Reporting North Korean refugees in China: The case of the U.S. Department of state human rights country reports

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices is published annually since the late 1970s. Scholars have claimed that the reports have been improved in its quality by enhancing accuracy, funding, human resources, and training. This paper focuses on the U.S. Department of State's reporting practice on the North Korean refugee issues for two reasons: first, because of its substantial importance, and second, due to methodological innovation in studying human rights reporting. An in-between-country comparison of the North Korea and China country reports on the same issue of North Korean refugees shows that the reports still suffer from the weaknesses and limitations previous scholars indicated, such as inconsistency, dependence on the available and limited information, a lack of recognition of positive developments, inaccuracy, and political biases and intentions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-144
Number of pages28
JournalKorea Observer
Volume46
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 1

Fingerprint

refugee
human rights
China
North Korea
human resources
funding
innovation
lack
trend
Refugees
Human Rights
Funding
1970s
Inconsistency
Human Resources
Innovation
Intentions

Keywords

  • China
  • Human Rights
  • North Korea
  • Refugees
  • US Department of State Human Rights Report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Reporting North Korean refugees in China : The case of the U.S. Department of state human rights country reports. / Kim, Hun Joon.

In: Korea Observer, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 117-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3dec129aa5bd453c8a13adb6de5061b5,
title = "Reporting North Korean refugees in China: The case of the U.S. Department of state human rights country reports",
abstract = "The U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices is published annually since the late 1970s. Scholars have claimed that the reports have been improved in its quality by enhancing accuracy, funding, human resources, and training. This paper focuses on the U.S. Department of State's reporting practice on the North Korean refugee issues for two reasons: first, because of its substantial importance, and second, due to methodological innovation in studying human rights reporting. An in-between-country comparison of the North Korea and China country reports on the same issue of North Korean refugees shows that the reports still suffer from the weaknesses and limitations previous scholars indicated, such as inconsistency, dependence on the available and limited information, a lack of recognition of positive developments, inaccuracy, and political biases and intentions.",
keywords = "China, Human Rights, North Korea, Refugees, US Department of State Human Rights Report",
author = "Kim, {Hun Joon}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "117--144",
journal = "Korea Observer",
issn = "0023-3919",
publisher = "Institute of Korean Studies",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting North Korean refugees in China

T2 - The case of the U.S. Department of state human rights country reports

AU - Kim, Hun Joon

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices is published annually since the late 1970s. Scholars have claimed that the reports have been improved in its quality by enhancing accuracy, funding, human resources, and training. This paper focuses on the U.S. Department of State's reporting practice on the North Korean refugee issues for two reasons: first, because of its substantial importance, and second, due to methodological innovation in studying human rights reporting. An in-between-country comparison of the North Korea and China country reports on the same issue of North Korean refugees shows that the reports still suffer from the weaknesses and limitations previous scholars indicated, such as inconsistency, dependence on the available and limited information, a lack of recognition of positive developments, inaccuracy, and political biases and intentions.

AB - The U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices is published annually since the late 1970s. Scholars have claimed that the reports have been improved in its quality by enhancing accuracy, funding, human resources, and training. This paper focuses on the U.S. Department of State's reporting practice on the North Korean refugee issues for two reasons: first, because of its substantial importance, and second, due to methodological innovation in studying human rights reporting. An in-between-country comparison of the North Korea and China country reports on the same issue of North Korean refugees shows that the reports still suffer from the weaknesses and limitations previous scholars indicated, such as inconsistency, dependence on the available and limited information, a lack of recognition of positive developments, inaccuracy, and political biases and intentions.

KW - China

KW - Human Rights

KW - North Korea

KW - Refugees

KW - US Department of State Human Rights Report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928576578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928576578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928576578

VL - 46

SP - 117

EP - 144

JO - Korea Observer

JF - Korea Observer

SN - 0023-3919

IS - 1

ER -