Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention alone in symptomatic patients with moderate and severe valvular aortic stenosis and coexisting coronary artery disease: Analysis of results in 56 patients

Pramod Kuchulakanti, Seung Woon Rha, Lowell F. Satler, William O. Suddath, Augusto D. Pichard, Kenneth M. Kent, Neil J. Weissman, Edouard Cheneau, Rajbabu Pakala, Daniel A. Canos, Ellen E. Pinnow, Ron Waksman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone is safe in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), and whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be deferred in patients with moderate AS by undergoing PCI alone is not known. We conducted a retrospective study of surgically inoperable patients with AS who underwent PCI (moderate AS, n = 28; and severe AS, n = 28) and compared to those with AVR (n = 55). The clinical characteristics, procedural complications, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of PCI were compared. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar except that lower age, hypertension, and renal impairment were seen in the AVR group. In-hospital complications were comparable among the 3 groups. Six-month and 1-year rates of myocardial infarction (MI), non-Q-wave MI, death and out-of-hospital death were similar between AVR and moderate AS patients (p = NS) and significantly high (p < 0.04) in patients with severe AS. On multivariate analysis, severe AS was the only significant predictor of 6-month and 1-year mortality. Our study suggests that PCI is safe in patients with moderate AS and coexisting CAD but is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe AS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)688-691
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume16
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Stenosis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
Safety
Aortic Valve
Myocardial Infarction
Renal Hypertension
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention alone in symptomatic patients with moderate and severe valvular aortic stenosis and coexisting coronary artery disease : Analysis of results in 56 patients. / Kuchulakanti, Pramod; Rha, Seung Woon; Satler, Lowell F.; Suddath, William O.; Pichard, Augusto D.; Kent, Kenneth M.; Weissman, Neil J.; Cheneau, Edouard; Pakala, Rajbabu; Canos, Daniel A.; Pinnow, Ellen E.; Waksman, Ron.

In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Vol. 16, No. 12, 01.12.2004, p. 688-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuchulakanti, P, Rha, SW, Satler, LF, Suddath, WO, Pichard, AD, Kent, KM, Weissman, NJ, Cheneau, E, Pakala, R, Canos, DA, Pinnow, EE & Waksman, R 2004, 'Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention alone in symptomatic patients with moderate and severe valvular aortic stenosis and coexisting coronary artery disease: Analysis of results in 56 patients', Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 688-691.
Kuchulakanti, Pramod ; Rha, Seung Woon ; Satler, Lowell F. ; Suddath, William O. ; Pichard, Augusto D. ; Kent, Kenneth M. ; Weissman, Neil J. ; Cheneau, Edouard ; Pakala, Rajbabu ; Canos, Daniel A. ; Pinnow, Ellen E. ; Waksman, Ron. / Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention alone in symptomatic patients with moderate and severe valvular aortic stenosis and coexisting coronary artery disease : Analysis of results in 56 patients. In: Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 12. pp. 688-691.
@article{ae057fa8f4844d0396801e2d6194b627,
title = "Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention alone in symptomatic patients with moderate and severe valvular aortic stenosis and coexisting coronary artery disease: Analysis of results in 56 patients",
abstract = "Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone is safe in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), and whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be deferred in patients with moderate AS by undergoing PCI alone is not known. We conducted a retrospective study of surgically inoperable patients with AS who underwent PCI (moderate AS, n = 28; and severe AS, n = 28) and compared to those with AVR (n = 55). The clinical characteristics, procedural complications, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of PCI were compared. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar except that lower age, hypertension, and renal impairment were seen in the AVR group. In-hospital complications were comparable among the 3 groups. Six-month and 1-year rates of myocardial infarction (MI), non-Q-wave MI, death and out-of-hospital death were similar between AVR and moderate AS patients (p = NS) and significantly high (p < 0.04) in patients with severe AS. On multivariate analysis, severe AS was the only significant predictor of 6-month and 1-year mortality. Our study suggests that PCI is safe in patients with moderate AS and coexisting CAD but is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe AS.",
author = "Pramod Kuchulakanti and Rha, {Seung Woon} and Satler, {Lowell F.} and Suddath, {William O.} and Pichard, {Augusto D.} and Kent, {Kenneth M.} and Weissman, {Neil J.} and Edouard Cheneau and Rajbabu Pakala and Canos, {Daniel A.} and Pinnow, {Ellen E.} and Ron Waksman",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "688--691",
journal = "Journal of Invasive Cardiology",
issn = "1042-3931",
publisher = "HMP Communications",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention alone in symptomatic patients with moderate and severe valvular aortic stenosis and coexisting coronary artery disease

T2 - Analysis of results in 56 patients

AU - Kuchulakanti, Pramod

AU - Rha, Seung Woon

AU - Satler, Lowell F.

AU - Suddath, William O.

AU - Pichard, Augusto D.

AU - Kent, Kenneth M.

AU - Weissman, Neil J.

AU - Cheneau, Edouard

AU - Pakala, Rajbabu

AU - Canos, Daniel A.

AU - Pinnow, Ellen E.

AU - Waksman, Ron

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone is safe in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), and whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be deferred in patients with moderate AS by undergoing PCI alone is not known. We conducted a retrospective study of surgically inoperable patients with AS who underwent PCI (moderate AS, n = 28; and severe AS, n = 28) and compared to those with AVR (n = 55). The clinical characteristics, procedural complications, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of PCI were compared. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar except that lower age, hypertension, and renal impairment were seen in the AVR group. In-hospital complications were comparable among the 3 groups. Six-month and 1-year rates of myocardial infarction (MI), non-Q-wave MI, death and out-of-hospital death were similar between AVR and moderate AS patients (p = NS) and significantly high (p < 0.04) in patients with severe AS. On multivariate analysis, severe AS was the only significant predictor of 6-month and 1-year mortality. Our study suggests that PCI is safe in patients with moderate AS and coexisting CAD but is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe AS.

AB - Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone is safe in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), and whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be deferred in patients with moderate AS by undergoing PCI alone is not known. We conducted a retrospective study of surgically inoperable patients with AS who underwent PCI (moderate AS, n = 28; and severe AS, n = 28) and compared to those with AVR (n = 55). The clinical characteristics, procedural complications, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of PCI were compared. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar except that lower age, hypertension, and renal impairment were seen in the AVR group. In-hospital complications were comparable among the 3 groups. Six-month and 1-year rates of myocardial infarction (MI), non-Q-wave MI, death and out-of-hospital death were similar between AVR and moderate AS patients (p = NS) and significantly high (p < 0.04) in patients with severe AS. On multivariate analysis, severe AS was the only significant predictor of 6-month and 1-year mortality. Our study suggests that PCI is safe in patients with moderate AS and coexisting CAD but is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe AS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16644363769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16644363769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15596870

AN - SCOPUS:16644363769

VL - 16

SP - 688

EP - 691

JO - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

JF - Journal of Invasive Cardiology

SN - 1042-3931

IS - 12

ER -