Sensitivity of cognitive tests in four cognitive domains in discriminating MDD patients from healthy controls

A meta-analysis

Jae Hyoung Lim, In Kyung Oh, Changsu Han, Yu Jeong Huh, In Kwa Jung, Ashwin A. Patkar, David C. Steffens, Bo Hyoung Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: We performed a meta-analysis in order to determine which neuropsychological domains and tasks would be most sensitive for discriminating between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls. Methods: Relevant articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for the period between January 1997 and May 2011. A meta-analysis was conducted using the standardized means of individual cognitive tests in each domain. The heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses according to age and medication status were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 22 trials involving 955 MDD patients and 7,664 healthy participants were selected for our meta-analysis. MDD patients showed significantly impaired results compared with healthy participants on the Digit Span and Continuous Performance Test in the attention domain; the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and the Digit Symbol Test in the processing speed domain; the Stroop Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Verbal Fluency in the executive function domain; and immediate verbal memory in the memory domain. The Finger Tapping Task, TMT-B, delayed verbal memory, and immediate and delayed visual memory failed to separate MDD patients from healthy controls. The results of subgroup analysis showed that performance of Verbal Fluency was significantly impaired in younger depressed patients (<60 years), and immediate visual memory was significantly reduced in depressed patients using antidepressants. Conclusions: Our findings have inevitable limitations arising from methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and we could not explain high heterogeneity between studies. Despite such limitations, current study has the strength of being the first meta-analysis which tried to specify cognitive function of depressed patients compared with healthy participants. And our findings may provide clinicians with further evidences that some cognitive tests in specific cognitive domains have sensitivity to discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1543-1557
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Major Depressive Disorder
Meta-Analysis
Repression (Psychology)
Healthy Volunteers
Short-Term Memory
Trail Making Test
Stroop Test
Executive Function
PubMed
Cognition
Antidepressive Agents
Fingers
Libraries
Databases

Keywords

  • cognitive function
  • major depressive disorder
  • meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Sensitivity of cognitive tests in four cognitive domains in discriminating MDD patients from healthy controls : A meta-analysis. / Lim, Jae Hyoung; Oh, In Kyung; Han, Changsu; Huh, Yu Jeong; Jung, In Kwa; Patkar, Ashwin A.; Steffens, David C.; Jang, Bo Hyoung.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 25, No. 9, 01.09.2013, p. 1543-1557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lim, Jae Hyoung ; Oh, In Kyung ; Han, Changsu ; Huh, Yu Jeong ; Jung, In Kwa ; Patkar, Ashwin A. ; Steffens, David C. ; Jang, Bo Hyoung. / Sensitivity of cognitive tests in four cognitive domains in discriminating MDD patients from healthy controls : A meta-analysis. In: International Psychogeriatrics. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 9. pp. 1543-1557.
@article{e15bef6cd17f405e8357497ebac12949,
title = "Sensitivity of cognitive tests in four cognitive domains in discriminating MDD patients from healthy controls: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "ABSTRACT Background: We performed a meta-analysis in order to determine which neuropsychological domains and tasks would be most sensitive for discriminating between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls. Methods: Relevant articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for the period between January 1997 and May 2011. A meta-analysis was conducted using the standardized means of individual cognitive tests in each domain. The heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses according to age and medication status were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 22 trials involving 955 MDD patients and 7,664 healthy participants were selected for our meta-analysis. MDD patients showed significantly impaired results compared with healthy participants on the Digit Span and Continuous Performance Test in the attention domain; the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and the Digit Symbol Test in the processing speed domain; the Stroop Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Verbal Fluency in the executive function domain; and immediate verbal memory in the memory domain. The Finger Tapping Task, TMT-B, delayed verbal memory, and immediate and delayed visual memory failed to separate MDD patients from healthy controls. The results of subgroup analysis showed that performance of Verbal Fluency was significantly impaired in younger depressed patients (<60 years), and immediate visual memory was significantly reduced in depressed patients using antidepressants. Conclusions: Our findings have inevitable limitations arising from methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and we could not explain high heterogeneity between studies. Despite such limitations, current study has the strength of being the first meta-analysis which tried to specify cognitive function of depressed patients compared with healthy participants. And our findings may provide clinicians with further evidences that some cognitive tests in specific cognitive domains have sensitivity to discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls.",
keywords = "cognitive function, major depressive disorder, meta-analysis",
author = "Lim, {Jae Hyoung} and Oh, {In Kyung} and Changsu Han and Huh, {Yu Jeong} and Jung, {In Kwa} and Patkar, {Ashwin A.} and Steffens, {David C.} and Jang, {Bo Hyoung}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610213000689",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1543--1557",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of cognitive tests in four cognitive domains in discriminating MDD patients from healthy controls

