Sexual function and psychological characteristics of penile paraffinoma

Du Geon Moon, Jeong Woo Yoo, Jae Hyun Bae, Changsu Han, Yong Ku Kim, Je-Jong Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To identify the sexual, emotional and psychological status of men who augmented their penis with mineral oil injection for their small penis. Methods: Men who had penile paraffin were asked to answer the semi-structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed to assess the motivation, method of penile injection, changes in erectile function and satisfaction after penile injection. SCL (Symptom checklist)-90-R, STAI (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory) and Zung SDS (Self-rating depression scale) were also included in the questionnaire for psychological evaluation. Results: A total of 357 men completed the questionnaire. The first-ranked motivation of the injection was recommendation by their acquaintances (48.9 %). The majority of the respondents had the procedure by non-medical person (78.0 %). Before injection, 17.2 % had a sense of inferiority in their penis and 32 % worried about their weak erectile function. After injection, 33.0 % have found relief from their sense of inferiority and 17.8 % wish to feel improvement in their erectile function. Most of the respondents (91 %) were not satisfied with their penis and 74 % of them replied that they want to remove the injected material. Only 15.6 % did not experience side effects. Most of the subjects have suffered from various side effects such as inflammation, skin necrosis, pain, etc. No evidence of psychiatric pathology was found in psychological evaluation. Conclusion: The motivations of mineral oil injection were recommendation by their acquaintances or desire to be more mannish. Most of them had suffered from various side effects and only a small number of them felt improvement in their sense of inferiority, in their penis and erectile function. Increased public awareness is needed for the prevention of this physically and psychologically debilitating problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-194
Number of pages4
JournalAsian Journal of Andrology
Volume5
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Penis
Psychology
Injections
Motivation
Mineral Oil
Checklist
Paraffin
Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires
Necrosis
Anxiety
Depression
Pathology
Inflammation
Pain
Equipment and Supplies
Skin

Keywords

  • Augmentation
  • Paraffinoma
  • Penis
  • Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Sexual function and psychological characteristics of penile paraffinoma. / Moon, Du Geon; Yoo, Jeong Woo; Bae, Jae Hyun; Han, Changsu; Kim, Yong Ku; Kim, Je-Jong.

In: Asian Journal of Andrology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.09.2003, p. 191-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8aabfa76f2884e0dbde91843fcfec6d5,
title = "Sexual function and psychological characteristics of penile paraffinoma",
abstract = "Aim: To identify the sexual, emotional and psychological status of men who augmented their penis with mineral oil injection for their small penis. Methods: Men who had penile paraffin were asked to answer the semi-structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed to assess the motivation, method of penile injection, changes in erectile function and satisfaction after penile injection. SCL (Symptom checklist)-90-R, STAI (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory) and Zung SDS (Self-rating depression scale) were also included in the questionnaire for psychological evaluation. Results: A total of 357 men completed the questionnaire. The first-ranked motivation of the injection was recommendation by their acquaintances (48.9 {\%}). The majority of the respondents had the procedure by non-medical person (78.0 {\%}). Before injection, 17.2 {\%} had a sense of inferiority in their penis and 32 {\%} worried about their weak erectile function. After injection, 33.0 {\%} have found relief from their sense of inferiority and 17.8 {\%} wish to feel improvement in their erectile function. Most of the respondents (91 {\%}) were not satisfied with their penis and 74 {\%} of them replied that they want to remove the injected material. Only 15.6 {\%} did not experience side effects. Most of the subjects have suffered from various side effects such as inflammation, skin necrosis, pain, etc. No evidence of psychiatric pathology was found in psychological evaluation. Conclusion: The motivations of mineral oil injection were recommendation by their acquaintances or desire to be more mannish. Most of them had suffered from various side effects and only a small number of them felt improvement in their sense of inferiority, in their penis and erectile function. Increased public awareness is needed for the prevention of this physically and psychologically debilitating problem.",
keywords = "Augmentation, Paraffinoma, Penis, Psychology",
author = "Moon, {Du Geon} and Yoo, {Jeong Woo} and Bae, {Jae Hyun} and Changsu Han and Kim, {Yong Ku} and Je-Jong Kim",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "191--194",
journal = "Asian Journal of Andrology",
issn = "1008-682X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual function and psychological characteristics of penile paraffinoma

AU - Moon, Du Geon

AU - Yoo, Jeong Woo

AU - Bae, Jae Hyun

AU - Han, Changsu

AU - Kim, Yong Ku

AU - Kim, Je-Jong

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Aim: To identify the sexual, emotional and psychological status of men who augmented their penis with mineral oil injection for their small penis. Methods: Men who had penile paraffin were asked to answer the semi-structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed to assess the motivation, method of penile injection, changes in erectile function and satisfaction after penile injection. SCL (Symptom checklist)-90-R, STAI (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory) and Zung SDS (Self-rating depression scale) were also included in the questionnaire for psychological evaluation. Results: A total of 357 men completed the questionnaire. The first-ranked motivation of the injection was recommendation by their acquaintances (48.9 %). The majority of the respondents had the procedure by non-medical person (78.0 %). Before injection, 17.2 % had a sense of inferiority in their penis and 32 % worried about their weak erectile function. After injection, 33.0 % have found relief from their sense of inferiority and 17.8 % wish to feel improvement in their erectile function. Most of the respondents (91 %) were not satisfied with their penis and 74 % of them replied that they want to remove the injected material. Only 15.6 % did not experience side effects. Most of the subjects have suffered from various side effects such as inflammation, skin necrosis, pain, etc. No evidence of psychiatric pathology was found in psychological evaluation. Conclusion: The motivations of mineral oil injection were recommendation by their acquaintances or desire to be more mannish. Most of them had suffered from various side effects and only a small number of them felt improvement in their sense of inferiority, in their penis and erectile function. Increased public awareness is needed for the prevention of this physically and psychologically debilitating problem.

AB - Aim: To identify the sexual, emotional and psychological status of men who augmented their penis with mineral oil injection for their small penis. Methods: Men who had penile paraffin were asked to answer the semi-structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed to assess the motivation, method of penile injection, changes in erectile function and satisfaction after penile injection. SCL (Symptom checklist)-90-R, STAI (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory) and Zung SDS (Self-rating depression scale) were also included in the questionnaire for psychological evaluation. Results: A total of 357 men completed the questionnaire. The first-ranked motivation of the injection was recommendation by their acquaintances (48.9 %). The majority of the respondents had the procedure by non-medical person (78.0 %). Before injection, 17.2 % had a sense of inferiority in their penis and 32 % worried about their weak erectile function. After injection, 33.0 % have found relief from their sense of inferiority and 17.8 % wish to feel improvement in their erectile function. Most of the respondents (91 %) were not satisfied with their penis and 74 % of them replied that they want to remove the injected material. Only 15.6 % did not experience side effects. Most of the subjects have suffered from various side effects such as inflammation, skin necrosis, pain, etc. No evidence of psychiatric pathology was found in psychological evaluation. Conclusion: The motivations of mineral oil injection were recommendation by their acquaintances or desire to be more mannish. Most of them had suffered from various side effects and only a small number of them felt improvement in their sense of inferiority, in their penis and erectile function. Increased public awareness is needed for the prevention of this physically and psychologically debilitating problem.

KW - Augmentation

KW - Paraffinoma

KW - Penis

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042378977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042378977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 191

EP - 194

JO - Asian Journal of Andrology

JF - Asian Journal of Andrology

SN - 1008-682X

IS - 3

ER -