Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems

Stefano Schiavon, Kwang Ho Lee, Fred Bauman, Tom Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. The simplified design tool is able to account for key differences between UFAD and traditional mixing overhead (OH) systems. These include: (1) difference between design day cooling load profiles, (2) impact of a thermally stratified environment for UFAD versus well-mixed for OH, and (3) impact of heat transfer (temperature gain) in underfloor air supply plenums. The new design tool allows the use of a familiar load calculation procedure for OH mixing systems as input to the UFAD design tool. Based on 87 EnergyPlus simulations, four regression models have been developed to transform the OH cooling load into the UFAD cooling load, and then to split this total load between the supply plenum, zone (room), and return plenum. The regression models mainly depend on floor level, and position (interior or perimeter) and orientation of the zone under analysis. Although considered in the analysis, supply air temperature, window-to-wall ratio, internal heat gain, plenum configuration, climate, presence of the carpet and structure type do not strongly influence the developed models. The results show that, generally, UFAD has a peak cooling load 19% higher than an overhead cooling load and 22% and 37% of the total zone UFAD cooling load goes to the supply plenum in the perimeter and interior, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-528
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume43
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cooling
Air
Heat transfer
Temperature

Keywords

  • Cooling load
  • HVAC sizing
  • Mixing ventilation
  • Overhead air distribution (OH)
  • Underfloor air distribution (UFAD)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. / Schiavon, Stefano; Lee, Kwang Ho; Bauman, Fred; Webster, Tom.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, 01.02.2011, p. 517-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schiavon, Stefano ; Lee, Kwang Ho ; Bauman, Fred ; Webster, Tom. / Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. In: Energy and Buildings. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 2-3. pp. 517-528.
@article{71d1b83655ec4f02bc0ec9c6bb81085b,
title = "Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems",
abstract = "This paper describes the development of a simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. The simplified design tool is able to account for key differences between UFAD and traditional mixing overhead (OH) systems. These include: (1) difference between design day cooling load profiles, (2) impact of a thermally stratified environment for UFAD versus well-mixed for OH, and (3) impact of heat transfer (temperature gain) in underfloor air supply plenums. The new design tool allows the use of a familiar load calculation procedure for OH mixing systems as input to the UFAD design tool. Based on 87 EnergyPlus simulations, four regression models have been developed to transform the OH cooling load into the UFAD cooling load, and then to split this total load between the supply plenum, zone (room), and return plenum. The regression models mainly depend on floor level, and position (interior or perimeter) and orientation of the zone under analysis. Although considered in the analysis, supply air temperature, window-to-wall ratio, internal heat gain, plenum configuration, climate, presence of the carpet and structure type do not strongly influence the developed models. The results show that, generally, UFAD has a peak cooling load 19{\%} higher than an overhead cooling load and 22{\%} and 37{\%} of the total zone UFAD cooling load goes to the supply plenum in the perimeter and interior, respectively.",
keywords = "Cooling load, HVAC sizing, Mixing ventilation, Overhead air distribution (OH), Underfloor air distribution (UFAD)",
author = "Stefano Schiavon and Lee, {Kwang Ho} and Fred Bauman and Tom Webster",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.017",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "517--528",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems

AU - Schiavon, Stefano

AU - Lee, Kwang Ho

AU - Bauman, Fred

AU - Webster, Tom

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - This paper describes the development of a simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. The simplified design tool is able to account for key differences between UFAD and traditional mixing overhead (OH) systems. These include: (1) difference between design day cooling load profiles, (2) impact of a thermally stratified environment for UFAD versus well-mixed for OH, and (3) impact of heat transfer (temperature gain) in underfloor air supply plenums. The new design tool allows the use of a familiar load calculation procedure for OH mixing systems as input to the UFAD design tool. Based on 87 EnergyPlus simulations, four regression models have been developed to transform the OH cooling load into the UFAD cooling load, and then to split this total load between the supply plenum, zone (room), and return plenum. The regression models mainly depend on floor level, and position (interior or perimeter) and orientation of the zone under analysis. Although considered in the analysis, supply air temperature, window-to-wall ratio, internal heat gain, plenum configuration, climate, presence of the carpet and structure type do not strongly influence the developed models. The results show that, generally, UFAD has a peak cooling load 19% higher than an overhead cooling load and 22% and 37% of the total zone UFAD cooling load goes to the supply plenum in the perimeter and interior, respectively.

AB - This paper describes the development of a simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. The simplified design tool is able to account for key differences between UFAD and traditional mixing overhead (OH) systems. These include: (1) difference between design day cooling load profiles, (2) impact of a thermally stratified environment for UFAD versus well-mixed for OH, and (3) impact of heat transfer (temperature gain) in underfloor air supply plenums. The new design tool allows the use of a familiar load calculation procedure for OH mixing systems as input to the UFAD design tool. Based on 87 EnergyPlus simulations, four regression models have been developed to transform the OH cooling load into the UFAD cooling load, and then to split this total load between the supply plenum, zone (room), and return plenum. The regression models mainly depend on floor level, and position (interior or perimeter) and orientation of the zone under analysis. Although considered in the analysis, supply air temperature, window-to-wall ratio, internal heat gain, plenum configuration, climate, presence of the carpet and structure type do not strongly influence the developed models. The results show that, generally, UFAD has a peak cooling load 19% higher than an overhead cooling load and 22% and 37% of the total zone UFAD cooling load goes to the supply plenum in the perimeter and interior, respectively.

KW - Cooling load

KW - HVAC sizing

KW - Mixing ventilation

KW - Overhead air distribution (OH)

KW - Underfloor air distribution (UFAD)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651435547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651435547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78651435547

VL - 43

SP - 517

EP - 528

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

IS - 2-3

ER -