Statistical process control analysis for patient quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy

Rena Lee, Kyubo Kim, Samju Cho, Sangwook Lim, Suk Lee, Jang Bo Shim, Hyun Do Huh, Sang Hoon Lee, Sohyun Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study applied statistical process control to set and verify the quality assurances (QA) tolerance standard for our hospital’s characteristics with the criteria standards that are applied to all the treatment sites with this analysis. Gamma test factor of delivery quality assurances (DQA) was based on 3%/3 mm. Head and neck, breast, prostate cases of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) were selected for the analysis of the QA treatment sites. The numbers of data used in the analysis were 73 and 68 for head and neck patients. Prostate and breast were 49 and 152 by MapCHECK and ArcCHECK respectively. Cp value of head and neck and prostate QA were above 1.0, Cpml is 1.53 and 1.71 respectively, which is close to the target value of 100%. Cpml value of breast (IMRT) was 1.67, data values are close to the target value of 95%. But value of was 0.90, which means that the data values are widely distributed. Cp and Cpml of breast VMAT QA were respectively 1.07 and 2.10. This suggests that the VMAT QA has better process capability than the IMRT QA. Consequently, we should pay more attention to planning and QA before treatment for breast Radiotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717-721
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Korean Physical Society
Volume71
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Nov 1

Fingerprint

assurance
radiation therapy
breast
arcs
planning
delivery

Keywords

  • Gamma index
  • Gamma pass rate
  • IMRT/VMAT QA
  • Process capability index
  • Statistical process control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Statistical process control analysis for patient quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy. / Lee, Rena; Kim, Kyubo; Cho, Samju; Lim, Sangwook; Lee, Suk; Shim, Jang Bo; Huh, Hyun Do; Lee, Sang Hoon; Ahn, Sohyun.

In: Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 71, No. 10, 01.11.2017, p. 717-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Rena ; Kim, Kyubo ; Cho, Samju ; Lim, Sangwook ; Lee, Suk ; Shim, Jang Bo ; Huh, Hyun Do ; Lee, Sang Hoon ; Ahn, Sohyun. / Statistical process control analysis for patient quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy. In: Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 2017 ; Vol. 71, No. 10. pp. 717-721.
@article{3dced6c1d18542dcbec07bf83c99f8a1,
title = "Statistical process control analysis for patient quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy",
abstract = "This study applied statistical process control to set and verify the quality assurances (QA) tolerance standard for our hospital’s characteristics with the criteria standards that are applied to all the treatment sites with this analysis. Gamma test factor of delivery quality assurances (DQA) was based on 3{\%}/3 mm. Head and neck, breast, prostate cases of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) were selected for the analysis of the QA treatment sites. The numbers of data used in the analysis were 73 and 68 for head and neck patients. Prostate and breast were 49 and 152 by MapCHECK and ArcCHECK respectively. Cp value of head and neck and prostate QA were above 1.0, Cpml is 1.53 and 1.71 respectively, which is close to the target value of 100{\%}. Cpml value of breast (IMRT) was 1.67, data values are close to the target value of 95{\%}. But value of was 0.90, which means that the data values are widely distributed. Cp and Cpml of breast VMAT QA were respectively 1.07 and 2.10. This suggests that the VMAT QA has better process capability than the IMRT QA. Consequently, we should pay more attention to planning and QA before treatment for breast Radiotherapy.",
keywords = "Gamma index, Gamma pass rate, IMRT/VMAT QA, Process capability index, Statistical process control",
author = "Rena Lee and Kyubo Kim and Samju Cho and Sangwook Lim and Suk Lee and Shim, {Jang Bo} and Huh, {Hyun Do} and Lee, {Sang Hoon} and Sohyun Ahn",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3938/jkps.71.608",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "717--721",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Physical Society",
issn = "0374-4884",
publisher = "Korean Physical Society",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical process control analysis for patient quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy

AU - Lee, Rena

AU - Kim, Kyubo

AU - Cho, Samju

AU - Lim, Sangwook

AU - Lee, Suk

AU - Shim, Jang Bo

AU - Huh, Hyun Do

AU - Lee, Sang Hoon

AU - Ahn, Sohyun

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - This study applied statistical process control to set and verify the quality assurances (QA) tolerance standard for our hospital’s characteristics with the criteria standards that are applied to all the treatment sites with this analysis. Gamma test factor of delivery quality assurances (DQA) was based on 3%/3 mm. Head and neck, breast, prostate cases of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) were selected for the analysis of the QA treatment sites. The numbers of data used in the analysis were 73 and 68 for head and neck patients. Prostate and breast were 49 and 152 by MapCHECK and ArcCHECK respectively. Cp value of head and neck and prostate QA were above 1.0, Cpml is 1.53 and 1.71 respectively, which is close to the target value of 100%. Cpml value of breast (IMRT) was 1.67, data values are close to the target value of 95%. But value of was 0.90, which means that the data values are widely distributed. Cp and Cpml of breast VMAT QA were respectively 1.07 and 2.10. This suggests that the VMAT QA has better process capability than the IMRT QA. Consequently, we should pay more attention to planning and QA before treatment for breast Radiotherapy.

AB - This study applied statistical process control to set and verify the quality assurances (QA) tolerance standard for our hospital’s characteristics with the criteria standards that are applied to all the treatment sites with this analysis. Gamma test factor of delivery quality assurances (DQA) was based on 3%/3 mm. Head and neck, breast, prostate cases of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) were selected for the analysis of the QA treatment sites. The numbers of data used in the analysis were 73 and 68 for head and neck patients. Prostate and breast were 49 and 152 by MapCHECK and ArcCHECK respectively. Cp value of head and neck and prostate QA were above 1.0, Cpml is 1.53 and 1.71 respectively, which is close to the target value of 100%. Cpml value of breast (IMRT) was 1.67, data values are close to the target value of 95%. But value of was 0.90, which means that the data values are widely distributed. Cp and Cpml of breast VMAT QA were respectively 1.07 and 2.10. This suggests that the VMAT QA has better process capability than the IMRT QA. Consequently, we should pay more attention to planning and QA before treatment for breast Radiotherapy.

KW - Gamma index

KW - Gamma pass rate

KW - IMRT/VMAT QA

KW - Process capability index

KW - Statistical process control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035084709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035084709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3938/jkps.71.608

DO - 10.3938/jkps.71.608

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035084709

VL - 71

SP - 717

EP - 721

JO - Journal of the Korean Physical Society

JF - Journal of the Korean Physical Society

SN - 0374-4884

IS - 10

ER -