Strengthening the implementation of health in all policies

A methodology for realist explanatory case studies

Ketan Shankardass, Emilie Renahy, Carles Muntaner, Patricia O'Campo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To address macro-social and economic determinants of health and equity, there has been growing use of intersectoral action by governments around the world. Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives are a special case where governments use cross-sectoral structures and relationships to systematically address health in policymaking by targeting broad health determinants rather than health services alone. Although many examples of HiAP have emerged in recent decades, the reasons for their successful implementation-and for implementation failures-have not been systematically studied. Consequently, rigorous evidence based on systematic research of the social mechanisms that have regularly enabled or hindered implementation in different jurisdictions is sparse. We describe a novel methodology for explanatory case studies that use a scientific realist perspective to study the implementation of HiAP. Our methodology begins with the formulation of a conceptual framework to describe contexts, social mechanisms and outcomes of relevance to the sustainable implementation of HiAP. We then describe the process of systematically explaining phenomena of interest using evidence from literature and key informant interviews, and looking for patterns and themes. Finally, we present a comparative example of how Health Impact Assessment tools have been utilized in Sweden and Quebec to illustrate how this methodology uses evidence to first describe successful practices for implementation of HiAP and then refine the initial framework. The methodology that we describe helps researchers to identify and triangulate rich evidence describing social mechanisms and salient contextual factors that characterize successful practices in implementing HiAP in specific jurisdictions. This methodology can be applied to study the implementation of HiAP and other forms of intersectoral action to reduce health inequities involving multiple geographic levels of government in diverse settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)462-473
Number of pages12
JournalHealth Policy and Planning
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 May 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Health Impact Assessment
Social Determinants of Health
Quebec
Sweden
Health Services
Economics
Research Personnel
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • determinants
  • equity
  • Health policy
  • health promotion
  • implementation
  • social determinants
  • social epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Strengthening the implementation of health in all policies : A methodology for realist explanatory case studies. / Shankardass, Ketan; Renahy, Emilie; Muntaner, Carles; O'Campo, Patricia.

In: Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.05.2015, p. 462-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shankardass, Ketan ; Renahy, Emilie ; Muntaner, Carles ; O'Campo, Patricia. / Strengthening the implementation of health in all policies : A methodology for realist explanatory case studies. In: Health Policy and Planning. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 462-473.
@article{bc6cd293a6bf42829474e7cac4c08aff,
title = "Strengthening the implementation of health in all policies: A methodology for realist explanatory case studies",
abstract = "To address macro-social and economic determinants of health and equity, there has been growing use of intersectoral action by governments around the world. Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives are a special case where governments use cross-sectoral structures and relationships to systematically address health in policymaking by targeting broad health determinants rather than health services alone. Although many examples of HiAP have emerged in recent decades, the reasons for their successful implementation-and for implementation failures-have not been systematically studied. Consequently, rigorous evidence based on systematic research of the social mechanisms that have regularly enabled or hindered implementation in different jurisdictions is sparse. We describe a novel methodology for explanatory case studies that use a scientific realist perspective to study the implementation of HiAP. Our methodology begins with the formulation of a conceptual framework to describe contexts, social mechanisms and outcomes of relevance to the sustainable implementation of HiAP. We then describe the process of systematically explaining phenomena of interest using evidence from literature and key informant interviews, and looking for patterns and themes. Finally, we present a comparative example of how Health Impact Assessment tools have been utilized in Sweden and Quebec to illustrate how this methodology uses evidence to first describe successful practices for implementation of HiAP and then refine the initial framework. The methodology that we describe helps researchers to identify and triangulate rich evidence describing social mechanisms and salient contextual factors that characterize successful practices in implementing HiAP in specific jurisdictions. This methodology can be applied to study the implementation of HiAP and other forms of intersectoral action to reduce health inequities involving multiple geographic levels of government in diverse settings.",
keywords = "determinants, equity, Health policy, health promotion, implementation, social determinants, social epidemiology",
author = "Ketan Shankardass and Emilie Renahy and Carles Muntaner and Patricia O'Campo",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/heapol/czu021",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "462--473",
journal = "Health Policy and Planning",
issn = "0268-1080",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strengthening the implementation of health in all policies

T2 - A methodology for realist explanatory case studies

AU - Shankardass, Ketan

AU - Renahy, Emilie

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - O'Campo, Patricia

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - To address macro-social and economic determinants of health and equity, there has been growing use of intersectoral action by governments around the world. Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives are a special case where governments use cross-sectoral structures and relationships to systematically address health in policymaking by targeting broad health determinants rather than health services alone. Although many examples of HiAP have emerged in recent decades, the reasons for their successful implementation-and for implementation failures-have not been systematically studied. Consequently, rigorous evidence based on systematic research of the social mechanisms that have regularly enabled or hindered implementation in different jurisdictions is sparse. We describe a novel methodology for explanatory case studies that use a scientific realist perspective to study the implementation of HiAP. Our methodology begins with the formulation of a conceptual framework to describe contexts, social mechanisms and outcomes of relevance to the sustainable implementation of HiAP. We then describe the process of systematically explaining phenomena of interest using evidence from literature and key informant interviews, and looking for patterns and themes. Finally, we present a comparative example of how Health Impact Assessment tools have been utilized in Sweden and Quebec to illustrate how this methodology uses evidence to first describe successful practices for implementation of HiAP and then refine the initial framework. The methodology that we describe helps researchers to identify and triangulate rich evidence describing social mechanisms and salient contextual factors that characterize successful practices in implementing HiAP in specific jurisdictions. This methodology can be applied to study the implementation of HiAP and other forms of intersectoral action to reduce health inequities involving multiple geographic levels of government in diverse settings.

AB - To address macro-social and economic determinants of health and equity, there has been growing use of intersectoral action by governments around the world. Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives are a special case where governments use cross-sectoral structures and relationships to systematically address health in policymaking by targeting broad health determinants rather than health services alone. Although many examples of HiAP have emerged in recent decades, the reasons for their successful implementation-and for implementation failures-have not been systematically studied. Consequently, rigorous evidence based on systematic research of the social mechanisms that have regularly enabled or hindered implementation in different jurisdictions is sparse. We describe a novel methodology for explanatory case studies that use a scientific realist perspective to study the implementation of HiAP. Our methodology begins with the formulation of a conceptual framework to describe contexts, social mechanisms and outcomes of relevance to the sustainable implementation of HiAP. We then describe the process of systematically explaining phenomena of interest using evidence from literature and key informant interviews, and looking for patterns and themes. Finally, we present a comparative example of how Health Impact Assessment tools have been utilized in Sweden and Quebec to illustrate how this methodology uses evidence to first describe successful practices for implementation of HiAP and then refine the initial framework. The methodology that we describe helps researchers to identify and triangulate rich evidence describing social mechanisms and salient contextual factors that characterize successful practices in implementing HiAP in specific jurisdictions. This methodology can be applied to study the implementation of HiAP and other forms of intersectoral action to reduce health inequities involving multiple geographic levels of government in diverse settings.

KW - determinants

KW - equity

KW - Health policy

KW - health promotion

KW - implementation

KW - social determinants

KW - social epidemiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928948181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928948181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/heapol/czu021

DO - 10.1093/heapol/czu021

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 462

EP - 473

JO - Health Policy and Planning

JF - Health Policy and Planning

SN - 0268-1080

IS - 4

ER -