Reliability of histographic analysis for paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients with unilateral back pain using magnetic resonance imaging

Dong Won Suh, Yushin Kim, Minyoung Lee, Seungcheol Lee, Sung Jun Park, Bum-Chul Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mixed use of T1-or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in histographic analysis has impeded cross-reference of studies on fatty degeneration of muscles in patients with back pain. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to establish the measurement reliability of histographic analysis for normal and painful paraspinal muscles between T1-and T2-weighted MRI. METHODS: T1-and T2-weighted MRI at the L4-5 level were performed in 31 patients with unilateral back pain. Two raters conducted the histographic analysis on 2 separate occasions. Multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major muscles were assessed on both normal and painful sides. RESULTS: Intra-and interrater reliability of the parameters were generally excellent for both T1-(intrarater: 0.83 ± 0.13 and interrater: 0.93 ± 0.08) and T2-weighted images (intrarater: 0.93 ± 0.12 and interrater: 0.92 ± 0.12). Histogram width was fair to good for both kinds of image. Intraclass correlation coefficients were similar between painful and normal sides. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence that most histographic analysis parameters had excellent reliability for both T1-and T2-weighted images allows for cross-reference of the results between the two kinds of image. Moreover, the results of this study support the availability of histographic analysis for assessment of fatty degeneration in patients with back pain.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberBMR150352
Pages (from-to)403-412
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Paraspinal Muscles
Back Pain
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Psoas Muscles
Muscles

Keywords

  • diagnostic accuracy study
  • low back
  • Magnetic resonance imaging research
  • muscle physiology
  • pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Reliability of histographic analysis for paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients with unilateral back pain using magnetic resonance imaging. / Suh, Dong Won; Kim, Yushin; Lee, Minyoung; Lee, Seungcheol; Park, Sung Jun; Yoon, Bum-Chul.

In: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Vol. 30, No. 3, BMR150352, 01.01.2017, p. 403-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{502d11513f2940cda12e34cfb81248f8,
title = "Reliability of histographic analysis for paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients with unilateral back pain using magnetic resonance imaging",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Mixed use of T1-or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in histographic analysis has impeded cross-reference of studies on fatty degeneration of muscles in patients with back pain. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to establish the measurement reliability of histographic analysis for normal and painful paraspinal muscles between T1-and T2-weighted MRI. METHODS: T1-and T2-weighted MRI at the L4-5 level were performed in 31 patients with unilateral back pain. Two raters conducted the histographic analysis on 2 separate occasions. Multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major muscles were assessed on both normal and painful sides. RESULTS: Intra-and interrater reliability of the parameters were generally excellent for both T1-(intrarater: 0.83 ± 0.13 and interrater: 0.93 ± 0.08) and T2-weighted images (intrarater: 0.93 ± 0.12 and interrater: 0.92 ± 0.12). Histogram width was fair to good for both kinds of image. Intraclass correlation coefficients were similar between painful and normal sides. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence that most histographic analysis parameters had excellent reliability for both T1-and T2-weighted images allows for cross-reference of the results between the two kinds of image. Moreover, the results of this study support the availability of histographic analysis for assessment of fatty degeneration in patients with back pain.",
keywords = "diagnostic accuracy study, low back, Magnetic resonance imaging research, muscle physiology, pain",
author = "Suh, {Dong Won} and Yushin Kim and Minyoung Lee and Seungcheol Lee and Park, {Sung Jun} and Bum-Chul Yoon",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/BMR-150352",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "403--412",
journal = "Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8127",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of histographic analysis for paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients with unilateral back pain using magnetic resonance imaging

AU - Suh, Dong Won

AU - Kim, Yushin

AU - Lee, Minyoung

AU - Lee, Seungcheol

AU - Park, Sung Jun

AU - Yoon, Bum-Chul

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Mixed use of T1-or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in histographic analysis has impeded cross-reference of studies on fatty degeneration of muscles in patients with back pain. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to establish the measurement reliability of histographic analysis for normal and painful paraspinal muscles between T1-and T2-weighted MRI. METHODS: T1-and T2-weighted MRI at the L4-5 level were performed in 31 patients with unilateral back pain. Two raters conducted the histographic analysis on 2 separate occasions. Multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major muscles were assessed on both normal and painful sides. RESULTS: Intra-and interrater reliability of the parameters were generally excellent for both T1-(intrarater: 0.83 ± 0.13 and interrater: 0.93 ± 0.08) and T2-weighted images (intrarater: 0.93 ± 0.12 and interrater: 0.92 ± 0.12). Histogram width was fair to good for both kinds of image. Intraclass correlation coefficients were similar between painful and normal sides. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence that most histographic analysis parameters had excellent reliability for both T1-and T2-weighted images allows for cross-reference of the results between the two kinds of image. Moreover, the results of this study support the availability of histographic analysis for assessment of fatty degeneration in patients with back pain.

AB - BACKGROUND: Mixed use of T1-or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in histographic analysis has impeded cross-reference of studies on fatty degeneration of muscles in patients with back pain. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to establish the measurement reliability of histographic analysis for normal and painful paraspinal muscles between T1-and T2-weighted MRI. METHODS: T1-and T2-weighted MRI at the L4-5 level were performed in 31 patients with unilateral back pain. Two raters conducted the histographic analysis on 2 separate occasions. Multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major muscles were assessed on both normal and painful sides. RESULTS: Intra-and interrater reliability of the parameters were generally excellent for both T1-(intrarater: 0.83 ± 0.13 and interrater: 0.93 ± 0.08) and T2-weighted images (intrarater: 0.93 ± 0.12 and interrater: 0.92 ± 0.12). Histogram width was fair to good for both kinds of image. Intraclass correlation coefficients were similar between painful and normal sides. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence that most histographic analysis parameters had excellent reliability for both T1-and T2-weighted images allows for cross-reference of the results between the two kinds of image. Moreover, the results of this study support the availability of histographic analysis for assessment of fatty degeneration in patients with back pain.

KW - diagnostic accuracy study

KW - low back

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging research

KW - muscle physiology

KW - pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018931571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018931571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/BMR-150352

DO - 10.3233/BMR-150352

M3 - Article

C2 - 27858677

AN - SCOPUS:85018931571

VL - 30

SP - 403

EP - 412

JO - Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-8127

IS - 3

M1 - BMR150352

ER -