Spatial assessment of ecosystem functions and services for air purification of forests in South Korea

Cholho Song, Woo-Kyun Lee, Hyun Ah Choi, Jaeuk Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Joon Soon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecosystem functions can be understood as the quantified amount of an ecosystem's role in a natural process, while ecosystem services are the requantification of the ecosystem functions by factoring in environmental conditions and human needs based on social perspectives. In this study, differences between ecosystem functions and services were presented in terms of air purification of a forest ecosystem. Forest volume growth was employed to quantify the pollutant absorption capacity of a forest and was indicated by the natural functions (NF) for air purification by a forest ecosystem. Forest ecosystem services can be requantified from the forest functions by adding the air pollutant and population densities. Air pollutant density was applied to the assessment of the environmental services (ES) of forest ecosystems. Furthermore, the environmental social services (ESS) of forest ecosystems were assessed by including population density considerations. We simulated differences in NF, ES, and ESS in relation to pollutant and population density; while NF was spatially quantified without a close relationship to air pollutant and population density, ES and ESS reacted to environmental and social condition more sensitively. These results imply that the ecosystem services of forest resources for air purification are high where the pollutant and population densities are high, while the ecosystem functions of forest resources for air purification depend solely on forest conditions and not on the density changes of air pollutants and population. This study suggests that the differences in NF, ES, and ESS are important factors to be understood and considered in the decision-making process for ecosystem services. When considering human needs and surrounding environmental conditions, the results suggest that decision makers should utilize the ES and ESS concepts, which reflect both population and pollutant density along with additional human-related factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-34
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume63
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

ecosystem function
ecosystem service
South Korea
forest ecosystem
purification
population density
air
pollutant
environmental conditions
forest resource
mobile social services
environmental factors
decision making
social service
services
factoring
air pollutant
ecosystem
resources
decision-making process

Keywords

  • Air purification
  • Ecosystem function
  • Ecosystem service
  • Environmental service
  • Forest
  • Social service

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Spatial assessment of ecosystem functions and services for air purification of forests in South Korea. / Song, Cholho; Lee, Woo-Kyun; Choi, Hyun Ah; Kim, Jaeuk; Jeon, Seong Woo; Kim, Joon Soon.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 63, 01.09.2016, p. 27-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dedfe3464bc44f6cbf86689406ca1ab0,
title = "Spatial assessment of ecosystem functions and services for air purification of forests in South Korea",
abstract = "Ecosystem functions can be understood as the quantified amount of an ecosystem's role in a natural process, while ecosystem services are the requantification of the ecosystem functions by factoring in environmental conditions and human needs based on social perspectives. In this study, differences between ecosystem functions and services were presented in terms of air purification of a forest ecosystem. Forest volume growth was employed to quantify the pollutant absorption capacity of a forest and was indicated by the natural functions (NF) for air purification by a forest ecosystem. Forest ecosystem services can be requantified from the forest functions by adding the air pollutant and population densities. Air pollutant density was applied to the assessment of the environmental services (ES) of forest ecosystems. Furthermore, the environmental social services (ESS) of forest ecosystems were assessed by including population density considerations. We simulated differences in NF, ES, and ESS in relation to pollutant and population density; while NF was spatially quantified without a close relationship to air pollutant and population density, ES and ESS reacted to environmental and social condition more sensitively. These results imply that the ecosystem services of forest resources for air purification are high where the pollutant and population densities are high, while the ecosystem functions of forest resources for air purification depend solely on forest conditions and not on the density changes of air pollutants and population. This study suggests that the differences in NF, ES, and ESS are important factors to be understood and considered in the decision-making process for ecosystem services. When considering human needs and surrounding environmental conditions, the results suggest that decision makers should utilize the ES and ESS concepts, which reflect both population and pollutant density along with additional human-related factors.",
keywords = "Air purification, Ecosystem function, Ecosystem service, Environmental service, Forest, Social service",
author = "Cholho Song and Woo-Kyun Lee and Choi, {Hyun Ah} and Jaeuk Kim and Jeon, {Seong Woo} and Kim, {Joon Soon}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "27--34",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial assessment of ecosystem functions and services for air purification of forests in South Korea

AU - Song, Cholho

AU - Lee, Woo-Kyun

AU - Choi, Hyun Ah

AU - Kim, Jaeuk

AU - Jeon, Seong Woo

AU - Kim, Joon Soon

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Ecosystem functions can be understood as the quantified amount of an ecosystem's role in a natural process, while ecosystem services are the requantification of the ecosystem functions by factoring in environmental conditions and human needs based on social perspectives. In this study, differences between ecosystem functions and services were presented in terms of air purification of a forest ecosystem. Forest volume growth was employed to quantify the pollutant absorption capacity of a forest and was indicated by the natural functions (NF) for air purification by a forest ecosystem. Forest ecosystem services can be requantified from the forest functions by adding the air pollutant and population densities. Air pollutant density was applied to the assessment of the environmental services (ES) of forest ecosystems. Furthermore, the environmental social services (ESS) of forest ecosystems were assessed by including population density considerations. We simulated differences in NF, ES, and ESS in relation to pollutant and population density; while NF was spatially quantified without a close relationship to air pollutant and population density, ES and ESS reacted to environmental and social condition more sensitively. These results imply that the ecosystem services of forest resources for air purification are high where the pollutant and population densities are high, while the ecosystem functions of forest resources for air purification depend solely on forest conditions and not on the density changes of air pollutants and population. This study suggests that the differences in NF, ES, and ESS are important factors to be understood and considered in the decision-making process for ecosystem services. When considering human needs and surrounding environmental conditions, the results suggest that decision makers should utilize the ES and ESS concepts, which reflect both population and pollutant density along with additional human-related factors.

AB - Ecosystem functions can be understood as the quantified amount of an ecosystem's role in a natural process, while ecosystem services are the requantification of the ecosystem functions by factoring in environmental conditions and human needs based on social perspectives. In this study, differences between ecosystem functions and services were presented in terms of air purification of a forest ecosystem. Forest volume growth was employed to quantify the pollutant absorption capacity of a forest and was indicated by the natural functions (NF) for air purification by a forest ecosystem. Forest ecosystem services can be requantified from the forest functions by adding the air pollutant and population densities. Air pollutant density was applied to the assessment of the environmental services (ES) of forest ecosystems. Furthermore, the environmental social services (ESS) of forest ecosystems were assessed by including population density considerations. We simulated differences in NF, ES, and ESS in relation to pollutant and population density; while NF was spatially quantified without a close relationship to air pollutant and population density, ES and ESS reacted to environmental and social condition more sensitively. These results imply that the ecosystem services of forest resources for air purification are high where the pollutant and population densities are high, while the ecosystem functions of forest resources for air purification depend solely on forest conditions and not on the density changes of air pollutants and population. This study suggests that the differences in NF, ES, and ESS are important factors to be understood and considered in the decision-making process for ecosystem services. When considering human needs and surrounding environmental conditions, the results suggest that decision makers should utilize the ES and ESS concepts, which reflect both population and pollutant density along with additional human-related factors.

KW - Air purification

KW - Ecosystem function

KW - Ecosystem service

KW - Environmental service

KW - Forest

KW - Social service

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969504553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969504553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969504553

VL - 63

SP - 27

EP - 34

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -