Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries

Hoon Sang Sohn, Jong-Keon Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body: Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion: Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9
JournalBiomaterials Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Mar 14

Fingerprint

Bone Substitutes
Grafts
Surgery
Bone
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Autografts
Calcium Sulfate
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
Bone Matrix
Durapatite
Orthopedics
Allografts
Minerals
Morbidity
Calcium phosphate
Hydroxyapatite
Proteins

Keywords

  • Bone graft
  • Bone morphogenetic protein
  • Bone substitutes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries. / Sohn, Hoon Sang; Oh, Jong-Keon.

In: Biomaterials Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 9, 14.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4ad4b3850ff54cbea798d2df1c049809,
title = "Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries",
abstract = "Background: Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body: Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion: Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.",
keywords = "Bone graft, Bone morphogenetic protein, Bone substitutes",
author = "Sohn, {Hoon Sang} and Jong-Keon Oh",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "Biomaterials Research",
issn = "2055-7124",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries

AU - Sohn, Hoon Sang

AU - Oh, Jong-Keon

PY - 2019/3/14

Y1 - 2019/3/14

N2 - Background: Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body: Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion: Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.

AB - Background: Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body: Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion: Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.

KW - Bone graft

KW - Bone morphogenetic protein

KW - Bone substitutes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062973838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062973838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y

DO - 10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85062973838

VL - 23

JO - Biomaterials Research

JF - Biomaterials Research

SN - 2055-7124

IS - 1

M1 - 9

ER -