Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents

Issues and Outcomes

James A. Hall, Douglas C. Smith, Scott D. Easton, Hyonggin An, Julie K. Williams, Susan H. Godley, Mijin Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the characteristics and treatment outcomes of rural adolescents with urban adolescents in substance abuse treatment programs in CSAT's Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) initiative. Using data from ten SCY programs nationally, the authors classified adolescents as rural or urban using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. We then evaluated changes in substance use frequency and substance-related problems at three, six, and 12 months after baseline assessments for the two sites that treated rural (n = 59) and urban (n = 345) youth in outpatient settings. Data were analyzed using a two-part mixed effects model for zero-saturated dependent variables. At treatment intake, rural youth exhibited greater problem severity on a number of substance abuse and mental health indices. From intake to the 12-month follow-up point, the percentages of both urban and rural youth who reported abstinence increased significantly. Both rural and urban youth also reported fewer problems due to substance use over time, but differences between groups were not consistent. Overall, treatment appears equally effective for both rural and urban adolescents. As few rural youth obtained treatment, we encourage funding agencies and treatment providers to consider innovative ways for providing services in rural areas and addressing gaps in primary prevention, early identification, and continuing care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-120
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychoactive Drugs
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Substance-Related Disorders
Therapeutics
Primary Prevention
Mental Health
Outpatients

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Drug abuse
  • Rural studies
  • Substance abuse treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Hall, J. A., Smith, D. C., Easton, S. D., An, H., Williams, J. K., Godley, S. H., & Jang, M. (2008). Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents: Issues and Outcomes. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 40(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2008.10399766

Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents : Issues and Outcomes. / Hall, James A.; Smith, Douglas C.; Easton, Scott D.; An, Hyonggin; Williams, Julie K.; Godley, Susan H.; Jang, Mijin.

In: Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 109-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hall, JA, Smith, DC, Easton, SD, An, H, Williams, JK, Godley, SH & Jang, M 2008, 'Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents: Issues and Outcomes', Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2008.10399766
Hall, James A. ; Smith, Douglas C. ; Easton, Scott D. ; An, Hyonggin ; Williams, Julie K. ; Godley, Susan H. ; Jang, Mijin. / Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents : Issues and Outcomes. In: Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 109-120.
@article{b440e05e9c474e71b84e7ce87cafb278,
title = "Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents: Issues and Outcomes",
abstract = "This study compared the characteristics and treatment outcomes of rural adolescents with urban adolescents in substance abuse treatment programs in CSAT's Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) initiative. Using data from ten SCY programs nationally, the authors classified adolescents as rural or urban using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. We then evaluated changes in substance use frequency and substance-related problems at three, six, and 12 months after baseline assessments for the two sites that treated rural (n = 59) and urban (n = 345) youth in outpatient settings. Data were analyzed using a two-part mixed effects model for zero-saturated dependent variables. At treatment intake, rural youth exhibited greater problem severity on a number of substance abuse and mental health indices. From intake to the 12-month follow-up point, the percentages of both urban and rural youth who reported abstinence increased significantly. Both rural and urban youth also reported fewer problems due to substance use over time, but differences between groups were not consistent. Overall, treatment appears equally effective for both rural and urban adolescents. As few rural youth obtained treatment, we encourage funding agencies and treatment providers to consider innovative ways for providing services in rural areas and addressing gaps in primary prevention, early identification, and continuing care.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Drug abuse, Rural studies, Substance abuse treatment",
author = "Hall, {James A.} and Smith, {Douglas C.} and Easton, {Scott D.} and Hyonggin An and Williams, {Julie K.} and Godley, {Susan H.} and Mijin Jang",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02791072.2008.10399766",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "109--120",
journal = "Journal of Psychoactive Drugs",
issn = "0279-1072",
publisher = "Haight-Ashbury Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents

T2 - Issues and Outcomes

AU - Hall, James A.

AU - Smith, Douglas C.

AU - Easton, Scott D.

AU - An, Hyonggin

AU - Williams, Julie K.

AU - Godley, Susan H.

AU - Jang, Mijin

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This study compared the characteristics and treatment outcomes of rural adolescents with urban adolescents in substance abuse treatment programs in CSAT's Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) initiative. Using data from ten SCY programs nationally, the authors classified adolescents as rural or urban using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. We then evaluated changes in substance use frequency and substance-related problems at three, six, and 12 months after baseline assessments for the two sites that treated rural (n = 59) and urban (n = 345) youth in outpatient settings. Data were analyzed using a two-part mixed effects model for zero-saturated dependent variables. At treatment intake, rural youth exhibited greater problem severity on a number of substance abuse and mental health indices. From intake to the 12-month follow-up point, the percentages of both urban and rural youth who reported abstinence increased significantly. Both rural and urban youth also reported fewer problems due to substance use over time, but differences between groups were not consistent. Overall, treatment appears equally effective for both rural and urban adolescents. As few rural youth obtained treatment, we encourage funding agencies and treatment providers to consider innovative ways for providing services in rural areas and addressing gaps in primary prevention, early identification, and continuing care.

AB - This study compared the characteristics and treatment outcomes of rural adolescents with urban adolescents in substance abuse treatment programs in CSAT's Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) initiative. Using data from ten SCY programs nationally, the authors classified adolescents as rural or urban using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. We then evaluated changes in substance use frequency and substance-related problems at three, six, and 12 months after baseline assessments for the two sites that treated rural (n = 59) and urban (n = 345) youth in outpatient settings. Data were analyzed using a two-part mixed effects model for zero-saturated dependent variables. At treatment intake, rural youth exhibited greater problem severity on a number of substance abuse and mental health indices. From intake to the 12-month follow-up point, the percentages of both urban and rural youth who reported abstinence increased significantly. Both rural and urban youth also reported fewer problems due to substance use over time, but differences between groups were not consistent. Overall, treatment appears equally effective for both rural and urban adolescents. As few rural youth obtained treatment, we encourage funding agencies and treatment providers to consider innovative ways for providing services in rural areas and addressing gaps in primary prevention, early identification, and continuing care.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Drug abuse

KW - Rural studies

KW - Substance abuse treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42449142664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42449142664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02791072.2008.10399766

DO - 10.1080/02791072.2008.10399766

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 109

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

JF - Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

SN - 0279-1072

IS - 1

ER -