Stratus OCT image analysis with spectral-domain OCT (Topcon 3D OCT Viewer)

Seong-Woo Kim, Jae Ryung Oh, Kyung Sook Yang, Young Ho Kim, Jin Whan Park, Jay Won Rhim, Kuhl Huh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: To assess the accuracy of the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer in analysing Stratus OCT data. Methods: Randomly selected fast macular thickness map protocol optical coherence tomography (OCT) raw data were exported from the Stratus OCT database and imported into and analysed with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer. The segmentation error (SE) rates and scores were compared between the two programs. Differences in the retinal thickness between the two programs were measured in both the SE (-) group and the SE (+) group. Results: 356 eyes were analysed. The SE rate and mean SE score were significantly lower with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer than with Stratus OCT ((30.9% (110/356) vs 38.2% (136/356), p=0.011; 0.33±0.59 vs 0.48±0.96, p=0.003), respectively). In the SE (e) group, the mean of the differences between the two programs was -2.79 μm (p<0.001) in the central 1 mm zone of the nine ETDRS areas and 1.49 mm (p=0.152) for the automated centre point thickness. Conclusions The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer analysed Stratus OCT data very well and displayed better segmentation performance. The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer program can be used interchangeably for the measurement of macular thickness, but careful interpretation by a clinician is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-98
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume96
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Optical Coherence Tomography
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Stratus OCT image analysis with spectral-domain OCT (Topcon 3D OCT Viewer). / Kim, Seong-Woo; Oh, Jae Ryung; Yang, Kyung Sook; Kim, Young Ho; Park, Jin Whan; Rhim, Jay Won; Huh, Kuhl.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 96, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 93-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Seong-Woo ; Oh, Jae Ryung ; Yang, Kyung Sook ; Kim, Young Ho ; Park, Jin Whan ; Rhim, Jay Won ; Huh, Kuhl. / Stratus OCT image analysis with spectral-domain OCT (Topcon 3D OCT Viewer). In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012 ; Vol. 96, No. 1. pp. 93-98.
@article{94fd6995928648d5b7657518ff07f16a,
title = "Stratus OCT image analysis with spectral-domain OCT (Topcon 3D OCT Viewer)",
abstract = "Aims: To assess the accuracy of the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer in analysing Stratus OCT data. Methods: Randomly selected fast macular thickness map protocol optical coherence tomography (OCT) raw data were exported from the Stratus OCT database and imported into and analysed with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer. The segmentation error (SE) rates and scores were compared between the two programs. Differences in the retinal thickness between the two programs were measured in both the SE (-) group and the SE (+) group. Results: 356 eyes were analysed. The SE rate and mean SE score were significantly lower with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer than with Stratus OCT ((30.9{\%} (110/356) vs 38.2{\%} (136/356), p=0.011; 0.33±0.59 vs 0.48±0.96, p=0.003), respectively). In the SE (e) group, the mean of the differences between the two programs was -2.79 μm (p<0.001) in the central 1 mm zone of the nine ETDRS areas and 1.49 mm (p=0.152) for the automated centre point thickness. Conclusions The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer analysed Stratus OCT data very well and displayed better segmentation performance. The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer program can be used interchangeably for the measurement of macular thickness, but careful interpretation by a clinician is needed.",
author = "Seong-Woo Kim and Oh, {Jae Ryung} and Yang, {Kyung Sook} and Kim, {Young Ho} and Park, {Jin Whan} and Rhim, {Jay Won} and Kuhl Huh",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2010.193144",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "93--98",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stratus OCT image analysis with spectral-domain OCT (Topcon 3D OCT Viewer)

AU - Kim, Seong-Woo

AU - Oh, Jae Ryung

AU - Yang, Kyung Sook

AU - Kim, Young Ho

AU - Park, Jin Whan

AU - Rhim, Jay Won

AU - Huh, Kuhl

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Aims: To assess the accuracy of the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer in analysing Stratus OCT data. Methods: Randomly selected fast macular thickness map protocol optical coherence tomography (OCT) raw data were exported from the Stratus OCT database and imported into and analysed with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer. The segmentation error (SE) rates and scores were compared between the two programs. Differences in the retinal thickness between the two programs were measured in both the SE (-) group and the SE (+) group. Results: 356 eyes were analysed. The SE rate and mean SE score were significantly lower with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer than with Stratus OCT ((30.9% (110/356) vs 38.2% (136/356), p=0.011; 0.33±0.59 vs 0.48±0.96, p=0.003), respectively). In the SE (e) group, the mean of the differences between the two programs was -2.79 μm (p<0.001) in the central 1 mm zone of the nine ETDRS areas and 1.49 mm (p=0.152) for the automated centre point thickness. Conclusions The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer analysed Stratus OCT data very well and displayed better segmentation performance. The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer program can be used interchangeably for the measurement of macular thickness, but careful interpretation by a clinician is needed.

AB - Aims: To assess the accuracy of the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer in analysing Stratus OCT data. Methods: Randomly selected fast macular thickness map protocol optical coherence tomography (OCT) raw data were exported from the Stratus OCT database and imported into and analysed with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer. The segmentation error (SE) rates and scores were compared between the two programs. Differences in the retinal thickness between the two programs were measured in both the SE (-) group and the SE (+) group. Results: 356 eyes were analysed. The SE rate and mean SE score were significantly lower with the Topcon 3D OCT Viewer than with Stratus OCT ((30.9% (110/356) vs 38.2% (136/356), p=0.011; 0.33±0.59 vs 0.48±0.96, p=0.003), respectively). In the SE (e) group, the mean of the differences between the two programs was -2.79 μm (p<0.001) in the central 1 mm zone of the nine ETDRS areas and 1.49 mm (p=0.152) for the automated centre point thickness. Conclusions The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer analysed Stratus OCT data very well and displayed better segmentation performance. The Topcon 3D OCT Viewer program can be used interchangeably for the measurement of macular thickness, but careful interpretation by a clinician is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84455180653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84455180653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2010.193144

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2010.193144

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 93

EP - 98

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 1

ER -