Repeat vertebroplasty for the subsequent refracture of procedured vertebra

Sang Sik Choi, Won Seok Hur, Jae Jin Lee, Seok Kyeong Oh, Mi Kyoung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vertebroplasty (VP) can effectively treat pain and immobility caused by vertebral compression fracture. Because of complications such as extravasation of bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) and adjacent vertebral fractures, some practitioners prefer to inject a small volume of PMMA. In that case, however, insufficient augmentation or a subsequent refracture of the treated vertebrae can occur. A 65-year-old woman visited our clinic complaining of unrelieved severe low back and bilateral flank pain even after she had undergone VP on the 1st and 4th (L1 and L4) lumbar vertebrae a month earlier. Radiologic findings showed the refracture of L1. We successfully performed the repeat VP by filling the vertebra with a sufficient volume of PMMA, and no complications occurred. The patient's pain and immobility resolved completely three days after the procedure and she remained symptom-free a month later. In conclusion, VP with small volume cement impaction may fail to relieve fracture-induced symptoms, and the refracture of an augmented vertebral body may occur. In this case, repeat VP can effectively resolve both the persistent symptoms and problems of new onset resulting from refracture of the augmented vertebral body due to insufficient volume of bone cement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-97
Number of pages4
JournalKorean Journal of Pain
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Vertebroplasty
Spine
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Bone Cements
Flank Pain
Compression Fractures
Pain
Lumbar Vertebrae

Keywords

  • Refracture
  • Repeat
  • Vertebral compression fractures
  • Vertebroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Repeat vertebroplasty for the subsequent refracture of procedured vertebra. / Choi, Sang Sik; Hur, Won Seok; Lee, Jae Jin; Oh, Seok Kyeong; Lee, Mi Kyoung.

In: Korean Journal of Pain, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 94-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Choi, Sang Sik ; Hur, Won Seok ; Lee, Jae Jin ; Oh, Seok Kyeong ; Lee, Mi Kyoung. / Repeat vertebroplasty for the subsequent refracture of procedured vertebra. In: Korean Journal of Pain. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 94-97.
@article{13a58ea37b5740d4a4cf179bc5602771,
title = "Repeat vertebroplasty for the subsequent refracture of procedured vertebra",
abstract = "Vertebroplasty (VP) can effectively treat pain and immobility caused by vertebral compression fracture. Because of complications such as extravasation of bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) and adjacent vertebral fractures, some practitioners prefer to inject a small volume of PMMA. In that case, however, insufficient augmentation or a subsequent refracture of the treated vertebrae can occur. A 65-year-old woman visited our clinic complaining of unrelieved severe low back and bilateral flank pain even after she had undergone VP on the 1st and 4th (L1 and L4) lumbar vertebrae a month earlier. Radiologic findings showed the refracture of L1. We successfully performed the repeat VP by filling the vertebra with a sufficient volume of PMMA, and no complications occurred. The patient's pain and immobility resolved completely three days after the procedure and she remained symptom-free a month later. In conclusion, VP with small volume cement impaction may fail to relieve fracture-induced symptoms, and the refracture of an augmented vertebral body may occur. In this case, repeat VP can effectively resolve both the persistent symptoms and problems of new onset resulting from refracture of the augmented vertebral body due to insufficient volume of bone cement.",
keywords = "Refracture, Repeat, Vertebral compression fractures, Vertebroplasty",
author = "Choi, {Sang Sik} and Hur, {Won Seok} and Lee, {Jae Jin} and Oh, {Seok Kyeong} and Lee, {Mi Kyoung}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.94",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "94--97",
journal = "Korean Journal of Pain",
issn = "2005-9159",
publisher = "The Korean Pain Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat vertebroplasty for the subsequent refracture of procedured vertebra

AU - Choi, Sang Sik

AU - Hur, Won Seok

AU - Lee, Jae Jin

AU - Oh, Seok Kyeong

AU - Lee, Mi Kyoung

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Vertebroplasty (VP) can effectively treat pain and immobility caused by vertebral compression fracture. Because of complications such as extravasation of bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) and adjacent vertebral fractures, some practitioners prefer to inject a small volume of PMMA. In that case, however, insufficient augmentation or a subsequent refracture of the treated vertebrae can occur. A 65-year-old woman visited our clinic complaining of unrelieved severe low back and bilateral flank pain even after she had undergone VP on the 1st and 4th (L1 and L4) lumbar vertebrae a month earlier. Radiologic findings showed the refracture of L1. We successfully performed the repeat VP by filling the vertebra with a sufficient volume of PMMA, and no complications occurred. The patient's pain and immobility resolved completely three days after the procedure and she remained symptom-free a month later. In conclusion, VP with small volume cement impaction may fail to relieve fracture-induced symptoms, and the refracture of an augmented vertebral body may occur. In this case, repeat VP can effectively resolve both the persistent symptoms and problems of new onset resulting from refracture of the augmented vertebral body due to insufficient volume of bone cement.

AB - Vertebroplasty (VP) can effectively treat pain and immobility caused by vertebral compression fracture. Because of complications such as extravasation of bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) and adjacent vertebral fractures, some practitioners prefer to inject a small volume of PMMA. In that case, however, insufficient augmentation or a subsequent refracture of the treated vertebrae can occur. A 65-year-old woman visited our clinic complaining of unrelieved severe low back and bilateral flank pain even after she had undergone VP on the 1st and 4th (L1 and L4) lumbar vertebrae a month earlier. Radiologic findings showed the refracture of L1. We successfully performed the repeat VP by filling the vertebra with a sufficient volume of PMMA, and no complications occurred. The patient's pain and immobility resolved completely three days after the procedure and she remained symptom-free a month later. In conclusion, VP with small volume cement impaction may fail to relieve fracture-induced symptoms, and the refracture of an augmented vertebral body may occur. In this case, repeat VP can effectively resolve both the persistent symptoms and problems of new onset resulting from refracture of the augmented vertebral body due to insufficient volume of bone cement.

KW - Refracture

KW - Repeat

KW - Vertebral compression fractures

KW - Vertebroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873545413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873545413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.94

DO - 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.94

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 94

EP - 97

JO - Korean Journal of Pain

JF - Korean Journal of Pain

SN - 2005-9159

IS - 1

ER -