Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller

D. H. Whalen, Sara Giulivi, Louis M. Goldstein, Hosung Nam, Andrea G. Levitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article by MacNeilage and Davis in this issue, entitled "In Defense of the 'Frames, then Content' (FC) Perspective on Speech Acquisition: A Response to Two Critiques" appears to assume that the only alternative to segment-level control is oscillation specifically of the jaw; however, other articulators could be oscillated by infants as well. This allows the preferred CV combinations to emerge without positing a level of segmental control in babbling. Their response does not address our modeling work, which, rather similarly to Davis's own modeling (Serkhane, Schwartz, Boë, Davis, & Matyear, 2007), shows little support for the Frame-then-Content (F/C) account. Our results show substantial support for the Articulatory Phonology (AP) one. A closer look at feeding in infants shows substantial control of the tongue and lips, casting further doubt on the foundation of the F/C account.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-249
Number of pages7
JournalLanguage Learning and Development
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jul 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

infant
phonology
Modeling
Articulator
Tongue
Oscillation
Casting
Babbling
Articulatory Phonology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Whalen, D. H., Giulivi, S., Goldstein, L. M., Nam, H., & Levitt, A. G. (2011). Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller. Language Learning and Development, 7(3), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.578547

Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller. / Whalen, D. H.; Giulivi, Sara; Goldstein, Louis M.; Nam, Hosung; Levitt, Andrea G.

In: Language Learning and Development, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.07.2011, p. 243-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whalen, DH, Giulivi, S, Goldstein, LM, Nam, H & Levitt, AG 2011, 'Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller', Language Learning and Development, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.578547
Whalen, D. H. ; Giulivi, Sara ; Goldstein, Louis M. ; Nam, Hosung ; Levitt, Andrea G. / Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller. In: Language Learning and Development. 2011 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 243-249.
@article{3233d01750294d50bad85d9c315b193c,
title = "Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller",
abstract = "The article by MacNeilage and Davis in this issue, entitled {"}In Defense of the 'Frames, then Content' (FC) Perspective on Speech Acquisition: A Response to Two Critiques{"} appears to assume that the only alternative to segment-level control is oscillation specifically of the jaw; however, other articulators could be oscillated by infants as well. This allows the preferred CV combinations to emerge without positing a level of segmental control in babbling. Their response does not address our modeling work, which, rather similarly to Davis's own modeling (Serkhane, Schwartz, Bo{\"e}, Davis, & Matyear, 2007), shows little support for the Frame-then-Content (F/C) account. Our results show substantial support for the Articulatory Phonology (AP) one. A closer look at feeding in infants shows substantial control of the tongue and lips, casting further doubt on the foundation of the F/C account.",
author = "Whalen, {D. H.} and Sara Giulivi and Goldstein, {Louis M.} and Hosung Nam and Levitt, {Andrea G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15475441.2011.578547",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "243--249",
journal = "Language Learning and Development",
issn = "1547-5441",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to MacNeilage and Davis and to Oller

AU - Whalen, D. H.

AU - Giulivi, Sara

AU - Goldstein, Louis M.

AU - Nam, Hosung

AU - Levitt, Andrea G.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - The article by MacNeilage and Davis in this issue, entitled "In Defense of the 'Frames, then Content' (FC) Perspective on Speech Acquisition: A Response to Two Critiques" appears to assume that the only alternative to segment-level control is oscillation specifically of the jaw; however, other articulators could be oscillated by infants as well. This allows the preferred CV combinations to emerge without positing a level of segmental control in babbling. Their response does not address our modeling work, which, rather similarly to Davis's own modeling (Serkhane, Schwartz, Boë, Davis, & Matyear, 2007), shows little support for the Frame-then-Content (F/C) account. Our results show substantial support for the Articulatory Phonology (AP) one. A closer look at feeding in infants shows substantial control of the tongue and lips, casting further doubt on the foundation of the F/C account.

AB - The article by MacNeilage and Davis in this issue, entitled "In Defense of the 'Frames, then Content' (FC) Perspective on Speech Acquisition: A Response to Two Critiques" appears to assume that the only alternative to segment-level control is oscillation specifically of the jaw; however, other articulators could be oscillated by infants as well. This allows the preferred CV combinations to emerge without positing a level of segmental control in babbling. Their response does not address our modeling work, which, rather similarly to Davis's own modeling (Serkhane, Schwartz, Boë, Davis, & Matyear, 2007), shows little support for the Frame-then-Content (F/C) account. Our results show substantial support for the Articulatory Phonology (AP) one. A closer look at feeding in infants shows substantial control of the tongue and lips, casting further doubt on the foundation of the F/C account.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960475635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960475635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15475441.2011.578547

DO - 10.1080/15475441.2011.578547

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 243

EP - 249

JO - Language Learning and Development

JF - Language Learning and Development

SN - 1547-5441

IS - 3

ER -