Strength of circular concrete-filled tubes with and without internal reinforcement under combined loading

Jiho Moon, Dawn E. Lehman, Charles W. Roeder, Hak Eun Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs) have been used in civil engineering practice as piles, caissons, columns, and bridge piers. Relative to conventional structural steel and reinforced concrete components, CFTs have several advantages. The steel tube serves as both reinforcement and formwork, eliminating the need for both, and provides large tensile and compressive capacities; the concrete fill restrains buckling of the steel tube, which increases the strength, stiffness, and deformability of the section. In some cases, internal reinforcement is used to enhance the strength and facilitate connection to adjacent members. Although these properties are well accepted, the use of CFTs in practice is awkward because design provisions among codes vary significantly and previous research has not considered internal reinforcement. An analytical research study was undertaken to evaluate and improve design provisions for CFTs with and without internal reinforcement under combined axial load and bending. A continuum model was developed to simulate prior test results subjected to combined loading and the validated model was used to investigate the strength and inelastic performance of CFTs under combined loading. Current design provisions for CFTs were evaluated using the results of these finite-element analysis and previous test results. The comparisons indicate that current design approach provides good prediction of CFT capacity subjected only to bending or axial demands, but current provisions provide conservative values for the CFTs under general combined loading. An alternative P-M interaction curve for CFTs was proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04013012
JournalJournal of Structural Engineering (United States)
Volume139
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Reinforcement
Concretes
Steel
Caissons
Bridge piers
Axial loads
Formability
Civil engineering
Piles
Buckling
Reinforced concrete
Stiffness
Finite element method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Strength of circular concrete-filled tubes with and without internal reinforcement under combined loading. / Moon, Jiho; Lehman, Dawn E.; Roeder, Charles W.; Lee, Hak Eun.

In: Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), Vol. 139, No. 12, 04013012, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4902c96e242a4856816cd5ff3e18e864,
title = "Strength of circular concrete-filled tubes with and without internal reinforcement under combined loading",
abstract = "Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs) have been used in civil engineering practice as piles, caissons, columns, and bridge piers. Relative to conventional structural steel and reinforced concrete components, CFTs have several advantages. The steel tube serves as both reinforcement and formwork, eliminating the need for both, and provides large tensile and compressive capacities; the concrete fill restrains buckling of the steel tube, which increases the strength, stiffness, and deformability of the section. In some cases, internal reinforcement is used to enhance the strength and facilitate connection to adjacent members. Although these properties are well accepted, the use of CFTs in practice is awkward because design provisions among codes vary significantly and previous research has not considered internal reinforcement. An analytical research study was undertaken to evaluate and improve design provisions for CFTs with and without internal reinforcement under combined axial load and bending. A continuum model was developed to simulate prior test results subjected to combined loading and the validated model was used to investigate the strength and inelastic performance of CFTs under combined loading. Current design provisions for CFTs were evaluated using the results of these finite-element analysis and previous test results. The comparisons indicate that current design approach provides good prediction of CFT capacity subjected only to bending or axial demands, but current provisions provide conservative values for the CFTs under general combined loading. An alternative P-M interaction curve for CFTs was proposed.",
keywords = "Buckling, Composite behavior, Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs), Metal and composite structures, Nonlinear finite-element analysis, P - M interaction curve, Structural design",
author = "Jiho Moon and Lehman, {Dawn E.} and Roeder, {Charles W.} and Lee, {Hak Eun}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000788",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
journal = "Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)",
issn = "0733-9445",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strength of circular concrete-filled tubes with and without internal reinforcement under combined loading

AU - Moon, Jiho

AU - Lehman, Dawn E.

AU - Roeder, Charles W.

AU - Lee, Hak Eun

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs) have been used in civil engineering practice as piles, caissons, columns, and bridge piers. Relative to conventional structural steel and reinforced concrete components, CFTs have several advantages. The steel tube serves as both reinforcement and formwork, eliminating the need for both, and provides large tensile and compressive capacities; the concrete fill restrains buckling of the steel tube, which increases the strength, stiffness, and deformability of the section. In some cases, internal reinforcement is used to enhance the strength and facilitate connection to adjacent members. Although these properties are well accepted, the use of CFTs in practice is awkward because design provisions among codes vary significantly and previous research has not considered internal reinforcement. An analytical research study was undertaken to evaluate and improve design provisions for CFTs with and without internal reinforcement under combined axial load and bending. A continuum model was developed to simulate prior test results subjected to combined loading and the validated model was used to investigate the strength and inelastic performance of CFTs under combined loading. Current design provisions for CFTs were evaluated using the results of these finite-element analysis and previous test results. The comparisons indicate that current design approach provides good prediction of CFT capacity subjected only to bending or axial demands, but current provisions provide conservative values for the CFTs under general combined loading. An alternative P-M interaction curve for CFTs was proposed.

AB - Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs) have been used in civil engineering practice as piles, caissons, columns, and bridge piers. Relative to conventional structural steel and reinforced concrete components, CFTs have several advantages. The steel tube serves as both reinforcement and formwork, eliminating the need for both, and provides large tensile and compressive capacities; the concrete fill restrains buckling of the steel tube, which increases the strength, stiffness, and deformability of the section. In some cases, internal reinforcement is used to enhance the strength and facilitate connection to adjacent members. Although these properties are well accepted, the use of CFTs in practice is awkward because design provisions among codes vary significantly and previous research has not considered internal reinforcement. An analytical research study was undertaken to evaluate and improve design provisions for CFTs with and without internal reinforcement under combined axial load and bending. A continuum model was developed to simulate prior test results subjected to combined loading and the validated model was used to investigate the strength and inelastic performance of CFTs under combined loading. Current design provisions for CFTs were evaluated using the results of these finite-element analysis and previous test results. The comparisons indicate that current design approach provides good prediction of CFT capacity subjected only to bending or axial demands, but current provisions provide conservative values for the CFTs under general combined loading. An alternative P-M interaction curve for CFTs was proposed.

KW - Buckling

KW - Composite behavior

KW - Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs)

KW - Metal and composite structures

KW - Nonlinear finite-element analysis

KW - P - M interaction curve

KW - Structural design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904796822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904796822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000788

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000788

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904796822

VL - 139

JO - Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)

JF - Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)

SN - 0733-9445

IS - 12

M1 - 04013012

ER -