rehabilitation at a major metropolitan spine surgery hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Methods: Patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy due to low back pain with referred leg pain resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled in the study. Thirty-three patients aged 25-65 years were randomly assigned using a random number table to the OMT (n = 16) group or exercise group (n = 17). Patients received the allocated intervention twice a week for 4 weeks. Each session was 30 min. Primary outcomes were post-surgical functional disability and intensity of low back and leg pain. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline (2-3 weeks after surgery) and post-intervention (7-8 weeks after surgery). Double blinding was not feasible in the study setting. Results: Thirty-three participants were analysed. Both rehabilitation interventions improved all primary and secondary outcomes. Post-surgical physical disability improved more with OMT rehabilitation than the exercise programme (54% vs. 26%, P < 0.05). Residual leg pain decreased with OMT (53%) and exercise (17%). Post-operative low back pain decreased by 37% in the OMT group and 10% in the exercise group. Patients in both groups required less frequent use of medication and were highly satisfied with the rehabilitation interventions. No side effects or complications from any intervention were reported. Conclusion: The current pilot study shows the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial investigating whether rehabilitation with OMT is a viable approach for post-operative management of a lumbar microdiscectomy.

KW - Exercise

KW - Lumbar open laser microdiscectomy

KW - Osteopathic manipulative treatment

KW - Post-operative disability

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Residual pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941274143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941274143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 181

EP - 188

JO - International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

JF - International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

SN - 1746-0689

IS - 3

ER -