Reliability of self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among diagnostic radiologic technologists

Moon Jung Kim, Eun Shil Cha, Yousun Ko, Byung-Chul Chun, Won Jin Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the reliability of a self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among radiologic technologists. Methods: We enrolled 941 participants who had repeatedly completed the questionnaire from the 2012–2013 radiologic technologists’ health study in South Korea. We used percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability of responses on work practices. Results: Overall agreement for ever-never diagnostic radiation procedures was high (87.5–97.5%), and κ values indicated substantial agreement (0.66–0.86) in all procedures except cephalometric and intraoral radiography. For the information of year of work start and working duration, high agreement was obtained (ICC: 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). However, use of a worn dosimeter and of personal protective equipment showed only moderate to substantial agreement. Conclusions: Self-reported information on working practices regarding radiation exposure in radiologic technologists was reliable enough for epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:377–385, 2017.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-385
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 1

Fingerprint

brotizolam
Radiation
Radiologic Health
Cephalometry
Republic of Korea
Radiography
Epidemiologic Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiation Dosimeters
Radiation Exposure
Personal Protective Equipment

Keywords

  • occupational exposure
  • questionnaire
  • radiation
  • radiologic technologists
  • reproducibility
  • worker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Reliability of self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among diagnostic radiologic technologists. / Kim, Moon Jung; Cha, Eun Shil; Ko, Yousun; Chun, Byung-Chul; Lee, Won Jin.

In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 60, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 377-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6fab18d664d34680a1d55b2ba2c46e53,
title = "Reliability of self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among diagnostic radiologic technologists",
abstract = "Background: We aimed to assess the reliability of a self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among radiologic technologists. Methods: We enrolled 941 participants who had repeatedly completed the questionnaire from the 2012–2013 radiologic technologists’ health study in South Korea. We used percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability of responses on work practices. Results: Overall agreement for ever-never diagnostic radiation procedures was high (87.5–97.5{\%}), and κ values indicated substantial agreement (0.66–0.86) in all procedures except cephalometric and intraoral radiography. For the information of year of work start and working duration, high agreement was obtained (ICC: 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). However, use of a worn dosimeter and of personal protective equipment showed only moderate to substantial agreement. Conclusions: Self-reported information on working practices regarding radiation exposure in radiologic technologists was reliable enough for epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:377–385, 2017.",
keywords = "occupational exposure, questionnaire, radiation, radiologic technologists, reproducibility, worker",
author = "Kim, {Moon Jung} and Cha, {Eun Shil} and Yousun Ko and Byung-Chul Chun and Lee, {Won Jin}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajim.22704",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "377--385",
journal = "American Journal of Industrial Medicine",
issn = "0271-3586",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among diagnostic radiologic technologists

AU - Kim, Moon Jung

AU - Cha, Eun Shil

AU - Ko, Yousun

AU - Chun, Byung-Chul

AU - Lee, Won Jin

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Background: We aimed to assess the reliability of a self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among radiologic technologists. Methods: We enrolled 941 participants who had repeatedly completed the questionnaire from the 2012–2013 radiologic technologists’ health study in South Korea. We used percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability of responses on work practices. Results: Overall agreement for ever-never diagnostic radiation procedures was high (87.5–97.5%), and κ values indicated substantial agreement (0.66–0.86) in all procedures except cephalometric and intraoral radiography. For the information of year of work start and working duration, high agreement was obtained (ICC: 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). However, use of a worn dosimeter and of personal protective equipment showed only moderate to substantial agreement. Conclusions: Self-reported information on working practices regarding radiation exposure in radiologic technologists was reliable enough for epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:377–385, 2017.

AB - Background: We aimed to assess the reliability of a self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among radiologic technologists. Methods: We enrolled 941 participants who had repeatedly completed the questionnaire from the 2012–2013 radiologic technologists’ health study in South Korea. We used percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability of responses on work practices. Results: Overall agreement for ever-never diagnostic radiation procedures was high (87.5–97.5%), and κ values indicated substantial agreement (0.66–0.86) in all procedures except cephalometric and intraoral radiography. For the information of year of work start and working duration, high agreement was obtained (ICC: 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). However, use of a worn dosimeter and of personal protective equipment showed only moderate to substantial agreement. Conclusions: Self-reported information on working practices regarding radiation exposure in radiologic technologists was reliable enough for epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:377–385, 2017.

KW - occupational exposure

KW - questionnaire

KW - radiation

KW - radiologic technologists

KW - reproducibility

KW - worker

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014497535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014497535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajim.22704

DO - 10.1002/ajim.22704

M3 - Article

C2 - 28262972

AN - SCOPUS:85014497535

VL - 60

SP - 377

EP - 385

JO - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

JF - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

SN - 0271-3586

IS - 4

ER -