Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: Comparison of the 4 available methods

Jae-Young Hong, Seung-Woo Suh, Jae Hyuk Yang, Si Young Park, Ji Hoon Han

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Observational study with 3 examiners. OBJECTIVE.: To compare the reliability of shoulder balance measurement methods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: There are several measurement methods for shoulder balance. No reliability analysis has been performed despite the clinical importance of this measurement. METHODS.: Whole spine posteroanterior radiographs (n = 270) were collected to compare the reliability of the 4 shoulder balance measures in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Each radiograph was measured twice by each of the 3 examiners using 4 measurement methods. The data were analyzed statistically to determine the inter-and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS.: Overall, the 4 radiographical methods showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient regardless of severity in intraobserver comparisons (>0.904). In addition, the mean absolute difference values in all methods were low and were comparatively similar (<1.73). However, in interobserver comparisons, reliabilities were significantly decreased in the less severe radiographs, firstly on radiographical shoulder height measures (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.445, mean absolute difference <3.91). However, the intraclass correlation coefficients in the coracoid height difference and clavicular angle methods were in the excellent range (>0.810 and >0.787, respectively) regardless of severity. In addition, the mean absolute difference values in the clavicular angle method were lower (<0.62) than others. CONCLUSION.: The higher reliability of the clavicular angle and coracoid height difference methods indicate the clinical usefulness of these methods. Physicians should selectively use the shoulder balance measurement method clinically.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSpine
Volume38
Issue number26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec 15

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Observational Studies
Spine
Physicians

Keywords

  • adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • reliability analysis
  • shoulder balance measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures : Comparison of the 4 available methods. / Hong, Jae-Young; Suh, Seung-Woo; Yang, Jae Hyuk; Park, Si Young; Han, Ji Hoon.

In: Spine, Vol. 38, No. 26, 15.12.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{53ce417d312640f58e4cbb0f2283aea0,
title = "Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: Comparison of the 4 available methods",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN.: Observational study with 3 examiners. OBJECTIVE.: To compare the reliability of shoulder balance measurement methods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: There are several measurement methods for shoulder balance. No reliability analysis has been performed despite the clinical importance of this measurement. METHODS.: Whole spine posteroanterior radiographs (n = 270) were collected to compare the reliability of the 4 shoulder balance measures in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Each radiograph was measured twice by each of the 3 examiners using 4 measurement methods. The data were analyzed statistically to determine the inter-and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS.: Overall, the 4 radiographical methods showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient regardless of severity in intraobserver comparisons (>0.904). In addition, the mean absolute difference values in all methods were low and were comparatively similar (<1.73). However, in interobserver comparisons, reliabilities were significantly decreased in the less severe radiographs, firstly on radiographical shoulder height measures (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.445, mean absolute difference <3.91). However, the intraclass correlation coefficients in the coracoid height difference and clavicular angle methods were in the excellent range (>0.810 and >0.787, respectively) regardless of severity. In addition, the mean absolute difference values in the clavicular angle method were lower (<0.62) than others. CONCLUSION.: The higher reliability of the clavicular angle and coracoid height difference methods indicate the clinical usefulness of these methods. Physicians should selectively use the shoulder balance measurement method clinically.",
keywords = "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, reliability analysis, shoulder balance measures",
author = "Jae-Young Hong and Seung-Woo Suh and Yang, {Jae Hyuk} and Park, {Si Young} and Han, {Ji Hoon}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a18486",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "26",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures

T2 - Comparison of the 4 available methods

AU - Hong, Jae-Young

AU - Suh, Seung-Woo

AU - Yang, Jae Hyuk

AU - Park, Si Young

AU - Han, Ji Hoon

PY - 2013/12/15

Y1 - 2013/12/15

N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Observational study with 3 examiners. OBJECTIVE.: To compare the reliability of shoulder balance measurement methods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: There are several measurement methods for shoulder balance. No reliability analysis has been performed despite the clinical importance of this measurement. METHODS.: Whole spine posteroanterior radiographs (n = 270) were collected to compare the reliability of the 4 shoulder balance measures in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Each radiograph was measured twice by each of the 3 examiners using 4 measurement methods. The data were analyzed statistically to determine the inter-and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS.: Overall, the 4 radiographical methods showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient regardless of severity in intraobserver comparisons (>0.904). In addition, the mean absolute difference values in all methods were low and were comparatively similar (<1.73). However, in interobserver comparisons, reliabilities were significantly decreased in the less severe radiographs, firstly on radiographical shoulder height measures (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.445, mean absolute difference <3.91). However, the intraclass correlation coefficients in the coracoid height difference and clavicular angle methods were in the excellent range (>0.810 and >0.787, respectively) regardless of severity. In addition, the mean absolute difference values in the clavicular angle method were lower (<0.62) than others. CONCLUSION.: The higher reliability of the clavicular angle and coracoid height difference methods indicate the clinical usefulness of these methods. Physicians should selectively use the shoulder balance measurement method clinically.

AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Observational study with 3 examiners. OBJECTIVE.: To compare the reliability of shoulder balance measurement methods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: There are several measurement methods for shoulder balance. No reliability analysis has been performed despite the clinical importance of this measurement. METHODS.: Whole spine posteroanterior radiographs (n = 270) were collected to compare the reliability of the 4 shoulder balance measures in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Each radiograph was measured twice by each of the 3 examiners using 4 measurement methods. The data were analyzed statistically to determine the inter-and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS.: Overall, the 4 radiographical methods showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient regardless of severity in intraobserver comparisons (>0.904). In addition, the mean absolute difference values in all methods were low and were comparatively similar (<1.73). However, in interobserver comparisons, reliabilities were significantly decreased in the less severe radiographs, firstly on radiographical shoulder height measures (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.445, mean absolute difference <3.91). However, the intraclass correlation coefficients in the coracoid height difference and clavicular angle methods were in the excellent range (>0.810 and >0.787, respectively) regardless of severity. In addition, the mean absolute difference values in the clavicular angle method were lower (<0.62) than others. CONCLUSION.: The higher reliability of the clavicular angle and coracoid height difference methods indicate the clinical usefulness of these methods. Physicians should selectively use the shoulder balance measurement method clinically.

KW - adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

KW - reliability analysis

KW - shoulder balance measures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891561557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891561557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a18486

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a18486

M3 - Article

C2 - 23804158

AN - SCOPUS:84891561557

VL - 38

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 26

ER -