Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis

Sarah Qadeer, Robert Kerstein, Ryan Jin Yung Kim, Jung Bo Huh, Sang-Wan Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Articulation paper mark size is widely accepted as an indicator of forceful tooth contacts. However, mark size is indicative of contact location and surface area only, and does not quantify occlusal force. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between the size of paper marks and the percentage of force applied to the same tooth. Materials and methods: Thirty dentate female subjects intercuspated into articulation paper strips to mark occlusal contacts on their maxillary posterior teeth, followed by taking photographs. Then each subject made a multi-bite digital occlusal force percentage recording. The surface area of the largest and darkest articulation paper mark (n = 240 marks) in each quadrant (n = 60 quadrants) was calculated in photographic pixels, and compared with the force percentage present on the same tooth. Results: Regression analysis shows a bi-variant fit of force % on tooth (P<.05). The correlation coefficient between the mark area and the percentage of force indicated a low positive correlation. The coefficient of determination showed a low causative relationship between mark area and force (r2 = 0.067). The largest paper mark in each quadrant was matched with the most forceful tooth in that same quadrant only 38.3% of time. Only 6 2/3% of mark surface area could be explained by applied occlusal force, while most of the mark area results from other factors unrelated to the applied occlusal force. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that size of articulation paper mark is an unreliable indicator of applied occlusal force, to guide treatment occlusal adjustments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-12
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Bite Force
Tooth
Occlusal Adjustment
Bites and Stings
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Articulation paper
  • Computerized occlusal analysis system
  • Force percentage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. / Qadeer, Sarah; Kerstein, Robert; Kim, Ryan Jin Yung; Huh, Jung Bo; Shin, Sang-Wan.

In: Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.12.2012, p. 7-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aab61812217c40e78dfd45ab259520d4,
title = "Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: Articulation paper mark size is widely accepted as an indicator of forceful tooth contacts. However, mark size is indicative of contact location and surface area only, and does not quantify occlusal force. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between the size of paper marks and the percentage of force applied to the same tooth. Materials and methods: Thirty dentate female subjects intercuspated into articulation paper strips to mark occlusal contacts on their maxillary posterior teeth, followed by taking photographs. Then each subject made a multi-bite digital occlusal force percentage recording. The surface area of the largest and darkest articulation paper mark (n = 240 marks) in each quadrant (n = 60 quadrants) was calculated in photographic pixels, and compared with the force percentage present on the same tooth. Results: Regression analysis shows a bi-variant fit of force {\%} on tooth (P<.05). The correlation coefficient between the mark area and the percentage of force indicated a low positive correlation. The coefficient of determination showed a low causative relationship between mark area and force (r2 = 0.067). The largest paper mark in each quadrant was matched with the most forceful tooth in that same quadrant only 38.3{\%} of time. Only 6 2/3{\%} of mark surface area could be explained by applied occlusal force, while most of the mark area results from other factors unrelated to the applied occlusal force. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that size of articulation paper mark is an unreliable indicator of applied occlusal force, to guide treatment occlusal adjustments.",
keywords = "Articulation paper, Computerized occlusal analysis system, Force percentage",
author = "Sarah Qadeer and Robert Kerstein and Kim, {Ryan Jin Yung} and Huh, {Jung Bo} and Sang-Wan Shin",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "7--12",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics",
issn = "2005-7806",
publisher = "The Korean Academy of prosthodontics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis

AU - Qadeer, Sarah

AU - Kerstein, Robert

AU - Kim, Ryan Jin Yung

AU - Huh, Jung Bo

AU - Shin, Sang-Wan

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Purpose: Articulation paper mark size is widely accepted as an indicator of forceful tooth contacts. However, mark size is indicative of contact location and surface area only, and does not quantify occlusal force. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between the size of paper marks and the percentage of force applied to the same tooth. Materials and methods: Thirty dentate female subjects intercuspated into articulation paper strips to mark occlusal contacts on their maxillary posterior teeth, followed by taking photographs. Then each subject made a multi-bite digital occlusal force percentage recording. The surface area of the largest and darkest articulation paper mark (n = 240 marks) in each quadrant (n = 60 quadrants) was calculated in photographic pixels, and compared with the force percentage present on the same tooth. Results: Regression analysis shows a bi-variant fit of force % on tooth (P<.05). The correlation coefficient between the mark area and the percentage of force indicated a low positive correlation. The coefficient of determination showed a low causative relationship between mark area and force (r2 = 0.067). The largest paper mark in each quadrant was matched with the most forceful tooth in that same quadrant only 38.3% of time. Only 6 2/3% of mark surface area could be explained by applied occlusal force, while most of the mark area results from other factors unrelated to the applied occlusal force. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that size of articulation paper mark is an unreliable indicator of applied occlusal force, to guide treatment occlusal adjustments.

AB - Purpose: Articulation paper mark size is widely accepted as an indicator of forceful tooth contacts. However, mark size is indicative of contact location and surface area only, and does not quantify occlusal force. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between the size of paper marks and the percentage of force applied to the same tooth. Materials and methods: Thirty dentate female subjects intercuspated into articulation paper strips to mark occlusal contacts on their maxillary posterior teeth, followed by taking photographs. Then each subject made a multi-bite digital occlusal force percentage recording. The surface area of the largest and darkest articulation paper mark (n = 240 marks) in each quadrant (n = 60 quadrants) was calculated in photographic pixels, and compared with the force percentage present on the same tooth. Results: Regression analysis shows a bi-variant fit of force % on tooth (P<.05). The correlation coefficient between the mark area and the percentage of force indicated a low positive correlation. The coefficient of determination showed a low causative relationship between mark area and force (r2 = 0.067). The largest paper mark in each quadrant was matched with the most forceful tooth in that same quadrant only 38.3% of time. Only 6 2/3% of mark surface area could be explained by applied occlusal force, while most of the mark area results from other factors unrelated to the applied occlusal force. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that size of articulation paper mark is an unreliable indicator of applied occlusal force, to guide treatment occlusal adjustments.

KW - Articulation paper

KW - Computerized occlusal analysis system

KW - Force percentage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876910686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876910686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7

DO - 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876910686

VL - 4

SP - 7

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

SN - 2005-7806

IS - 1

ER -