Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I

Analysis methods

Hangseok Choi, David E. Daniel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysis of a slug test to estimate hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall is complicated by the high compressibility of the backfill materials and by the proximity of the well intake section to the edge of the cutoff wall. The writers developed two methods to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall with the aid of a numerical program, Slug_3D. The first method, named the type curve method, expands the general type curve concept frequently used by hydrogeologists to take into account the complex boundary conditions of the vertical cutoff wall. The other method, named the modified linear curve fitting method and modified from the Hvorslev and the Bouwer and Rice methods, provides an easy and practical way of evaluating hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall. To illustrate the use of the type curve and the modified linear curve fitting methods in practice, a case study involving two slug tests at a landfill site is presented. The methods are shown to be useful and practical.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-438
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume132
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Apr 1

Fingerprint

slug test
cutoff wall
Hydraulic conductivity
Curve fitting
Land fill
Compressibility
hydraulic conductivity
Boundary conditions
analysis
method
slug
backfill
compressibility
landfill
boundary condition
rice

Keywords

  • Backfills
  • Bentonite
  • Core walls
  • Curve fitting
  • Hydraulic conductivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I : Analysis methods. / Choi, Hangseok; Daniel, David E.

In: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 4, 01.04.2006, p. 429-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c7f738a97124cdda5cffc6b853ee296,
title = "Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I: Analysis methods",
abstract = "Analysis of a slug test to estimate hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall is complicated by the high compressibility of the backfill materials and by the proximity of the well intake section to the edge of the cutoff wall. The writers developed two methods to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall with the aid of a numerical program, Slug_3D. The first method, named the type curve method, expands the general type curve concept frequently used by hydrogeologists to take into account the complex boundary conditions of the vertical cutoff wall. The other method, named the modified linear curve fitting method and modified from the Hvorslev and the Bouwer and Rice methods, provides an easy and practical way of evaluating hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall. To illustrate the use of the type curve and the modified linear curve fitting methods in practice, a case study involving two slug tests at a landfill site is presented. The methods are shown to be useful and practical.",
keywords = "Backfills, Bentonite, Core walls, Curve fitting, Hydraulic conductivity",
author = "Hangseok Choi and Daniel, {David E.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:4(429)",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "429--438",
journal = "Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "1090-0241",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I

T2 - Analysis methods

AU - Choi, Hangseok

AU - Daniel, David E.

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Analysis of a slug test to estimate hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall is complicated by the high compressibility of the backfill materials and by the proximity of the well intake section to the edge of the cutoff wall. The writers developed two methods to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall with the aid of a numerical program, Slug_3D. The first method, named the type curve method, expands the general type curve concept frequently used by hydrogeologists to take into account the complex boundary conditions of the vertical cutoff wall. The other method, named the modified linear curve fitting method and modified from the Hvorslev and the Bouwer and Rice methods, provides an easy and practical way of evaluating hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall. To illustrate the use of the type curve and the modified linear curve fitting methods in practice, a case study involving two slug tests at a landfill site is presented. The methods are shown to be useful and practical.

AB - Analysis of a slug test to estimate hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall is complicated by the high compressibility of the backfill materials and by the proximity of the well intake section to the edge of the cutoff wall. The writers developed two methods to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall with the aid of a numerical program, Slug_3D. The first method, named the type curve method, expands the general type curve concept frequently used by hydrogeologists to take into account the complex boundary conditions of the vertical cutoff wall. The other method, named the modified linear curve fitting method and modified from the Hvorslev and the Bouwer and Rice methods, provides an easy and practical way of evaluating hydraulic conductivity of the vertical cutoff wall. To illustrate the use of the type curve and the modified linear curve fitting methods in practice, a case study involving two slug tests at a landfill site is presented. The methods are shown to be useful and practical.

KW - Backfills

KW - Bentonite

KW - Core walls

KW - Curve fitting

KW - Hydraulic conductivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745021964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745021964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:4(429)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:4(429)

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 429

EP - 438

JO - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

SN - 1090-0241

IS - 4

ER -