Reliability and Validity of the Hospice Quality of Life Scale for Korean Cancer Patients

Su Hyun Kim, Youn Seon Choi, Juneyoung Lee, Sang Cheul Oh, Chang Hwan Yeom, Myung Ah Lee, Dae Gyeun Kim, Do Ho Moon, Dae Young Kim, Su Jin Koh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Hospice Quality of Life Scale (HQLS) for Korean cancer patients was developed as follows: 1) item generation by semi-structured interviews and review of existing scales, 2) item reduction by the Delphi method, and 3) reliability and validity test. The final HQLS consisted of 40 questions within 13 domains and the internal consistency was 0.41-0.93. The domain "Family and Economy" was uniquely separated from the general social issues, which reflects the family-oriented Asian culture. For construct validity, the HQLS scores differed significantly according to their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (known-group validity). Convergent and discriminant success rates were optimal in nine and four subscales, respectively. Total and subscale scores were significantly correlated with the related subscales in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the McMaster Quality of Life Scale, which supported the concurrent validity. HQLS was approved as an efficient tool for assessing the quality of life of Korean cancer patients who were receiving hospice and palliative care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-167
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Hospices
Reproducibility of Results
Quality of Life
Neoplasms
Hospice Care
Palliative Care
Organizations
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • cancer
  • hospice
  • Korean
  • Quality of life
  • questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Reliability and Validity of the Hospice Quality of Life Scale for Korean Cancer Patients. / Kim, Su Hyun; Choi, Youn Seon; Lee, Juneyoung; Oh, Sang Cheul; Yeom, Chang Hwan; Lee, Myung Ah; Kim, Dae Gyeun; Moon, Do Ho; Kim, Dae Young; Koh, Su Jin.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 156-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Su Hyun ; Choi, Youn Seon ; Lee, Juneyoung ; Oh, Sang Cheul ; Yeom, Chang Hwan ; Lee, Myung Ah ; Kim, Dae Gyeun ; Moon, Do Ho ; Kim, Dae Young ; Koh, Su Jin. / Reliability and Validity of the Hospice Quality of Life Scale for Korean Cancer Patients. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2009 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 156-167.
@article{7dfad83f49264adb81a3fe8cc0e66652,
title = "Reliability and Validity of the Hospice Quality of Life Scale for Korean Cancer Patients",
abstract = "The Hospice Quality of Life Scale (HQLS) for Korean cancer patients was developed as follows: 1) item generation by semi-structured interviews and review of existing scales, 2) item reduction by the Delphi method, and 3) reliability and validity test. The final HQLS consisted of 40 questions within 13 domains and the internal consistency was 0.41-0.93. The domain {"}Family and Economy{"} was uniquely separated from the general social issues, which reflects the family-oriented Asian culture. For construct validity, the HQLS scores differed significantly according to their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (known-group validity). Convergent and discriminant success rates were optimal in nine and four subscales, respectively. Total and subscale scores were significantly correlated with the related subscales in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the McMaster Quality of Life Scale, which supported the concurrent validity. HQLS was approved as an efficient tool for assessing the quality of life of Korean cancer patients who were receiving hospice and palliative care.",
keywords = "cancer, hospice, Korean, Quality of life, questionnaire",
author = "Kim, {Su Hyun} and Choi, {Youn Seon} and Juneyoung Lee and Oh, {Sang Cheul} and Yeom, {Chang Hwan} and Lee, {Myung Ah} and Kim, {Dae Gyeun} and Moon, {Do Ho} and Kim, {Dae Young} and Koh, {Su Jin}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.008",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "156--167",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and Validity of the Hospice Quality of Life Scale for Korean Cancer Patients

AU - Kim, Su Hyun

AU - Choi, Youn Seon

AU - Lee, Juneyoung

AU - Oh, Sang Cheul

AU - Yeom, Chang Hwan

AU - Lee, Myung Ah

AU - Kim, Dae Gyeun

AU - Moon, Do Ho

AU - Kim, Dae Young

AU - Koh, Su Jin

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - The Hospice Quality of Life Scale (HQLS) for Korean cancer patients was developed as follows: 1) item generation by semi-structured interviews and review of existing scales, 2) item reduction by the Delphi method, and 3) reliability and validity test. The final HQLS consisted of 40 questions within 13 domains and the internal consistency was 0.41-0.93. The domain "Family and Economy" was uniquely separated from the general social issues, which reflects the family-oriented Asian culture. For construct validity, the HQLS scores differed significantly according to their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (known-group validity). Convergent and discriminant success rates were optimal in nine and four subscales, respectively. Total and subscale scores were significantly correlated with the related subscales in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the McMaster Quality of Life Scale, which supported the concurrent validity. HQLS was approved as an efficient tool for assessing the quality of life of Korean cancer patients who were receiving hospice and palliative care.

AB - The Hospice Quality of Life Scale (HQLS) for Korean cancer patients was developed as follows: 1) item generation by semi-structured interviews and review of existing scales, 2) item reduction by the Delphi method, and 3) reliability and validity test. The final HQLS consisted of 40 questions within 13 domains and the internal consistency was 0.41-0.93. The domain "Family and Economy" was uniquely separated from the general social issues, which reflects the family-oriented Asian culture. For construct validity, the HQLS scores differed significantly according to their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (known-group validity). Convergent and discriminant success rates were optimal in nine and four subscales, respectively. Total and subscale scores were significantly correlated with the related subscales in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the McMaster Quality of Life Scale, which supported the concurrent validity. HQLS was approved as an efficient tool for assessing the quality of life of Korean cancer patients who were receiving hospice and palliative care.

KW - cancer

KW - hospice

KW - Korean

KW - Quality of life

KW - questionnaire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59849121970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59849121970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 18687571

AN - SCOPUS:59849121970

VL - 37

SP - 156

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 2

ER -