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Lim, Jae Hyoung

AU - Oh, In Kyung

AU - Han, Changsu

AU - Huh, Yu Jeong

AU - Jung, In Kwa

AU - Patkar, Ashwin A.

AU - Steffens, David C.

AU - Jang, Bo Hyoung

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - ABSTRACT Background: We performed a meta-analysis in order to determine which neuropsychological domains and tasks would be most sensitive for discriminating between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls. Methods: Relevant articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for the period between January 1997 and May 2011. A meta-analysis was conducted using the standardized means of individual cognitive tests in each domain. The heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses according to age and medication status were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 22 trials involving 955 MDD patients and 7,664 healthy participants were selected for our meta-analysis. MDD patients showed significantly impaired results compared with healthy participants on the Digit Span and Continuous Performance Test in the attention domain; the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and the Digit Symbol Test in the processing speed domain; the Stroop Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Verbal Fluency in the executive function domain; and immediate verbal memory in the memory domain. The Finger Tapping Task, TMT-B, delayed verbal memory, and immediate and delayed visual memory failed to separate MDD patients from healthy controls. The results of subgroup analysis showed that performance of Verbal Fluency was significantly impaired in younger depressed patients (<60 years), and immediate visual memory was significantly reduced in depressed patients using antidepressants. Conclusions: Our findings have inevitable limitations arising from methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and we could not explain high heterogeneity between studies. Despite such limitations, current study has the strength of being the first meta-analysis which tried to specify cognitive function of depressed patients compared with healthy participants. And our findings may provide clinicians with further evidences that some cognitive tests in specific cognitive domains have sensitivity to discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls.

AB - ABSTRACT Background: We performed a meta-analysis in order to determine which neuropsychological domains and tasks would be most sensitive for discriminating between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls. Methods: Relevant articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for the period between January 1997 and May 2011. A meta-analysis was conducted using the standardized means of individual cognitive tests in each domain. The heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses according to age and medication status were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 22 trials involving 955 MDD patients and 7,664 healthy participants were selected for our meta-analysis. MDD patients showed significantly impaired results compared with healthy participants on the Digit Span and Continuous Performance Test in the attention domain; the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and the Digit Symbol Test in the processing speed domain; the Stroop Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Verbal Fluency in the executive function domain; and immediate verbal memory in the memory domain. The Finger Tapping Task, TMT-B, delayed verbal memory, and immediate and delayed visual memory failed to separate MDD patients from healthy controls. The results of subgroup analysis showed that performance of Verbal Fluency was significantly impaired in younger depressed patients (<60 years), and immediate visual memory was significantly reduced in depressed patients using antidepressants. Conclusions: Our findings have inevitable limitations arising from methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and we could not explain high heterogeneity between studies. Despite such limitations, current study has the strength of being the first meta-analysis which tried to specify cognitive function of depressed patients compared with healthy participants. And our findings may provide clinicians with further evidences that some cognitive tests in specific cognitive domains have sensitivity to discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls.

KW - cognitive function

KW - major depressive disorder

KW - meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881039275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881039275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610213000689

DO - 10.1017/S1041610213000689

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1543

EP - 1557

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

IS - 9

ER -