Reproducibility of regional pulse wave velocity in healthy subjects

Nak Bum Lee, Chang Gyu Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Despite the clinical importance and widespread use of pulse wave velocity (PWV), there are no standards for pulse sensors or for system requirements to ensure accurate pulse wave measurement. We assessed the reproducibility of PWV values using a newly developed PWV measurement system. Methods: The system used in this study was the PP-1000, which simultaneously provides regional PWV values from arteries at four different sites (carotid, femoral, radial, and dorsalis pedis). Seventeen healthy male subjects without any cardiovascular disease participated in this study. Two observers performed two consecutive measurements in the same subject in random order. To evaluate the reproducibility of the system, two sets of analyses (within-observer and between-observer) were performed. Results: The means±SD of PWV for the aorta, arm, and leg were 7.0±1.48, 8.43±1.14, and 8.09±0.98 m/s as measured by observer A and 6.76±1.00, 7.97±0.80, and 7.97±0.72 m/s by observer B, respectively. Betweenobserver differences for the aorta, arm, and leg were 0.14±0.62, 0.18±0.84, and 0.07±0.86 m/s, respectively, and the correlation coefficients were high, especially for aortic PWV (r=0.93). All the measurements showed significant correlation coefficients, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99. Conclusions: The PWV measurement system used in this study provides accurate analysis results with high reproducibility. It is necessary to provide an accurate algorithm for the detection of additional features such as flow wave, reflection wave, and dicrotic notch from a pulse waveform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalKorean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Dec 22

Fingerprint

Pulse Wave Analysis
Healthy Volunteers
Pulse
Aorta
Leg
Arm
Thigh
Cardiovascular Diseases
Arteries

Keywords

  • Arterial stiffness
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Pulse sensor
  • Pulse wave velocity
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Reproducibility of regional pulse wave velocity in healthy subjects. / Lee, Nak Bum; Park, Chang Gyu.

In: Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 1, 22.12.2009, p. 19-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39a3eaccb8ce4adc8b1f4003fd196f36,
title = "Reproducibility of regional pulse wave velocity in healthy subjects",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Despite the clinical importance and widespread use of pulse wave velocity (PWV), there are no standards for pulse sensors or for system requirements to ensure accurate pulse wave measurement. We assessed the reproducibility of PWV values using a newly developed PWV measurement system. Methods: The system used in this study was the PP-1000, which simultaneously provides regional PWV values from arteries at four different sites (carotid, femoral, radial, and dorsalis pedis). Seventeen healthy male subjects without any cardiovascular disease participated in this study. Two observers performed two consecutive measurements in the same subject in random order. To evaluate the reproducibility of the system, two sets of analyses (within-observer and between-observer) were performed. Results: The means±SD of PWV for the aorta, arm, and leg were 7.0±1.48, 8.43±1.14, and 8.09±0.98 m/s as measured by observer A and 6.76±1.00, 7.97±0.80, and 7.97±0.72 m/s by observer B, respectively. Betweenobserver differences for the aorta, arm, and leg were 0.14±0.62, 0.18±0.84, and 0.07±0.86 m/s, respectively, and the correlation coefficients were high, especially for aortic PWV (r=0.93). All the measurements showed significant correlation coefficients, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99. Conclusions: The PWV measurement system used in this study provides accurate analysis results with high reproducibility. It is necessary to provide an accurate algorithm for the detection of additional features such as flow wave, reflection wave, and dicrotic notch from a pulse waveform.",
keywords = "Arterial stiffness, Cardiovascular disease, Pulse sensor, Pulse wave velocity, Reproducibility",
author = "Lee, {Nak Bum} and Park, {Chang Gyu}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.19",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "19--23",
journal = "Korean Journal of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0494-4712",
publisher = "Korean Association of Internal Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of regional pulse wave velocity in healthy subjects

AU - Lee, Nak Bum

AU - Park, Chang Gyu

PY - 2009/12/22

Y1 - 2009/12/22

N2 - Background/Aims: Despite the clinical importance and widespread use of pulse wave velocity (PWV), there are no standards for pulse sensors or for system requirements to ensure accurate pulse wave measurement. We assessed the reproducibility of PWV values using a newly developed PWV measurement system. Methods: The system used in this study was the PP-1000, which simultaneously provides regional PWV values from arteries at four different sites (carotid, femoral, radial, and dorsalis pedis). Seventeen healthy male subjects without any cardiovascular disease participated in this study. Two observers performed two consecutive measurements in the same subject in random order. To evaluate the reproducibility of the system, two sets of analyses (within-observer and between-observer) were performed. Results: The means±SD of PWV for the aorta, arm, and leg were 7.0±1.48, 8.43±1.14, and 8.09±0.98 m/s as measured by observer A and 6.76±1.00, 7.97±0.80, and 7.97±0.72 m/s by observer B, respectively. Betweenobserver differences for the aorta, arm, and leg were 0.14±0.62, 0.18±0.84, and 0.07±0.86 m/s, respectively, and the correlation coefficients were high, especially for aortic PWV (r=0.93). All the measurements showed significant correlation coefficients, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99. Conclusions: The PWV measurement system used in this study provides accurate analysis results with high reproducibility. It is necessary to provide an accurate algorithm for the detection of additional features such as flow wave, reflection wave, and dicrotic notch from a pulse waveform.

AB - Background/Aims: Despite the clinical importance and widespread use of pulse wave velocity (PWV), there are no standards for pulse sensors or for system requirements to ensure accurate pulse wave measurement. We assessed the reproducibility of PWV values using a newly developed PWV measurement system. Methods: The system used in this study was the PP-1000, which simultaneously provides regional PWV values from arteries at four different sites (carotid, femoral, radial, and dorsalis pedis). Seventeen healthy male subjects without any cardiovascular disease participated in this study. Two observers performed two consecutive measurements in the same subject in random order. To evaluate the reproducibility of the system, two sets of analyses (within-observer and between-observer) were performed. Results: The means±SD of PWV for the aorta, arm, and leg were 7.0±1.48, 8.43±1.14, and 8.09±0.98 m/s as measured by observer A and 6.76±1.00, 7.97±0.80, and 7.97±0.72 m/s by observer B, respectively. Betweenobserver differences for the aorta, arm, and leg were 0.14±0.62, 0.18±0.84, and 0.07±0.86 m/s, respectively, and the correlation coefficients were high, especially for aortic PWV (r=0.93). All the measurements showed significant correlation coefficients, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99. Conclusions: The PWV measurement system used in this study provides accurate analysis results with high reproducibility. It is necessary to provide an accurate algorithm for the detection of additional features such as flow wave, reflection wave, and dicrotic notch from a pulse waveform.

KW - Arterial stiffness

KW - Cardiovascular disease

KW - Pulse sensor

KW - Pulse wave velocity

KW - Reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64249094768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64249094768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.19

DO - 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.19

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 19

EP - 23

JO - Korean Journal of Internal Medicine

JF - Korean Journal of Internal Medicine

SN - 0494-4712

IS - 1

ER -