Slug test analysis to evaluate permeability of compressible materials Hangseok Choi

Hangseok Choi, The Bao Nguyen, Chulho Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The line-fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic materials. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible geologic formation, these conventional methods may have difficulties fitting a straight line to the semilogarithmic plot of the test data. Data from relatively compressible geologic formations frequently show a concave-upward curvature because of the effect of the compressibility or specific storage (Ss). To take into account the compressibility of geologic formations, a modified line-fitting method is introduced, which expands on Chirlin's (1989) approach to the case of a partially penetrating well with the basic-time-lag fitting method. A case study for a compressible till is made to verify the proposed method by comparing the results from the proposed methods with those obtained using a type-curve method (Kansas Geological Survey method [Hyder et al. 1994]).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-652
Number of pages6
JournalGround Water
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jul 1

Fingerprint

slug test
Gastropoda
Compressibility
Permeability
permeability
Geological surveys
Hydraulic conductivity
compressibility
analysis
method
material
survey method
geological survey
curvature
hydraulic conductivity
rice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Computers in Earth Sciences
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Slug test analysis to evaluate permeability of compressible materials Hangseok Choi. / Choi, Hangseok; Nguyen, The Bao; Lee, Chulho.

In: Ground Water, Vol. 46, No. 4, 01.07.2008, p. 647-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Choi, Hangseok ; Nguyen, The Bao ; Lee, Chulho. / Slug test analysis to evaluate permeability of compressible materials Hangseok Choi. In: Ground Water. 2008 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 647-652.
@article{e011096b56414c438525e3697cede5f3,
title = "Slug test analysis to evaluate permeability of compressible materials Hangseok Choi",
abstract = "The line-fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic materials. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible geologic formation, these conventional methods may have difficulties fitting a straight line to the semilogarithmic plot of the test data. Data from relatively compressible geologic formations frequently show a concave-upward curvature because of the effect of the compressibility or specific storage (Ss). To take into account the compressibility of geologic formations, a modified line-fitting method is introduced, which expands on Chirlin's (1989) approach to the case of a partially penetrating well with the basic-time-lag fitting method. A case study for a compressible till is made to verify the proposed method by comparing the results from the proposed methods with those obtained using a type-curve method (Kansas Geological Survey method [Hyder et al. 1994]).",
author = "Hangseok Choi and Nguyen, {The Bao} and Chulho Lee",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00453.x",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "647--652",
journal = "Groundwater",
issn = "0017-467X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Slug test analysis to evaluate permeability of compressible materials Hangseok Choi

AU - Choi, Hangseok

AU - Nguyen, The Bao

AU - Lee, Chulho

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - The line-fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic materials. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible geologic formation, these conventional methods may have difficulties fitting a straight line to the semilogarithmic plot of the test data. Data from relatively compressible geologic formations frequently show a concave-upward curvature because of the effect of the compressibility or specific storage (Ss). To take into account the compressibility of geologic formations, a modified line-fitting method is introduced, which expands on Chirlin's (1989) approach to the case of a partially penetrating well with the basic-time-lag fitting method. A case study for a compressible till is made to verify the proposed method by comparing the results from the proposed methods with those obtained using a type-curve method (Kansas Geological Survey method [Hyder et al. 1994]).

AB - The line-fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic materials. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible geologic formation, these conventional methods may have difficulties fitting a straight line to the semilogarithmic plot of the test data. Data from relatively compressible geologic formations frequently show a concave-upward curvature because of the effect of the compressibility or specific storage (Ss). To take into account the compressibility of geologic formations, a modified line-fitting method is introduced, which expands on Chirlin's (1989) approach to the case of a partially penetrating well with the basic-time-lag fitting method. A case study for a compressible till is made to verify the proposed method by comparing the results from the proposed methods with those obtained using a type-curve method (Kansas Geological Survey method [Hyder et al. 1994]).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49649086148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49649086148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00453.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00453.x

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 647

EP - 652

JO - Groundwater

JF - Groundwater

SN - 0017-467X

IS - 4

ER -