Risk factors predicting the need for additional surgery in consecutive esotropia

Yong Min Choi, Joo Yeon Lee, Jae Hoon Jung, Seung Hyun Kim, Yoonae A. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors predicting surgical treatment in consecutive esotropia occurring after surgery for intermittent exotropia. Methods: The clinical records of 52 patients with consecutive esotropia who underwent exotropia surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All patients demonstrated consecutive esotropia with diplopia or suppression for more than 1 month after surgery for exotropia. Patients were divided into two groups (the surgical group and nonsurgical group) depending on whether surgery was required for consecutive esotropia. Surgery for esotropia was performed only in patients with more than 10 prism diopters (PD) esodeviation that persisted for a minimum of 6 months, those who had suppression in 1 eye or diplopia, and those who could not achieve fine stereopsis. The nonsurgical treatment up to 6 months postoperatively was part-time patching and prism therapy in both groups. Patient characteristics were evaluated in the two groups. Results: The surgical group was composed of 17 patients and the nonsurgical group was composed of 35 patients. Age, gender, refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity, and postoperative overcorrection at 1 day were not significantly different in the two groups (P > .05). However, the distance strabismic angle at 1 month postoperatively was 2.5 ±3.8 PD esodeviation (range: 14 PD esotropia to 4 PD exotropia) in the nonsurgical group and 5.4 ±5.1 PD esodeviation (range: 20 PD esotropia to orthotropia) in the surgical group; these values were statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusions: The clinically significant risk factor affecting the surgical decision for consecutive esotropia was a large esotropic angle at 1 month postoperatively in this study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-339
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Esotropia
Exotropia
Diplopia
Depth Perception
Refractive Errors
Visual Acuity
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Risk factors predicting the need for additional surgery in consecutive esotropia. / Choi, Yong Min; Lee, Joo Yeon; Jung, Jae Hoon; Kim, Seung Hyun; Cho, Yoonae A.

In: Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Vol. 50, No. 6, 01.11.2013, p. 335-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Choi, Yong Min ; Lee, Joo Yeon ; Jung, Jae Hoon ; Kim, Seung Hyun ; Cho, Yoonae A. / Risk factors predicting the need for additional surgery in consecutive esotropia. In: Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2013 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 335-339.
@article{9ae0096dd34b458e98a35156a9021acb,
title = "Risk factors predicting the need for additional surgery in consecutive esotropia",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors predicting surgical treatment in consecutive esotropia occurring after surgery for intermittent exotropia. Methods: The clinical records of 52 patients with consecutive esotropia who underwent exotropia surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All patients demonstrated consecutive esotropia with diplopia or suppression for more than 1 month after surgery for exotropia. Patients were divided into two groups (the surgical group and nonsurgical group) depending on whether surgery was required for consecutive esotropia. Surgery for esotropia was performed only in patients with more than 10 prism diopters (PD) esodeviation that persisted for a minimum of 6 months, those who had suppression in 1 eye or diplopia, and those who could not achieve fine stereopsis. The nonsurgical treatment up to 6 months postoperatively was part-time patching and prism therapy in both groups. Patient characteristics were evaluated in the two groups. Results: The surgical group was composed of 17 patients and the nonsurgical group was composed of 35 patients. Age, gender, refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity, and postoperative overcorrection at 1 day were not significantly different in the two groups (P > .05). However, the distance strabismic angle at 1 month postoperatively was 2.5 ±3.8 PD esodeviation (range: 14 PD esotropia to 4 PD exotropia) in the nonsurgical group and 5.4 ±5.1 PD esodeviation (range: 20 PD esotropia to orthotropia) in the surgical group; these values were statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusions: The clinically significant risk factor affecting the surgical decision for consecutive esotropia was a large esotropic angle at 1 month postoperatively in this study.",
author = "Choi, {Yong Min} and Lee, {Joo Yeon} and Jung, {Jae Hoon} and Kim, {Seung Hyun} and Cho, {Yoonae A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3928/01913913-20130903-01",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "335--339",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus",
issn = "0191-3913",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors predicting the need for additional surgery in consecutive esotropia

AU - Choi, Yong Min

AU - Lee, Joo Yeon

AU - Jung, Jae Hoon

AU - Kim, Seung Hyun

AU - Cho, Yoonae A.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors predicting surgical treatment in consecutive esotropia occurring after surgery for intermittent exotropia. Methods: The clinical records of 52 patients with consecutive esotropia who underwent exotropia surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All patients demonstrated consecutive esotropia with diplopia or suppression for more than 1 month after surgery for exotropia. Patients were divided into two groups (the surgical group and nonsurgical group) depending on whether surgery was required for consecutive esotropia. Surgery for esotropia was performed only in patients with more than 10 prism diopters (PD) esodeviation that persisted for a minimum of 6 months, those who had suppression in 1 eye or diplopia, and those who could not achieve fine stereopsis. The nonsurgical treatment up to 6 months postoperatively was part-time patching and prism therapy in both groups. Patient characteristics were evaluated in the two groups. Results: The surgical group was composed of 17 patients and the nonsurgical group was composed of 35 patients. Age, gender, refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity, and postoperative overcorrection at 1 day were not significantly different in the two groups (P > .05). However, the distance strabismic angle at 1 month postoperatively was 2.5 ±3.8 PD esodeviation (range: 14 PD esotropia to 4 PD exotropia) in the nonsurgical group and 5.4 ±5.1 PD esodeviation (range: 20 PD esotropia to orthotropia) in the surgical group; these values were statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusions: The clinically significant risk factor affecting the surgical decision for consecutive esotropia was a large esotropic angle at 1 month postoperatively in this study.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors predicting surgical treatment in consecutive esotropia occurring after surgery for intermittent exotropia. Methods: The clinical records of 52 patients with consecutive esotropia who underwent exotropia surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All patients demonstrated consecutive esotropia with diplopia or suppression for more than 1 month after surgery for exotropia. Patients were divided into two groups (the surgical group and nonsurgical group) depending on whether surgery was required for consecutive esotropia. Surgery for esotropia was performed only in patients with more than 10 prism diopters (PD) esodeviation that persisted for a minimum of 6 months, those who had suppression in 1 eye or diplopia, and those who could not achieve fine stereopsis. The nonsurgical treatment up to 6 months postoperatively was part-time patching and prism therapy in both groups. Patient characteristics were evaluated in the two groups. Results: The surgical group was composed of 17 patients and the nonsurgical group was composed of 35 patients. Age, gender, refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity, and postoperative overcorrection at 1 day were not significantly different in the two groups (P > .05). However, the distance strabismic angle at 1 month postoperatively was 2.5 ±3.8 PD esodeviation (range: 14 PD esotropia to 4 PD exotropia) in the nonsurgical group and 5.4 ±5.1 PD esodeviation (range: 20 PD esotropia to orthotropia) in the surgical group; these values were statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusions: The clinically significant risk factor affecting the surgical decision for consecutive esotropia was a large esotropic angle at 1 month postoperatively in this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891512429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891512429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/01913913-20130903-01

DO - 10.3928/01913913-20130903-01

M3 - Article

C2 - 24024671

AN - SCOPUS:84891512429

VL - 50

SP - 335

EP - 339

JO - Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

JF - Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

SN - 0191-3913

IS - 6

ER -