Strain-based plastic instability acceptance criteria for ferritic steel safety class 1 nuclear components under level D service loads

Ji Su Kim, Han Sang Lee, Jong Sung Kim, Yun-Jae Kim, Jin Won Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes strain-based acceptance criteria for assessing plastic instability of the safety class 1 nuclear components made of ferritic steel during level D service loads. The strain-based criteria were proposed with two approaches: (1) a section average approach and (2) a critical location approach. Both approaches were based on the damage initiation point corresponding to the maximum load-carrying capability point instead of the fracture point via tensile tests and finite element analysis (FEA) for the notched specimen under uni-axial tensile loading. The two proposed criteria were reviewed from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy to select a more appropriate criterion. As a result of the review, it was found that the section average approach is more appropriate than the critical location approach from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy. Finally, the criterion based on the section average approach was applied to a simplified reactor pressure vessel (RPV) outlet nozzle subject to SSE loads. The application shows that the strain-based acceptance criteria can consider cumulative damages caused by the sequential loads unlike the stress-based acceptance criteria and can reduce the overconservatism of the stress-based acceptance criteria, which often occurs for level D service loads.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-350
Number of pages11
JournalNuclear Engineering and Technology
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Ferritic steel
Loads (forces)
Plastics
Pressure vessels
Nozzles
Finite element method

Keywords

  • Components
  • Damage initiation model
  • Finite element analysis
  • Level D service loads
  • Plastic instability
  • Safety class 1 nuclear
  • Strain-based acceptance criteria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Cite this

Strain-based plastic instability acceptance criteria for ferritic steel safety class 1 nuclear components under level D service loads. / Kim, Ji Su; Lee, Han Sang; Kim, Jong Sung; Kim, Yun-Jae; Kim, Jin Won.

In: Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2015, p. 340-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b91578622fd4fc485cfd79316613ca1,
title = "Strain-based plastic instability acceptance criteria for ferritic steel safety class 1 nuclear components under level D service loads",
abstract = "This paper proposes strain-based acceptance criteria for assessing plastic instability of the safety class 1 nuclear components made of ferritic steel during level D service loads. The strain-based criteria were proposed with two approaches: (1) a section average approach and (2) a critical location approach. Both approaches were based on the damage initiation point corresponding to the maximum load-carrying capability point instead of the fracture point via tensile tests and finite element analysis (FEA) for the notched specimen under uni-axial tensile loading. The two proposed criteria were reviewed from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy to select a more appropriate criterion. As a result of the review, it was found that the section average approach is more appropriate than the critical location approach from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy. Finally, the criterion based on the section average approach was applied to a simplified reactor pressure vessel (RPV) outlet nozzle subject to SSE loads. The application shows that the strain-based acceptance criteria can consider cumulative damages caused by the sequential loads unlike the stress-based acceptance criteria and can reduce the overconservatism of the stress-based acceptance criteria, which often occurs for level D service loads.",
keywords = "Components, Damage initiation model, Finite element analysis, Level D service loads, Plastic instability, Safety class 1 nuclear, Strain-based acceptance criteria",
author = "Kim, {Ji Su} and Lee, {Han Sang} and Kim, {Jong Sung} and Yun-Jae Kim and Kim, {Jin Won}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.net.2014.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "340--350",
journal = "Nuclear Engineering and Technology",
issn = "1738-5733",
publisher = "Korean Nuclear Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strain-based plastic instability acceptance criteria for ferritic steel safety class 1 nuclear components under level D service loads

AU - Kim, Ji Su

AU - Lee, Han Sang

AU - Kim, Jong Sung

AU - Kim, Yun-Jae

AU - Kim, Jin Won

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper proposes strain-based acceptance criteria for assessing plastic instability of the safety class 1 nuclear components made of ferritic steel during level D service loads. The strain-based criteria were proposed with two approaches: (1) a section average approach and (2) a critical location approach. Both approaches were based on the damage initiation point corresponding to the maximum load-carrying capability point instead of the fracture point via tensile tests and finite element analysis (FEA) for the notched specimen under uni-axial tensile loading. The two proposed criteria were reviewed from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy to select a more appropriate criterion. As a result of the review, it was found that the section average approach is more appropriate than the critical location approach from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy. Finally, the criterion based on the section average approach was applied to a simplified reactor pressure vessel (RPV) outlet nozzle subject to SSE loads. The application shows that the strain-based acceptance criteria can consider cumulative damages caused by the sequential loads unlike the stress-based acceptance criteria and can reduce the overconservatism of the stress-based acceptance criteria, which often occurs for level D service loads.

AB - This paper proposes strain-based acceptance criteria for assessing plastic instability of the safety class 1 nuclear components made of ferritic steel during level D service loads. The strain-based criteria were proposed with two approaches: (1) a section average approach and (2) a critical location approach. Both approaches were based on the damage initiation point corresponding to the maximum load-carrying capability point instead of the fracture point via tensile tests and finite element analysis (FEA) for the notched specimen under uni-axial tensile loading. The two proposed criteria were reviewed from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy to select a more appropriate criterion. As a result of the review, it was found that the section average approach is more appropriate than the critical location approach from the viewpoint of design practice and philosophy. Finally, the criterion based on the section average approach was applied to a simplified reactor pressure vessel (RPV) outlet nozzle subject to SSE loads. The application shows that the strain-based acceptance criteria can consider cumulative damages caused by the sequential loads unlike the stress-based acceptance criteria and can reduce the overconservatism of the stress-based acceptance criteria, which often occurs for level D service loads.

KW - Components

KW - Damage initiation model

KW - Finite element analysis

KW - Level D service loads

KW - Plastic instability

KW - Safety class 1 nuclear

KW - Strain-based acceptance criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928613355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928613355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.net.2014.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.net.2014.12.016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928613355

VL - 47

SP - 340

EP - 350

JO - Nuclear Engineering and Technology

JF - Nuclear Engineering and Technology

SN - 1738-5733

IS - 3

ER -