Social capital and the third way in public health

Carles Muntaner, John Lynch, George Davey Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The construct of social capital has recently captured the interest of researchers in social epidemiology and public health. We review current hypotheses on the social capital and health link, and examine the empirical evidence available as well as its implications for health policy. With regard to theory, we contend that the construct as currently employed in the public health literature, lacks depth compared to its uses in social science. In addition, social capital presents itself as an alternative to materialist structural inequalities (class, gender and race) by bringing to the forefront of social epidemiology an appealing common sense idealist social psychology to which everyone can relate (e.g., good relations with your community are good for your health). The use of social capital invokes a romanticized view of communities without social conflict (e.g., Neo - Tocquevillian nineteenth century associationalism) and favours an idealist psychology over a psychology connected to both material resources and social structure. We argue that the evidence on social capital as a determinant of better health is still scant or ambiguous - depending on the definition that is used. Even if confirmed, social capital hypotheses call for social determinants beyond the proximal realm of social psychology. We also maintain that social capital is used in public health as an alternative to both state-centred economic redistribution (e.g., living wage, full employment, and universal health insurance) and party politics (e.g., gaining control of the executive branch of the government). Social capital represents a 'privatization' of both economics and politics. Such uses of social capital mirror recent Third Way policies in Germany, UK and US. If Third Way policies end up losing support in Europe, its prominence there might be short lived. In the USA, where the working class is less likely to influence social policy, interest in social capital could be longer lived or, alternatively, could drift in the academic limbo like other psychosocial constructs which at one point were heralded as the next 'big idea'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalCritical Public Health
Volume10
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health
Social Psychology
Politics
Health
Epidemiology
Economics
Social Capital
Privatization
Psychology
Social Sciences
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Executive Function
Health Insurance
Public Policy
Health Policy
Germany
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Muntaner, C., Lynch, J., & Smith, G. D. (2000). Social capital and the third way in public health. Critical Public Health, 10(2), 119-124.

Social capital and the third way in public health. / Muntaner, Carles; Lynch, John; Smith, George Davey.

In: Critical Public Health, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.12.2000, p. 119-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muntaner, C, Lynch, J & Smith, GD 2000, 'Social capital and the third way in public health', Critical Public Health, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 119-124.
Muntaner C, Lynch J, Smith GD. Social capital and the third way in public health. Critical Public Health. 2000 Dec 1;10(2):119-124.
Muntaner, Carles ; Lynch, John ; Smith, George Davey. / Social capital and the third way in public health. In: Critical Public Health. 2000 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 119-124.
@article{1bf8c90a81e445d7841d67240127c0c0,
title = "Social capital and the third way in public health",
abstract = "The construct of social capital has recently captured the interest of researchers in social epidemiology and public health. We review current hypotheses on the social capital and health link, and examine the empirical evidence available as well as its implications for health policy. With regard to theory, we contend that the construct as currently employed in the public health literature, lacks depth compared to its uses in social science. In addition, social capital presents itself as an alternative to materialist structural inequalities (class, gender and race) by bringing to the forefront of social epidemiology an appealing common sense idealist social psychology to which everyone can relate (e.g., good relations with your community are good for your health). The use of social capital invokes a romanticized view of communities without social conflict (e.g., Neo - Tocquevillian nineteenth century associationalism) and favours an idealist psychology over a psychology connected to both material resources and social structure. We argue that the evidence on social capital as a determinant of better health is still scant or ambiguous - depending on the definition that is used. Even if confirmed, social capital hypotheses call for social determinants beyond the proximal realm of social psychology. We also maintain that social capital is used in public health as an alternative to both state-centred economic redistribution (e.g., living wage, full employment, and universal health insurance) and party politics (e.g., gaining control of the executive branch of the government). Social capital represents a 'privatization' of both economics and politics. Such uses of social capital mirror recent Third Way policies in Germany, UK and US. If Third Way policies end up losing support in Europe, its prominence there might be short lived. In the USA, where the working class is less likely to influence social policy, interest in social capital could be longer lived or, alternatively, could drift in the academic limbo like other psychosocial constructs which at one point were heralded as the next 'big idea'.",
author = "Carles Muntaner and John Lynch and Smith, {George Davey}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "119--124",
journal = "Critical Public Health",
issn = "0958-1596",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social capital and the third way in public health

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Lynch, John

AU - Smith, George Davey

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - The construct of social capital has recently captured the interest of researchers in social epidemiology and public health. We review current hypotheses on the social capital and health link, and examine the empirical evidence available as well as its implications for health policy. With regard to theory, we contend that the construct as currently employed in the public health literature, lacks depth compared to its uses in social science. In addition, social capital presents itself as an alternative to materialist structural inequalities (class, gender and race) by bringing to the forefront of social epidemiology an appealing common sense idealist social psychology to which everyone can relate (e.g., good relations with your community are good for your health). The use of social capital invokes a romanticized view of communities without social conflict (e.g., Neo - Tocquevillian nineteenth century associationalism) and favours an idealist psychology over a psychology connected to both material resources and social structure. We argue that the evidence on social capital as a determinant of better health is still scant or ambiguous - depending on the definition that is used. Even if confirmed, social capital hypotheses call for social determinants beyond the proximal realm of social psychology. We also maintain that social capital is used in public health as an alternative to both state-centred economic redistribution (e.g., living wage, full employment, and universal health insurance) and party politics (e.g., gaining control of the executive branch of the government). Social capital represents a 'privatization' of both economics and politics. Such uses of social capital mirror recent Third Way policies in Germany, UK and US. If Third Way policies end up losing support in Europe, its prominence there might be short lived. In the USA, where the working class is less likely to influence social policy, interest in social capital could be longer lived or, alternatively, could drift in the academic limbo like other psychosocial constructs which at one point were heralded as the next 'big idea'.

AB - The construct of social capital has recently captured the interest of researchers in social epidemiology and public health. We review current hypotheses on the social capital and health link, and examine the empirical evidence available as well as its implications for health policy. With regard to theory, we contend that the construct as currently employed in the public health literature, lacks depth compared to its uses in social science. In addition, social capital presents itself as an alternative to materialist structural inequalities (class, gender and race) by bringing to the forefront of social epidemiology an appealing common sense idealist social psychology to which everyone can relate (e.g., good relations with your community are good for your health). The use of social capital invokes a romanticized view of communities without social conflict (e.g., Neo - Tocquevillian nineteenth century associationalism) and favours an idealist psychology over a psychology connected to both material resources and social structure. We argue that the evidence on social capital as a determinant of better health is still scant or ambiguous - depending on the definition that is used. Even if confirmed, social capital hypotheses call for social determinants beyond the proximal realm of social psychology. We also maintain that social capital is used in public health as an alternative to both state-centred economic redistribution (e.g., living wage, full employment, and universal health insurance) and party politics (e.g., gaining control of the executive branch of the government). Social capital represents a 'privatization' of both economics and politics. Such uses of social capital mirror recent Third Way policies in Germany, UK and US. If Third Way policies end up losing support in Europe, its prominence there might be short lived. In the USA, where the working class is less likely to influence social policy, interest in social capital could be longer lived or, alternatively, could drift in the academic limbo like other psychosocial constructs which at one point were heralded as the next 'big idea'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000667693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000667693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - Critical Public Health

JF - Critical Public Health

SN - 0958-1596

IS - 2

ER -