Sonoanatomical change of phrenic nerve according to posture during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block

Eui Soo Joeng, Young Cheol Jeong, Bum Jun Park, Seok K. Kang, Seung Nam Yang, Joon Shik Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the risk of phrenic nerve injury during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) according to sonoanatomy of the phrenic nerve, and determine a safer posture for needle insertion by assessing its relationship with surrounding structure according to positional change. Methods Twenty-nine healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent ultrasound in two postures, i.e., supine position with the neck extension and head rotation, and lateral decubitus position. The transducer was placed at the anterior tubercle of the C6 level to identify phrenic nerve. The cross-sectional area (CSA), depth from skin, distance between phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle of C6 transverse process, and the angle formed by anterior tubercle, posterior tubercle and phrenic nerve were measured. Results The phrenic nerve was clearly identified in the intermuscular fascia layer between the anterior scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The distance between the phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle was 10.33±3.20 mm with the supine position and 9.20±3.31 mm with the lateral decubitus position, respectively. The mean CSA and skin depth of phrenic nerve were not statistically different between the two positions. The angle with the supine position was 48.37°±27.43°, and 58.89°±30.02° with the lateral decubitus position. The difference of angle between the two positions was statistically significant. Conclusion Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing the phrenic nerve and its anatomical relation with other cervical structures. In addition, lateral decubitus position seems to be safer by providing wider angle for needle insertion than the supine position in US-SGB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-251
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Stellate Ganglion
Phrenic Nerve
Posture
Supine Position
Needles
Skin
Fascia
Transducers
Healthy Volunteers
Neck
Head
Muscles

Keywords

  • Phrenic nerve
  • Posture
  • Stellate ganglion
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Sonoanatomical change of phrenic nerve according to posture during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. / Joeng, Eui Soo; Jeong, Young Cheol; Park, Bum Jun; Kang, Seok K.; Yang, Seung Nam; Yoon, Joon Shik.

In: Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.01.2016, p. 244-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d6b4500728e40f6a3eb20684bb89383,
title = "Sonoanatomical change of phrenic nerve according to posture during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate the risk of phrenic nerve injury during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) according to sonoanatomy of the phrenic nerve, and determine a safer posture for needle insertion by assessing its relationship with surrounding structure according to positional change. Methods Twenty-nine healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent ultrasound in two postures, i.e., supine position with the neck extension and head rotation, and lateral decubitus position. The transducer was placed at the anterior tubercle of the C6 level to identify phrenic nerve. The cross-sectional area (CSA), depth from skin, distance between phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle of C6 transverse process, and the angle formed by anterior tubercle, posterior tubercle and phrenic nerve were measured. Results The phrenic nerve was clearly identified in the intermuscular fascia layer between the anterior scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The distance between the phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle was 10.33±3.20 mm with the supine position and 9.20±3.31 mm with the lateral decubitus position, respectively. The mean CSA and skin depth of phrenic nerve were not statistically different between the two positions. The angle with the supine position was 48.37°±27.43°, and 58.89°±30.02° with the lateral decubitus position. The difference of angle between the two positions was statistically significant. Conclusion Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing the phrenic nerve and its anatomical relation with other cervical structures. In addition, lateral decubitus position seems to be safer by providing wider angle for needle insertion than the supine position in US-SGB.",
keywords = "Phrenic nerve, Posture, Stellate ganglion, Ultrasound",
author = "Joeng, {Eui Soo} and Jeong, {Young Cheol} and Park, {Bum Jun} and Kang, {Seok K.} and Yang, {Seung Nam} and Yoon, {Joon Shik}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.244",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "244--251",
journal = "Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "2234-0645",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (KARM)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sonoanatomical change of phrenic nerve according to posture during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block

AU - Joeng, Eui Soo

AU - Jeong, Young Cheol

AU - Park, Bum Jun

AU - Kang, Seok K.

AU - Yang, Seung Nam

AU - Yoon, Joon Shik

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective To evaluate the risk of phrenic nerve injury during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) according to sonoanatomy of the phrenic nerve, and determine a safer posture for needle insertion by assessing its relationship with surrounding structure according to positional change. Methods Twenty-nine healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent ultrasound in two postures, i.e., supine position with the neck extension and head rotation, and lateral decubitus position. The transducer was placed at the anterior tubercle of the C6 level to identify phrenic nerve. The cross-sectional area (CSA), depth from skin, distance between phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle of C6 transverse process, and the angle formed by anterior tubercle, posterior tubercle and phrenic nerve were measured. Results The phrenic nerve was clearly identified in the intermuscular fascia layer between the anterior scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The distance between the phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle was 10.33±3.20 mm with the supine position and 9.20±3.31 mm with the lateral decubitus position, respectively. The mean CSA and skin depth of phrenic nerve were not statistically different between the two positions. The angle with the supine position was 48.37°±27.43°, and 58.89°±30.02° with the lateral decubitus position. The difference of angle between the two positions was statistically significant. Conclusion Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing the phrenic nerve and its anatomical relation with other cervical structures. In addition, lateral decubitus position seems to be safer by providing wider angle for needle insertion than the supine position in US-SGB.

AB - Objective To evaluate the risk of phrenic nerve injury during ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) according to sonoanatomy of the phrenic nerve, and determine a safer posture for needle insertion by assessing its relationship with surrounding structure according to positional change. Methods Twenty-nine healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent ultrasound in two postures, i.e., supine position with the neck extension and head rotation, and lateral decubitus position. The transducer was placed at the anterior tubercle of the C6 level to identify phrenic nerve. The cross-sectional area (CSA), depth from skin, distance between phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle of C6 transverse process, and the angle formed by anterior tubercle, posterior tubercle and phrenic nerve were measured. Results The phrenic nerve was clearly identified in the intermuscular fascia layer between the anterior scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The distance between the phrenic nerve and anterior tubercle was 10.33±3.20 mm with the supine position and 9.20±3.31 mm with the lateral decubitus position, respectively. The mean CSA and skin depth of phrenic nerve were not statistically different between the two positions. The angle with the supine position was 48.37°±27.43°, and 58.89°±30.02° with the lateral decubitus position. The difference of angle between the two positions was statistically significant. Conclusion Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing the phrenic nerve and its anatomical relation with other cervical structures. In addition, lateral decubitus position seems to be safer by providing wider angle for needle insertion than the supine position in US-SGB.

KW - Phrenic nerve

KW - Posture

KW - Stellate ganglion

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964856793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964856793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.244

DO - 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.244

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964856793

VL - 40

SP - 244

EP - 251

JO - Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 2234-0645

IS - 2

ER -