Spatial Memory for Vertical Locations

Thomas Hinterecker, Caroline Leroy, Maximilian E. Kirschhock, Mintao Zhao, Martin V. Butz, Heinrich Bulthoff, Tobias Meilinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Most studies on spatial memory refer to the horizontal plane, leaving an open question as to whether findings generalize to vertical spaces where gravity and the visual upright of our surrounding space are salient orientation cues. In three experiments, we examined which reference frame is used to organize memory for vertical locations: the one based on the body vertical, the visual-room vertical, or the direction of gravity. Participants judged interobject spatial relationships learned from a vertical layout in a virtual room. During learning and testing, we varied the orientation of the participant's body (upright vs. lying sideways) and the visually presented room relative to gravity (e.g., rotated by 90° along the frontal plane). Across all experiments, participants made quicker or more accurate judgments when the room was oriented in the same way as during learning with respect to their body, irrespective of their orientations relative to gravity. This suggests that participants employed an egocentric body-based reference frame for representing vertical object locations. Our study also revealed an effect of body- gravity alignment during testing. Participants recalled spatial relations more accurately when upright, regardless of the body and visual-room orientation during learning. This finding is consistent with a hypothesis of selection conflict between different reference frames. Overall, our results suggest that a body-based reference frame is preferred over salient allocentric reference frames in memory for vertical locations perceived from a single view. Further, memory of vertical space seems to be tuned to work best in the default upright body orientation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jul 26

Fingerprint

Gravitation
Learning
Cues
learning
Spatial Memory
experiment
layout
Frame of Reference
Gravity

Keywords

  • Object locations
  • Reference frames
  • Spatial memory
  • Vertical dimension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Hinterecker, T., Leroy, C., Kirschhock, M. E., Zhao, M., Butz, M. V., Bulthoff, H., & Meilinger, T. (Accepted/In press). Spatial Memory for Vertical Locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000645

Spatial Memory for Vertical Locations. / Hinterecker, Thomas; Leroy, Caroline; Kirschhock, Maximilian E.; Zhao, Mintao; Butz, Martin V.; Bulthoff, Heinrich; Meilinger, Tobias.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hinterecker, Thomas ; Leroy, Caroline ; Kirschhock, Maximilian E. ; Zhao, Mintao ; Butz, Martin V. ; Bulthoff, Heinrich ; Meilinger, Tobias. / Spatial Memory for Vertical Locations. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 2018.
@article{b445917fd62845aab311628f71cb6dc7,
title = "Spatial Memory for Vertical Locations",
abstract = "Most studies on spatial memory refer to the horizontal plane, leaving an open question as to whether findings generalize to vertical spaces where gravity and the visual upright of our surrounding space are salient orientation cues. In three experiments, we examined which reference frame is used to organize memory for vertical locations: the one based on the body vertical, the visual-room vertical, or the direction of gravity. Participants judged interobject spatial relationships learned from a vertical layout in a virtual room. During learning and testing, we varied the orientation of the participant's body (upright vs. lying sideways) and the visually presented room relative to gravity (e.g., rotated by 90° along the frontal plane). Across all experiments, participants made quicker or more accurate judgments when the room was oriented in the same way as during learning with respect to their body, irrespective of their orientations relative to gravity. This suggests that participants employed an egocentric body-based reference frame for representing vertical object locations. Our study also revealed an effect of body- gravity alignment during testing. Participants recalled spatial relations more accurately when upright, regardless of the body and visual-room orientation during learning. This finding is consistent with a hypothesis of selection conflict between different reference frames. Overall, our results suggest that a body-based reference frame is preferred over salient allocentric reference frames in memory for vertical locations perceived from a single view. Further, memory of vertical space seems to be tuned to work best in the default upright body orientation.",
keywords = "Object locations, Reference frames, Spatial memory, Vertical dimension",
author = "Thomas Hinterecker and Caroline Leroy and Kirschhock, {Maximilian E.} and Mintao Zhao and Butz, {Martin V.} and Heinrich Bulthoff and Tobias Meilinger",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000645",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial Memory for Vertical Locations

AU - Hinterecker, Thomas

AU - Leroy, Caroline

AU - Kirschhock, Maximilian E.

AU - Zhao, Mintao

AU - Butz, Martin V.

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

AU - Meilinger, Tobias

PY - 2018/7/26

Y1 - 2018/7/26

N2 - Most studies on spatial memory refer to the horizontal plane, leaving an open question as to whether findings generalize to vertical spaces where gravity and the visual upright of our surrounding space are salient orientation cues. In three experiments, we examined which reference frame is used to organize memory for vertical locations: the one based on the body vertical, the visual-room vertical, or the direction of gravity. Participants judged interobject spatial relationships learned from a vertical layout in a virtual room. During learning and testing, we varied the orientation of the participant's body (upright vs. lying sideways) and the visually presented room relative to gravity (e.g., rotated by 90° along the frontal plane). Across all experiments, participants made quicker or more accurate judgments when the room was oriented in the same way as during learning with respect to their body, irrespective of their orientations relative to gravity. This suggests that participants employed an egocentric body-based reference frame for representing vertical object locations. Our study also revealed an effect of body- gravity alignment during testing. Participants recalled spatial relations more accurately when upright, regardless of the body and visual-room orientation during learning. This finding is consistent with a hypothesis of selection conflict between different reference frames. Overall, our results suggest that a body-based reference frame is preferred over salient allocentric reference frames in memory for vertical locations perceived from a single view. Further, memory of vertical space seems to be tuned to work best in the default upright body orientation.

AB - Most studies on spatial memory refer to the horizontal plane, leaving an open question as to whether findings generalize to vertical spaces where gravity and the visual upright of our surrounding space are salient orientation cues. In three experiments, we examined which reference frame is used to organize memory for vertical locations: the one based on the body vertical, the visual-room vertical, or the direction of gravity. Participants judged interobject spatial relationships learned from a vertical layout in a virtual room. During learning and testing, we varied the orientation of the participant's body (upright vs. lying sideways) and the visually presented room relative to gravity (e.g., rotated by 90° along the frontal plane). Across all experiments, participants made quicker or more accurate judgments when the room was oriented in the same way as during learning with respect to their body, irrespective of their orientations relative to gravity. This suggests that participants employed an egocentric body-based reference frame for representing vertical object locations. Our study also revealed an effect of body- gravity alignment during testing. Participants recalled spatial relations more accurately when upright, regardless of the body and visual-room orientation during learning. This finding is consistent with a hypothesis of selection conflict between different reference frames. Overall, our results suggest that a body-based reference frame is preferred over salient allocentric reference frames in memory for vertical locations perceived from a single view. Further, memory of vertical space seems to be tuned to work best in the default upright body orientation.

KW - Object locations

KW - Reference frames

KW - Spatial memory

KW - Vertical dimension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050508114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050508114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000645

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000645

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050508114

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

ER -